Posted on 10/27/2007 8:40:41 PM PDT by Ooh-Ah
Senator Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign is gaining fans, even on the West Bank.
“I hope Hillary is elected in order to have the occasion to carry out all the promises she is giving regarding Iraq,” said Ala Senakreh, West Bank chief of the Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigade, a Palestinian terror group. “President Clinton wanted to give the Palestinians 98 percent of the West Bank territories. I hope Hillary will move a step forward and will give the Palestinians all their rights.”
Senakreh and other top Islamo-fascists want Hillary in the Oval Office. These mass murders also have “gone negative.” They want GOP contender Rudy Giuliani dead.
“We see Hillary and other candidates are competing on who will withdraw from Iraq,” said Abu Jihad of Al Aqsa’s Nablus unit. “This is a moment of glory for the revolutionary movements in the Arab world…”
Al Aqsa’s Nasser Abu Aziz, considered it “very good” that there are “voices like Hillary and others who are now attacking the Iraq invasion.”
Islamic Jihad’s Abu Ayman felt “emboldened” by Clinton’s demands that America retreat from Iraq. He said: “It is clear that it is the resistance operations of the mujahideen that have brought about these calls for withdrawal.”
“All Americans must vote Democrat,” insisted Jihad Jaara, an exiled Al Aqsa agent who commanded 2002’s siege of Bethlehem’s Church of the Nativity.
Since 1995, these terrorists’ organizations have killed an estimated 162 and wounded 368 others in Israel. Aaron Klein, an Orthodox Jew who is WorldNetDaily.com’s Jerusalem Bureau Chief, interviewed some three dozen leading Muslim fanatics, including those quoted here. His new book, “Schmoozing with Terrorists,” details these chilling encounters with violent Islamic extremists in Israel’s Palestinian territories.
Why do these hardened butchers have a soft spot for Hillary Clinton? Perhaps because the New York Democrat is soft on terrorism.
*Clinton rejects robustly interrogating terrorists even in “ticking time bomb” scenarios. In a September 26 Democratic debate, she said: “It cannot be American policy, period.”
*Clinton opposes the U.S. Terrorist Surveillance Program, calling it “a secret program that spies on Americans.”
*Clinton voted against military tribunals for terror suspects, including al-Qaeda detainees.
*Clinton has zigzagged on Iraq. In autumn 2002, she voted for Operation Iraqi Freedom. Last January 18, she told PBS: “I think the timetable still remains problematic” for leaving Iraq. But on February 17, she stated: “It’s time to say the redeployment should start in 90 days…”
Meanwhile, Clinton’s campaign has not responded to my request to list her counterterrorist accomplishments.
These terrorists’ love for Hillary mirrors their hatred for her leading GOP rival, Rudy Giuliani.
“If I had the occasion to meet him I would hurt him,” said Ramadan Adassi, a West Bank Al Aqsa leader. “For the sake of the American people, Giuliani shouldn’t be elected.”
“Giuliani doesn’t deserve to live or even to be mentioned,” said Al Aqsa’s Ala Senakreh. “He hates Palestinians and we hate him.”
Al Aqsa’s Abu Hamed said Giuliani “can hate Arafat and the Palestinians, but he knows that nobody is hated in the world more than his leadership, his party, his president, and his Zionist friends.”
Why the hard feelings? Perhaps because Giuliani has snipped terrorists’ bomb wires for 31 years.
*Mayor Giuliani’s NYPD officers in July 1997 arrested two Palestinians with Jordanian passports and five pipe-bombs. They were convicted of immigration fraud and plotting to blast Brooklyn’s Atlantic Avenue subway station.
*As New York City’s U.S. Attorney, Giuliani attempted in 1988 to close the Palestine Liberation Organization’s United Nations observer mission under the 1987 Anti-Terrorism Act.
*In 1986, Giuliani targeted an anti-Castro group responsible for two murders and 25 bombings. Giuliani secured guilty pleas from three Omega 7 members who conspired to kill Cuba’s U.N. ambassador in 1980 and blow up its Manhattan consulate in 1979.
*Giuliani represented the Justice Department on President Gerald Ford’s Cabinet Committee to Combat Terrorism in 1976.
“I don’t believe Americans should base their votes entirely on what the terrorists think,” Aaron Klein says from Jerusalem, “but it’s certainly telling that our enemies are rooting for the Democrats, particularly Hillary.”
As the War on Terror continues, Americans should study our foes’ political preferences -- and then pull the lever the other way.
Bump.
I hope Rudy turns this into a commercial
That's a lot of people who want(ed) him dead.
Isn’t it too bad that Rudy is a baby killer.
No, we should also consider the Chinese...
Whether Obama is a Moslem or not, he belongs to the United Christless Church and that is fully as bad.
And, yes, it is too bad he’s a baby killer and a serial adulterer. (Rudy, that is. Not sure if Obama is an adulterer or not.)
Rudy's nominated = 3rd party
LOL. Deroy is really dredging the bottom. This is weak.
I can’t believe the level he is going to sell this fraud.
to the top
Who would run on top a third party ticket? Pat “SS” Buchanan??
Not sure, but a 3rd party will automatically arise if Rudy's the nominee.
Rudy's nominated = 3rd party
and make it seem that ALL Republicans want to...
kill the 2nd Amendment...
kill the unborn...
kill REAL enforcement against illegals...
kill marriage as we know it, between a man and a woman...
etc., etc., etc.
Supporting and voting for a LIBERAL RINO for REPUBLICAN president will KILL our CORE VALUES and BELIEFS.
DON'T DO IT.
And so is the MSM doing its utmost to cover up those sentiments.
....which of course is why we're reading about this in Human Events, not the AP.
And that means you get HILLARY
And that means you get HILLARY
Reading the thread and many like it before, I’ve concluded it doesn’t matter. It’s not 1992, and there is no Ross Perot on the horizon with the perceived national credibility and cash to mount a serious third party.
Let the cranks go. It’s too much bother to retain them for too little payback.
Conservatives who won't vote for a pro-abortion, pro-gun control, pro-santuary city illegal alien enabler, who ruled NYC by encroaching on freedoms, appointed 80% democrat judges, surrounded himself with numerous corrupt cronies who were prosecuted and removed from office, borrowed his way through 2 terms, and left the state with larger deficits than when he took office despite the largest economic boom in recent history, are cranks?
Here's a thought: Voting for a liberal will get you a liberal! No thanks!
Stupid!
A Republican candidate cannot afford to lose even 1% in todays elections (See GWB lest you forget!).
If Rudy really wasn’t just about Rudy; If he was actually about some type of principle (which he ain’t) he would drop out and let a real Republican gain some momentum before the General Election. But he won’t and he won’t win the primary either.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.