Skip to comments.
...But At Least Clinton Was Willing To Say It
Townhall.com ^
| October 28, 2007
| Austin Hill
Posted on 10/28/2007 2:19:16 AM PDT by Kaslin
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-105 next last
To: Freedom of Speech Wins
DU is missing another idiot.
81
posted on
10/28/2007 7:23:05 AM PDT
by
Brytani
To: lowbridge
I was waiting to read that someone beside myself thought it was a plant.
82
posted on
10/28/2007 7:26:31 AM PDT
by
go-ken-go
(i)
To: pigsmith
Clintons message was quite clear indeed: dont you dare say such things about our country My Presidency.You are right on the money. Everything is all about him.
83
posted on
10/28/2007 7:43:55 AM PDT
by
Semper911
("We can stand here like the French, or we can do something about it." -Marge Simpson)
To: chiller
...a bit much? This has always been THE PLAN. Billy Blythe would be President for 8 years. Next Miss Hitlery would be President while he was Sec. Gen. of the UN. This goal they formulated many years ago. Billy’s sex addiction slowed them down, but they’re back on track.
84
posted on
10/28/2007 8:19:55 AM PDT
by
abclily
To: Kaslin
The scary thing is that this “inside job” viewpoint is WIDESPREAD among the Soros fringe of the Democrat party. I once infiltrated a DailyKos event in NYC, and was stunned to hear how many of them believed that 9/11 was a conspiracy by Bush for oil or Israel or both.
To: Kaslin
I agree with those posters on this thread and another yesterday who believe this was a set up by the Clinton campaign. Until we know the identity of the hecklers, as well as their backgrounds, I cannot accept that Clinton's reaction was anything but another political ploy to soften the impression that the TRUTHERS speak for the RATS, while making himself appear to be a strong authority figure, which he is not. Republicans need to sift everything that happens with the Clintons through a cynical, fool us once etc., lens. Their machine leaves nothing to chance, is calculated and moves unrelentingly toward their goal of electing Hillary to the Presidency.
Comment #87 Removed by Moderator
To: FReepaholic
Don’t confuse him with facts.
88
posted on
10/28/2007 10:40:29 AM PDT
by
CaptainK
(...please make it stop. Shake a can of pennies at it.)
To: John Valentine
Don't wish to join with those that say there is proof of complicity on the part of the Bush administration or that Muslims weren't responsible.
Rather wish to say there are many unanswered questions.
There also was apparently possibly deep intelligence penetration on the part of the terrorists.
Seems there should be more bipartisan support for the answers otherwise conspiracy theories will abound.
To: dearolddad
Exactly, what I have is just questions.
To: Freedom of Speech Wins
Give it a rest. Conspiracy theories will always abound because conspiracies are more comforting than the reality.
91
posted on
10/28/2007 9:36:05 PM PDT
by
durasell
(!)
To: lentulusgracchus
Thank you for the good information here.
Makes sense.
To: Lead Moderator
No, just undecided and don't feel like we have all the information or that we will get it anytime soon. Keep hearing different things from different people and don't know what to believe.
To: Kaslin
It was NOT an inside job!Uh oh, now I am suspicious.
Anything this SOB says is a lie.
94
posted on
10/28/2007 9:39:38 PM PDT
by
Rome2000
(Peace is not an option)
To: Cincinna
National Guard was activated in New York City in conjuction with the Millenium celebration for 12/31/99 effective earlier possibly due to a threat that existed.
Preparations for this began to be made that summer.
Government did a good job stopping those in Washington state as they crossed in.
To: Kaslin
I hope your right in terms of absolutely no complicity on the part of the puppet master . . . though I’m skeptical on that score.
But the notion that any of us should trust Dilldo Klintoon about anything is . . .
preposterous on it’s face, it seems to me.
Except . . . perhaps that he knows his wife uncommonly well . . . and when he tells who was it . . . Kathleen W . . . that his wife has [had more oral sex with women] than he has . . . I’m inclined to believe that.
96
posted on
10/28/2007 9:42:53 PM PDT
by
Quix
(GOD ALONE IS GOD; WORTHY; PAID THE PRICE; IS COMING AGAIN; KNOWS ALL; IS LOVING; IS ALTOGETHER GOOD)
To: durasell
More offensive should be the put options taken out on American Airlines stock which haven't been adequately explained.
Shows apparent possible foreknowledge on the part of someone possibly the terrorists.
A lot hasn't been explained.
Not saying that Cheney or Bush directed the whole thing as some of the truthers suggest or that just because they trained in Florida Jeb Bush is responsible.
Trying to say that there are some legit questions that these people bring up amidst the nonsense.
To: Freedom of Speech Wins
98
posted on
10/28/2007 9:47:20 PM PDT
by
durasell
(!)
To: Kaslin
Clinton said shut up and let me talk. Bill and Hillary sure did their share of talking about our national security - with Johnny Chung, Charlie Trie, John Huang.
Google: Clinton National Security Scandal and Coverup
99
posted on
10/28/2007 9:55:26 PM PDT
by
Mr Apple
To: skeptoid
Deep penetration of our intelligence could have taken place.
Government seems to have been afraid of this possiblity.
Also having a lot of information but not knowing specifics or how to stop it would explain a lot of things that took place.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-105 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson