Librado Romero/The New York Times
Homer Jacobson, unhappy that creationists had cited his work.
1 posted on
10/25/2007 6:44:48 PM PDT by
neverdem
To: neverdem
I guess thats science right? I mean you don’t agree with what the data points to so you hide the data.
To: neverdem
Homer Jacobson, unhappy that creationists had cited his work.Imagine how God feels when scientists cite his work and don't even give Him credit!
3 posted on
10/25/2007 6:55:58 PM PDT by
DaveyB
(Ignorance is part of the human condition - atheism makes it permanent!)
To: neverdem
Either you
we came accidentaly/spontaneously from nothing, or we were created.
Either way, they are both beliefs! Beliefs require faith.
Evolutionism is a religion. You have to believe/have faith in an unproveable theory.
4 posted on
10/25/2007 6:58:52 PM PDT by
rawcatslyentist
(Hey Jessie, how much melanin do you have to have to form a socially acceptable lynch mob?)
To: neverdem
Intelligent Design makes Chistians look stupid.
5 posted on
10/25/2007 7:02:25 PM PDT by
billorites
(freepo ergo sum)
To: neverdem
I didn't have him, but he does look familiar. I was there at Brooklyn College a little over 20 years ago.
You wouldn't find too many conservatives there then (or now even).
7 posted on
10/25/2007 7:13:17 PM PDT by
Tanniker Smith
(When the dog bites, when the bee stings, when you're feeling bad -- Bush's fault)
To: neverdem
And this bigoted clown wishes to be called a scientist?
He gets the evoluny of the month for October.
28 posted on
10/25/2007 7:48:09 PM PDT by
editor-surveyor
(Turning the general election into a second Democrat primary is not a winning strategy.)
To: neverdem
LOL! The guy’s got plastic covering his fancy clocks, pics and furniture, to keep the bird shit off. I wonder if he wears boots in the house. LOL!
50 posted on
10/25/2007 8:15:56 PM PDT by
spunkets
("Freedom is about authority", Rudy Giuliani, gun grabber)
To: neverdem
I see that book burning is justified by the hardcore evolutionists. As long as it is for the CAUSE.
They love selective big government as long as it is for the CAUSE, and now they approve and applaud selective book burning. Stalin was more honest.
The hardcore evolutionist's ridiculous talk about objectivity and principles is the cheapest of the cheap. Pure hypocrisy.
64 posted on
10/25/2007 8:53:34 PM PDT by
Old Landmarks
(No fear of man, none!)
To: 21stCenturion
65 posted on
10/25/2007 9:11:40 PM PDT by
21stCenturion
("It's the Judges, Stupid !")
To: neverdem
Link to Jacobson's original letter
here , for whatever it's worth - at least he admits he was personally guilty of "bad science"......
To: neverdem
bmflr. I’ve never heard of someone retracting their work except when they found errors. That doesn’t appear to be the case with this finding.
72 posted on
10/25/2007 10:49:18 PM PDT by
Kevmo
(We should withdraw from Iraq — via Tehran. And Duncan Hunter is just the man to get that job done.)
To: neverdem
Wow, this is a new one on me. I didn’t even know that you could withdraw a paper after publication (beforehand, yes.)
Usually what happens is that the scientist writes another paper.
To: neverdem
So after 52 years, he has retracted it.So he is admitting he was wrong. Got it.
78 posted on
10/26/2007 11:06:12 AM PDT by
MEGoody
(Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson