Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/01/2007 4:44:24 AM PDT by vietvet67
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last
To: vietvet67

You can bet the DNC are concerned.

Hillary folds in an early debate. How would she do when the actual battle begins next year when votes actually count?

This flub on her part raises great concerns (behind the scenes) both for Team Hillary and the DNC. It raises the question: Is she going to be able to handle a run for the White House?


45 posted on 11/01/2007 5:41:24 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: vietvet67
>>>>Another Hillary supporter) said Russert “should be shot.”

Hildabeast supporters think journalists are not supposed to ask Hillary questions that she does not have pat, puff answers for.

With this performance and the lesbian stories, there will be something more, and big.

These stories always come in threes.

48 posted on 11/01/2007 6:02:56 AM PDT by MindBender26 (Having my own CAR-15 in Vietnam meant never having to say I was sorry......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: vietvet67
Those female voters are saying, “Sen. Clinton needs our support now more than ever if we’re going to see this six-on-one to try to bring her down,” Penn told those on the campaign call.

This raises the question how Hillary would stand up to muslim leaders in future negotiations. Muslim leaders certainly would not respect her gender.

51 posted on 11/01/2007 6:29:40 AM PDT by monocle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: vietvet67
Drudge headlines today:



DON'T SHOOT THE MODERATOR: DEBATE FALLOUT TURNS UGLY...
Tim Russert 'should be shot', Hillary supporter declares on conference call with top advisers...


54 posted on 11/01/2007 6:41:13 AM PDT by Miss Didi ("Good heavens, woman, this is a war not a garden party!" Dr. Meade, Gone with the Wind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: vietvet67

“Those female voters are saying, “Sen. Clinton needs our support now more than ever if we’re going to see this six-on-one to try to bring her down,””

Penn is extremely sexist. Calling female voters, ‘those’ and treating us like we are backing Hillary simply because she is a woman is highly offensive. I would never, ever vote for Hillary and I don’t know any women who will.


56 posted on 11/01/2007 6:46:19 AM PDT by imskylark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: vietvet67
The victimized female approach worked against Lazio. She might as well dance with the one who brought he by trying it again.
59 posted on 11/01/2007 7:22:02 AM PDT by Preachin' (Enoch's testimony was that he pleased God: Why are we still here?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: vietvet67

Instead of shilling for more money, why doesn’t she just answer the questions?


61 posted on 11/01/2007 7:26:01 AM PDT by Lee'sGhost (Crom! Non-Sequitur = Pee Wee Herman.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: vietvet67
He, Mantz and several supporters hinted repeatedly on the call that Clinton was unfairly targeted by Tim Russert, debate moderator and host of NBC’s “Meet the Press.”

He he--Made my day. Hillary is now the victim of the "Vast Left Wing MSM"! She's going to run out of people to victimize her!

62 posted on 11/01/2007 7:26:50 AM PDT by Neverforget01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: vietvet67

Clinton could try something new, something that will help her avoid stumbles and awkard inconsistant flip-flops, she could try telling the TRUTH.


64 posted on 11/01/2007 7:28:56 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: vietvet67

Her website had a new ad on it... showed all the mean men ganging up on her. Had the caption “Politics of Piling On”. Basically saying, they’re picking on the girl. If she can’t handle this how can she handle Imanutjob in Iran and the Norks....???????


65 posted on 11/01/2007 7:33:19 AM PDT by RayBob (If guns kill people, can I blame misspelled words on my keyboard?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: vietvet67

Tim Russert, if you’re reading this you did an outstanding job. Keep up the good work. It is your job to ferret out all of the dirty little secrets of all the candidates, male and female alike.


67 posted on 11/01/2007 7:37:31 AM PDT by Plains Drifter (If guns kill people, wouldn't there be a lot of dead people at gun shows?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: vietvet67
“Russert made it appear that President Clinton had done something new or unusual,” Penn said,

Is he referring to Bill Clinton, or is he just hopeful of Hillary?

76 posted on 11/01/2007 8:01:57 AM PDT by theDentist (Qwerty ergo typo : I type, therefore I misspelll. <br> "What happens if neutrinos have mass?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: vietvet67
"The criticisms followed Penn’s assertion that Clinton was “unflappable.” He also said criticisms from Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) and former Sen. John Edwards (D-N.C.) would backfire and that he was already “detecting some backlash,” particularly among female voters."

Let's see, in the liberal caste system, a black man has greater value and status than a white woman. Therefore, the backlash is an insidious, racist, and a well coordinated conspiracy to oppress minority rights.

77 posted on 11/01/2007 8:02:34 AM PDT by Free Vulcan (Fight the illegal Mexican colonizers & imperialist conquistadors! Long live the resistance!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: vietvet67

I love it when the former First Lady who very well may be the nastiest political infighter ever to hold that position, and maybe period, from the administration that pretty much introduced the 24/7 rapid-response war-room to modern politics, starts going “They HIT me!”

What a piece of work that woman is.


78 posted on 11/01/2007 8:05:32 AM PDT by RichInOC (Hillary Rodham Clinton is a lying slag.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: vietvet67
Russert made it appear that President Clinton had done something new or unusual

A former First Lady running for office isn't unusal???

86 posted on 11/01/2007 8:18:02 AM PDT by AppyPappy (If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: vietvet67

could this be why they’re ballooning the”secret” and “inappropriate” adulterous relationship with the Devil’s Advocate?


87 posted on 11/01/2007 8:21:03 AM PDT by Ancient Drive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: vietvet67
moderating was “an abdication of journalistic responsibility.”

Even the MSM can't protect hitlery from herself when she's out there unprotected from her handlers...

Hopefully, the sheeple will finally get a clue as they see the real hitlery. She can't stay under wraps and in her protection bubble throughout the campaign - I can't wait for a one on one with Fred Thompson - at 6'4", he would not only tower over her physically, but I have an idea he could trigger the "real" hitlery, alternately screaming and cackling, while he remains the unflappable, affable Fred...

It is a sight I long to see - I'll have the popcorn ready


93 posted on 11/01/2007 9:01:55 AM PDT by maine-iac7 ("...but you can't fool all of the people all of the time" LINCOLN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: vietvet67
The criticisms followed Penn’s assertion that Clinton was “unflappable.” He also said criticisms from Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) and former Sen. John Edwards (D-N.C.) would backfire and that he was already “detecting some backlash,” particularly among female voters. Those female voters are saying, “Sen. Clinton needs our support now more than ever if we’re going to see this six-on-one to try to bring her down,” Penn told those on the campaign call.

Ah yes! When in doubt, go into full blown victim mode like a good little liberal.

108 posted on 11/01/2007 11:13:04 AM PDT by avacado (Republicans Destroyed Democrats' Most Cherished Institution: SLAVERY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: vietvet67

“The criticisms followed Penn’s assertion that Clinton was “unflappable.” He also said criticisms from Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) and former Sen. John Edwards (D-N.C.) would backfire and that he was already “detecting some backlash,” particularly among female voters.”

I’m still laughing at this pathetic attempt at spin control. The Clinton camp is panicking so badly right now that they have probably decided to resport to the politics of personal destruction that she and her husband have praticed so well over the years. Look for all out warfare among Hillary, Obama and Edwards. Repubs should enjoy this immensely.


109 posted on 11/01/2007 11:14:38 AM PDT by moose2004 (You Can Run But You Can't Hide!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kermit the Frog Does theWatusi

She's a fighter with a few...anger management issues.

110 posted on 11/01/2007 11:17:07 AM PDT by HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson