In truth, I don’t have a clue who Hellary’s boy will be, but I wouldn’t want to base a prediction on the premise that today’s Democratic Party won’t do something because it is too radical. Richardson has always been running for VP, and it may be a done deal. At this point though, he doesn’t bring much to the table, and Obama takes a lot away from it, if he leaves. You may be right, and a year ago I thought the same thing, but I never would have guessed that Obama could pull together the constituency of kooks that support him, along with their money. I’m sticking with my Hellary/Obama guess, worthless as it might be.
How does Obama take anything if he sets out the election and pouts? Does anyone think blacks are going to vote anything other than straight dem? That’s MY thinking-the Clintons don’t NEED to take the ‘too radical’ risk of Obama to get the black vote. Richardson on the other hand speaks fluent espanol. And they DO need to make an effort to get that.