Posted on 10/30/2007 2:54:17 PM PDT by RedRover
By all accounts, Colby Vokey is a model officer in the U.S. Marine Corps. He helped command an artillery unit in Kuwait during the Gulf War in 1991.
For the past four years, Vokey has served as chief of all the Corps' defense lawyers in the western United States — and he's played a key role in some of the military's most sensitive legal issues, including the murder investigation in Haditha, Iraq, and in the debate about detainees at the U.S. prison camp at Guantanamo Bay.
"Colby Vokey?" muses retired Col. Jane Siegel "Integrity almost seems like a word too small to describe him."
Says Lt. Col. Matthew Cord, "He's just one of the best."
So when Vokey announced recently that he wanted to leave the Corps, it said something troubling about the military system of justice that he's served for almost 20 years. Vokey charges that some commanders and officials in the Bush administration have abused the system of justice, and he's going to retire from the Corps May 1, 2008.
People who know him say that privately, Vokey has acknowledged he is "angry" and "bitter." Publicly, Vokey describes himself as "fed up. I think changes to the system are well-overdue," he told NPR. "And it's a little frustrating when you see problems are highlighted time and time and again."
Turning Points
So how did Vokey, who's stationed at Camp Pendleton in California, evolve from a gung-ho warrior — who helped command an artillery unit in Desert Storm — to a disillusioned officer?
Vokey says he can remember the exact moments that he decided to become a Marine, and then later, a Marine lawyer.
Just after he arrived as a freshman at Texas A&M, he met an officer in the Corps. "He was in his Marine uniform — the green trousers, the tan shirt, the ribbons, the rank, his hat," Vokey said. "Every time he made a movement it was sharp, it was crisp. You knew who was in charge. And it was him. He looked like he was one of the best. And I wanted to be one of the best."
Years later, after he had enlisted and fought in Desert Storm, Vokey got called to jury duty in a court-martial.
Vokey said it was a routine case against a Marine accused of writing bad checks. On the surface, he said, it resembled any trial in the civilian world -– there was a military judge, a military prosecutor, and a military defense lawyer, which the Corps always provides to defendants for free. But Vokey said when he and the other jurors began deliberating, he saw one of the biggest potential problems that can prevent service members from getting a fair trial: the senior officer on the jury tried to order everybody else how to decide the verdict.
"We walked into the deliberation room, closed the door, sat down and he said, 'All right, let's convict this guy. Let's get out of here'," Vokey said. "I said, 'Whoa, sir, I think we're supposed to talk about the evidence first.' And he said, 'Jesus Christ, you think this guy's not guilty?'"
Battles in the Courtroom
Vokey said that's when he decided to fight his battles in the courtroom -– to make sure that commanders never manipulate the system of justice.
Commanders have the power to do just that, if they wanted: The same commander who accuses a Marine of breaking the law might also pick the members of the jury, which will decide if the commander is right. And that same commander might supervise the lawyer who defends the Marine against his accusations.
But Vokey teaches his defense lawyers that they have to fight commanders with every legal weapon they've got, even if it makes commanders angry.
When he trains young Marine defense lawyers, he tells them "you have one loyalty, and that's to the client," Vokey said.
Top commanders said they appreciate and need courageous defense lawyers like Vokey.
"We are an American military," said Tom Hemingway, who retired earlier this year as Brigadier General and legal advisor at the Pentagon. "We're here to support American values, and one of the things that we have in our disciplinary system, as a requirement, is that the trial system be fair."
Hemingway said that if troops believed that commanders manipulate the system of justice, "it would destroy morale. You want people in an all-volunteer force to serve willingly," Hemingway said. "If they think the system is unfair, then they're not going to re-enlist."
Cases in Point
But Vokey says that is one reason he's feeling demoralized: he has fought cases in the past few years where officials have tried to sway the system.
For example, after officials filed criminal charges against eight Marines on the grounds that they were involved in massacring 24 unarmed civilians in Haditha, Iraq, the Corps assembled one of the biggest legal teams in recent history to prosecute the men. But Vokey says officials told him he had to use a much smaller team to defend them. "It made me very angry," Vokey says. "We didn't have the people and the tools that we needed to adequately defend these Marines. It really sends a message that the Marine Corp's trying to railroad these guys."
The prosecution argued that the Marines went on a senseless rampage; Vokey argued that the men fought against insurgents as they were trained to do, and when civilians tragically got caught in the way, officials decided to turn the troops into scapegoats.
After Vokey fought fellow officers over the issue, a key general gave him permission to organize a much bigger military defense team, which has persuaded military investigators to drop many of the original charges.
Vokey has also watched thousands of Marines come back to Camp Pendleton from the war in Iraq and Afghanistan. Some have developed post-traumatic stress disorder or other serious mental health problems, and then taken illegal drugs or refused to show up at the base. To punish them, commanders have kicked them out of the service, with few or no benefits.
Vokey says he agrees that commanders must punish soldiers who break the rules, or discipline would fall apart. But he says the system is too rigid and should blend discipline with compassion.
"What's upsetting is we've created the situation" by sending the Marines to war, Vokey said. "They fought for their country. And if we broke them, we should fix them."
Guantanamo Bay
The U.S. has imprisoned hundreds of "enemy combatants" at Guantanamo Bay, in a military legal system that Vokey denounces as "horrific." Vokey saw the system first-hand, when he agreed two years ago to defend a teenager there who had been charged with murdering a U.S. soldier in Afghanistan. Vokey said he knew the case would be difficult, but he discovered that the legal system at Guantanamo is a "sham."
Vokey said the military staff constantly harassed him and interfered with his defense work by making it difficult even to meet with his client or show his client the government's evidence against him. The teenager confessed to killing the soldier, but he told Vokey he confessed after being shackled for hours in excruciating positions and bombarded by screeching music and flashing lights.
FBI agents have reported seeing detainees treated in similar ways, and investigators at human rights groups have reported evidence suggesting that detainees are routinely abused.
Vokey calls the system "disgraceful."
"Anytime you want to subvert the rule of law to the power of a government, you've got a very bad thing brewing," Vokey told NPR. "As an officer in the Marine Corps I took an oath to support and defend the Constitution of the United States. And now we are perpetrating something that if any other country in the world was doing, we would likely step in and stop it."
Hemingway, who until recently was the top lawyer advising U.S. officials on how to handle detainees at Guantanamo, dismisses those charges. Hemingway said he has asked the staff to investigate complaints by detainees, including Vokey's client, and "we have found absolutely nothing to substantiate that." He added, "I know of no one in uniform who signed up to embarrass the United States of America by running a system that doesn't meet what we consider to be appropriate standards."
Vokey, undeterred, said the legal system at Guantanamo has left him feeling "disgusted."
'A Chilling Message'
When asked to identify exactly which officials in the military and the Bush administration he believes have abused the system of justice, Vokey avoids giving an answer. When pressed, Vokey went to his bookshelf, pulled out the Manual for Courts-Martial, and read from Article 88: "'Any commissioned officer who uses contemptuous words against the president, vice president, Congress'" and a list of other officials, he said, "'shall be punished as a court martial may direct.'"
"I need to be careful," Vokey said.
Given that he speaks out like that, Vokey said he was not completely surprised when an official at USMC headquarters called him recently to her office in Washington, D.C. and fired him as chief of defense counsels in the western United States.
Officials at the Corps would not give NPR an interview, despite repeated requests.
But when former Marine Corps lawyers heard about Vokey's firing, they were incensed. Siegel said Vokey's firing sent a chilling message that some officials don't want military lawyers to defend the Constitution too vigorously.
"I believe that Colby Vokey was pulled out of his position because he's doing too good a job," Siegel said. "I think that the people in Washington D.C. don't like that."
After Siegel and other well-known lawyers wrote a blistering letter of protest about Vokey's firing and lobbied top commanders at Marine headquarters, officials backed down and reinstated him. But critics say the Corps is just doing damage control because officials know that Vokey is planning to leave on his own.
Please do!
Prayers continue.
It’s time to get the PC JAG’s out of the war zones unless they’re with front line troops carrying rifles.
He lost me at that point.
That one sure has flown under the radar, hasn't it? I wonder if any of the papers will cover it.
I pray he will have adequate civilian lawyers.
This was on NPR about the start of Hensley’s trial.
Curt has made it safely to Kuwait.
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=16053190
One soldier has said it is part of a Pentagon-sanctioned strategy.
That’s not exactly true. There was testimony that special operations uses it. I’m not sure if I read it in the media or in a write-up of the trial, but I know it somehow or other.
Besides, it makes sense.
Curt told me that this program originated with one of the alphabet soup companies and was given to the AWG by them.
Curious he was warned to guard his statements about something that doesn’t even exist.
He sent a long, rambling e-mail, which tells me he is keyed up like a cat in a room full of rocking chairs.
The technique has been around for decades—if not forever. One Vietnam vet I know says they called it setting out “honeypots”.
Perhaps I should have said this new and improved version.
This is still amazing, to me, that the US gov’t is forcing a “murder” hearing in Iraq. This is so wrong to force family to go through this much effort and then pay for the additional cost just to try to support their loved one.
Nah, what you said is right on. The point is that we sent boys to stop an insurgency. And they’ve done the job.
But now many in the military establishment want to further their careers and prove their own moral superiority.
Beware the man who lives for self-congratulation. And that’s all I see coming out of the prosecution and their buttboys in the media.
Bump, for further contemplation.
Thanks for the links, Pat. Evan is indeed blessed to have such a strong family beside him.
I’m not sure, but I find it strange that a General Court is being held overseas. In the Navy, GCMs were sent Stateside, only Summary and Special were held within the Command. That’s from back in the 60’s, so they may have changed their procedures. Does a “Change of Venue” appear possible?
Sounds crazy to me. It forces the lawyers and their aides along with family members to travel overseas with all the additional costs associated. I don’t think it’s a cheap trip. Additionally, I imagine it limits accessability between the client, civilian lawyers, and JAG lawyers as they work on a defense. I have no idea why the venue is not stateside. One logical conclusion might be that it is a coercive tactic. This is a murder trial for goodness sake.
Of the three snipers involved in these incidents, Sandoval’s trial was completed in Baghdad, Hensley’s trial is currently underway, and Vela’s hearing is scheduled to start this weekend in Baghdad. BHfred would know more.
Question: Why did the chicken cross the road?
Chicken? Chicken? Who the hell said anything about a chicken?
There ain’t no chicken!
Even if there was a chicken, he must have been a free range chicken.
None of our chickens have orders to cross the road.
Wait, THERE AIN’T NO CHICKEN!
WHY, I OUGHT TO, OUGHT TO....... Get promoted!
IMO, they want to break these kids and bury them in a deep dark hole.
Evan’s art. 32 is rescheduled for Nov. 11.
All I can tell you is he has had an assful of the bullshit.
(bighead too)
Thanks for the ping on the Chessani thread RedRover.
Probably won’t post there as you are all probably pretty tired of my asinine ranting.
RESPECT to all, bhf
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.