Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The most influential US Conservatives: 81-100
Telegraph.co.uk ^ | October 29, 2007 | Editorial Staff

Posted on 10/30/2007 2:38:56 AM PDT by Puzzleman

As the US prepares for what is arguably the most open presidential election since 1928, the last time there was no incumbent president or vice-president on the ballot, the Daily Telegraph's Washington correspondents compile a list of the 100 most influential Liberals and Conservatives in America...

(Excerpt) Read more at telegraph.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: conservatives; influence; republican; topten
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last
Britian's Telegraph is compiling a list of what is, in their opinion, our 100 most influential conservatives. This article gives the 20 who are at the bottom of the list. The rest of the list will be published over the next few days. (The link to a similar article for the most influential liberals is given near the top of this aricle.)
1 posted on 10/30/2007 2:38:58 AM PDT by Puzzleman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Puzzleman
Where's JR?

prisoner6

2 posted on 10/30/2007 2:44:51 AM PDT by prisoner6 (Right Wing Nuts hold the country together as the loose screws of the Left fall out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Puzzleman

LOL, what is Larry Craig doing on the list??? Craig had to be one of the least known Senators prior to his bathroom antics. Craig should not be on a list around such people as Coulter, Noonan, Jeb Bush, Malkin.


3 posted on 10/30/2007 2:55:46 AM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Puzzleman

BTTT


4 posted on 10/30/2007 2:56:46 AM PDT by Paperdoll ( Vote for Duncan Hunter in the Primaries for America's sake!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Puzzleman

Who was the incumbent president or vice president on the ballot in 1952?


5 posted on 10/30/2007 2:57:38 AM PDT by Past Your Eyes (Some people are too stupid to be ashamed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Puzzleman

Interesting - got an error message when trying to pull up the conservative list; no problem with the liberal side of things. Undoubtedly they’re being flooded with FReepers. /grin


6 posted on 10/30/2007 3:00:48 AM PDT by tgusa (Gun control: deep breath, sight alignment, squeeze the trigger .....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Past Your Eyes

Truman wouldn’t run so the Dems nominated Adlai Stevenson. Repubs ran Ike. No, I’m not old enough to remember - looked it up!


7 posted on 10/30/2007 3:03:48 AM PDT by tgusa (Gun control: deep breath, sight alignment, squeeze the trigger .....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Past Your Eyes

You’re right! In 1952, the Republicans ran Eisenhower and Nixon; the Democrats ran Stevenson and John Sparkman. None were incumbents.


8 posted on 10/30/2007 3:04:19 AM PDT by Puzzleman ("All that is necessary for evil to succeed is that good men do nothing." -- Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Past Your Eyes

Little remembered, but Harry Truman wanted to run for the 3rd term in 1952. He was so unpopular that defeat seemed likely, especially after Ike declared as a Republican candidate.

Estes Kefauver defeated Truman in the NH primary in early March. Machine Democrats despised the reformer Kefauver. Truman persuaded the reluctant Adlai Stevenson to run.


9 posted on 10/30/2007 3:23:05 AM PDT by iowamark (FDT: Some think the way to beat the Democrats in November is to be more like them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Puzzleman

why isn’t the focus of other countries not on one simple fact, the last major election in the USA was not to govern, but to produce campaigners for the next presidential election


10 posted on 10/30/2007 3:31:31 AM PDT by sure_fine (• " not one to over kill the thought process " •)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Puzzleman

The list of conservatives won’t open! Of course the Libbys are all there, WITH PICTURES.


11 posted on 10/30/2007 3:48:46 AM PDT by RoadTest ("The Lord bringeth the council of the heathen to naught" - Psalm 33, verse 10)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RoadTest

The conservative list 81-100 opens fine. The new one today of 61-80 may be a bad link, or a very busy server.


12 posted on 10/30/2007 5:00:14 AM PDT by RDasher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: tgusa; RoadTest

Of course, you just scroll down for the 81-100 list. The link to the 61-80 list is now working.


13 posted on 10/30/2007 5:11:51 AM PDT by Puzzleman ("All that is necessary for evil to succeed is that good men do nothing." -- Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: iowamark

Truman wasn’t on the ballot, whether he wanted to run or not. You don’t have to go back to ‘28 to find the situation that we are in now.


14 posted on 10/30/2007 5:43:28 AM PDT by Past Your Eyes (Some people are too stupid to be ashamed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: prisoner6

If Michelle Malkin and Erick Erikson are on there, you can best that JimRob will be on there. Probably ranked somewhere around Matt Drudge. Methinks Rush Limbaugh will be in the top ten, maybe even top 5


15 posted on 10/30/2007 6:18:40 AM PDT by ConservatismNow (Iran is just a fantastic natural resource crying out for new, more responsible owners.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ConservatismNow

RPaul, Savage, O’Reilly, Craig, Chertoff, and Kissinger???


16 posted on 10/30/2007 7:31:27 AM PDT by Ingtar (The LDS problem that Romney is facing is not his religion, but his Lacking Decisive Stands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Puzzleman; traviskicks; Extremely Extreme Extremist; billbears; Designer; OrthodoxPresbyterian

Yes, Ron Paul makes the list. As he should.


17 posted on 10/30/2007 7:35:13 AM PDT by George W. Bush (Apres moi, le deluge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Past Your Eyes

Truman was unpopular because he had just fired Gen. Douglas MacArthur from his Korean command. Ironic. Truman was attempting to chip away at MacArthur’s credibility so he wouldn’t be a threat in the ‘52 race
and instead, it ruined his own chances at reelection.


18 posted on 10/30/2007 7:52:27 AM PDT by Liberty Wins (Not only does Fred Thompson cut taxes, he cuts tax collectors.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Puzzleman

Interesting line up...

And how they are classified on the front page is a bit telling:

“Leaders on the Left: 61-80 81-100”
“Principal players on the Right: 61-80 81-100”

I am so glad the British media have a take on this...Like its going to really matter...

So the “Left” has “Leaders”, and the “Right” has “Principle players”...

Can anyone here recite any “Liberal Leaders” or “Principle players” in Great Britain besides that Tony Blair guy, and the transplanted Beckham’s???

And no the rest of the Spice Girls don’t count...

Like that really matters...

I do like how they are holding out on the 1-60 list on both sides of the aisle for now...By pulsing us, just in case they miss someone...

Should be interesting to see what they come up with...


19 posted on 10/30/2007 8:36:11 AM PDT by stevie_d_64 (Houston Area Texans (I've always been hated))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tgusa
Truman wouldn’t run so the Dems nominated Adlai Stevenson.

Sort of, Truman wouldn't run, Ike decided he was going to run as a republican, then they turned to Stevenson, but originally, both parties wanted Ike, and Ike chose the GOP.

20 posted on 10/30/2007 12:20:04 PM PDT by Sonny M ("oderint dum metuant")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson