Skip to comments.
Zogby Poll: 52% Support U.S. Military Strike Against Iran
Zogby International ^
| October 29, 2007
Posted on 10/29/2007 6:48:53 PM PDT by West Coast Conservative
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-78 next last
To: West Coast Conservative
Lets just do it and get it over with.
21
posted on
10/29/2007 7:21:27 PM PDT
by
Radix
(When I became a man, I put away childish things)
To: West Coast Conservative
.................A majority of likely voters 52% would support a U.S. military strike to prevent Iran from building a nuclear weapon,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
Yeah, but probably 80% of voters supported a strike in Iraq- that is before the first soldier bled from a boot created hangnail. Then it's Bush's fault, and impeach Cheney, screw Halliburton!
22
posted on
10/29/2007 7:23:19 PM PDT
by
aShepard
To: Brilliant
52% are complete idiots. Btw, the 48% with whom you agree reside almost exclusively on the left end of the political spectrum. But they're mostly just partisan fools who robotically oppose the President no matter what he does. You, unfortunately, have no such excuse.
23
posted on
10/29/2007 7:23:50 PM PDT
by
Mr. Mojo
(My other Telecaster is a Thinline)
To: West Coast Conservative
My obligatory post when the words "bomb" and "Iran" are used in the same sentence.
24
posted on
10/29/2007 7:25:44 PM PDT
by
Cobra64
(www.BulletBras.net)
To: West Coast Conservative
The other 48% must be high on socialist toxins known to cause the brain to stop thinking.
To: Nervous Tick
It means polls are crap. That’s my take anyway.
To: Anti-Bubba182
I have a feeling that it will be sooner than we think because I don't believe President Bush want's this going on to soon before the election and more or less want's this settled before the next President takes office.
If this takes place a month or 2 before the election, there will be to much turmoil.
We still need President Bush to do the mop up operations in Iran, and we can't leave that up to a President Mrs. Clinton ( God forbid ).. if that were to happen.
I think President Bush want's to take action soon, so he can make sure this is a successful mission and not leave lose ends hanging for the next President.
To: Man50D
He only has 14 months to do it in, and 12 months to do it before the elections, and I don't believe he want's this going on during or soon before the elections.
We might see it coming in the next 1 - 4 months.
To: Radix
Lets just do it and get it over with.President Bush is a genius at war strategy, perhaps the best wartime leader in world history. The Iranians are going to try to get out of the mess they are in. I think right now President Bush is setting a trap for the Iranians by eliminating all "peaceful" alternatives. When the time is just right, the president will clobber the Iranians even better than he is clobbering the Iraqis.
29
posted on
10/29/2007 7:42:01 PM PDT
by
tear gas
To: aShepard
Well, but 52% of voters let W keep his job. This poll substantiates that a hair more than half of Americans remember the Iranian hostage crisis, and don’t like the idea of them going nuke.
30
posted on
10/29/2007 7:45:18 PM PDT
by
txhurl
(Yes there were WMDs)
To: Wally_Kalbacken
Well, I hope you are right but rarely do wars go so easily.
31
posted on
10/29/2007 7:50:07 PM PDT
by
rahbert
To: popdonnelly
It will be the destruction of the Military/Industrial complex... this time their buddies the rooskies can pay for the cleanup.
LLS
32
posted on
10/29/2007 8:00:12 PM PDT
by
LibLieSlayer
(Support America, Kill terrorists, Destroy dims!)
To: Anti-Bubba182
I heard CH say that on
Special Report w/Brit Hume.
CH said Bush wouldn't want to leave it to a dem leader if that's the outcome of the '08 elections.
33
posted on
10/29/2007 8:00:49 PM PDT
by
rvoitier
To: Cobra64
To: cthemfly25
It is NOT 48%. 6 to 8% do not know what they think... and they are in EVERY poll!
LLS
35
posted on
10/29/2007 8:03:06 PM PDT
by
LibLieSlayer
(Support America, Kill terrorists, Destroy dims!)
To: gunnedah
40% of these would turn their backs if it took more than two days to settle the conflict.
Hey, it’s got to fit into a one hour slot.
36
posted on
10/29/2007 8:04:11 PM PDT
by
Joan Kerrey
(Believe nothing of what you hear or read and half of what you see.)
To: West Coast Conservative
21% would most like to see New York U.S. Sen. Hillary Clinton leading the countryI would love to ask a follow-up question: What, exactly, has Hillary Clinton done in the past to make you believe that she would be the most effective American leader in dealing with Iran? (Or anything else, for that matter.)
37
posted on
10/29/2007 8:05:00 PM PDT
by
TruthShallSetYouFree
(Abortion is to family planning what bankruptcy is to financial planning.)
To: gunnedah
I wonder who those just over 1000 would be voters they contacted? Did they phone over the staff of Moveon.org and all the lefty sites?
To: bobby.223
We won’t need to hit Iran...Israel will hit them first.
Israel hit Syria last month...where was the Islamic backlash?
To: West Coast Conservative
Zogby is a way left guy; only a liberal would trust what Zogby claims to be true. Proceed with caution!
40
posted on
10/29/2007 8:42:02 PM PDT
by
Rembrandt
(We would have won Viet Nam w/o Dim interference.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-78 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson