1 posted on
11/01/2007 4:44:24 AM PDT by
vietvet67
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
To: vietvet67
“a-a-a-WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!”
2 posted on
11/01/2007 4:48:15 AM PDT by
LRS
(It's time to put Hillary on the 3:10 to Yuma...)
To: vietvet67
top advisers, doing damage control after the candidates debate performance Tuesday, told supporters on a conference call Wednesday that the campaign needed more money to fight back.
Isn't that just like the socialist Dems? Solve a problem by pumping in more money.
3 posted on
11/01/2007 4:50:43 AM PDT by
Man50D
(Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it!)
To: vietvet67
Instead of an issue based response, Nurse Rachet goes on the attack using the victim ploy this time.
4 posted on
11/01/2007 4:50:50 AM PDT by
Misschuck
To: vietvet67
She can’t handle a somewhat tough question by her FRIEND, TIM RUSSERT?? GOOD GRIEF!!! She’s not READY for PRIMETIME!
5 posted on
11/01/2007 4:51:03 AM PDT by
Suzy Quzy
(Hillary '08...Her PHONINESS is REAL!!!)
To: vietvet67
If people in this country fall for this “she is a woman and cannot be attacked as a man would”then this country will get exactly what it deserves and will pay a huge HUGE price for it’s “feel good, politically correct, let’s all join hands and sing 3 choruses of Kum Bi Ya” mindset
6 posted on
11/01/2007 4:51:07 AM PDT by
njrep
To: vietvet67
told supporters on a conference call Wednesday that the campaign needed more money to fight back. Calling all Chinese Dishwashers! Calling all Chinese Waiters!! Calling ALL Chinese Street Hawkers!!!
8 posted on
11/01/2007 4:54:10 AM PDT by
C210N
To: vietvet67
Hillary! does well... she needs more money.
Hillary! does poorly... she needs more money.
Hillary! does fair-to-middling'... she needs more money.
Hillary! takes the day off... she needs more money...
Is anybody else seeing a pattern here?
10 posted on
11/01/2007 4:56:46 AM PDT by
gridlock
(ELIMINATE PERVERSE INCENTIVES)
To: vietvet67
Those female voters are saying, Sen. Clinton needs our support now more than ever if were going to see this six-on-one to try to bring her down, Penn told those on the campaign call. As a female voter, I find that very insulting.
To: vietvet67
I watched a bit of the debate (God knows why?) but I noticed that in spite of Hillary’s poor showing, none of the others took advantage. Are the other candidates just as pathetic or are they just there to audition for the VP slot? Seems the other candidates missed a golden opportunity for themselves.
12 posted on
11/01/2007 4:59:41 AM PDT by
tips up
To: vietvet67
From the article;
Russert made it appear that President Clinton had done something new or unusual, Penn said, before adding that it is, in fact, an extremely confusing situation
I think there will be further clarification.
Was this a Freudian slip by Penn or was Russert talking about BJ’s motor-voter disaster?
15 posted on
11/01/2007 5:02:40 AM PDT by
Roccus
(Someday it'll all make sense.....maybe.)
To: vietvet67
Sen. Hillary Rodham Clintons (D-N.Y.) top advisers, doing damage control after the candidates debate performance Tuesday, told supporters on a conference call Wednesday that the campaign needed more money to fight back. "Yes, hello, is Ah Hsu there?"
"Bress yu!"
"No, I don't think you understand. Is Ah Hsu there?"
"Oh, bress you vedy much!"
"Please, I'm very impotant Senato fram New Yoke. Is Ah Hsu there?"
"Bress you vedy much. Bress you. Bress you."
"On nuts. Say this is Hillary. Put Hsu on the phone."
"Oh, I'm sowwy. Shoes outa side ah."
"Say, are you going to put Hsu on or not."
"We no put anybody on. We serious."
"Look I need some yen. Put Hsu on."
"We no put Hsu on. We wear slippa onry. We do yen to be numba one though. You helpee?
"Yes, I'll helpee. Is Hsu there. I need Hsu. Ah Hsuuu!
"Oh bress you vedy much."
"Hillary, there's a call for you on line six."
"Hello, yes... okay... well... ahhh... look if I knew Hsu, I'd tell you all I know, but I've never heard of the guy. Good bye."
"Hello, put Hsu on.
"We no put you on. We not put anybody on. We yen to be numba won though. We pay big money to be numba won. We likee the Crintons. They worth every penny. Say, you know Mrs Crinton?"
"Is Hsu there."
"Sorry, No Hsu here. We use slippa."
"Please put Hsu on the phone."
"Hey who is that... Herro! This is Hsu here."
"Oh thank God. This is Hillary."
"Hirry who... I don no no Hirry. Hirry sell me down riva."
21 posted on
11/01/2007 5:09:20 AM PDT by
DoughtyOne
(Mrs Crinton have Pay Feava. There she go now. "Ah Hsu Ahhh Hsu Ah Hsu!" Crintons worth every penny.)
To: vietvet67
I have to agree with Chris Matthews: “her debate book let her down.” Yeah, blame the “debate book”.
22 posted on
11/01/2007 5:09:37 AM PDT by
ReleaseTheHounds
("You ask, 'What is our aim?' I can answer in one word: VICTORY - victory - at all costs...")
To: vietvet67
"they expect attacks from Clintons rivals to continue, and she will need the financial resources to deflect their attacks." I guess this means those refund checks for illegal campaign donations are going to bounce.
To: vietvet67
While I agree that Hillary likely has the Democratic nomination sewed up, at the debate she revealed just how weak a candidate she will be when the race starts in earnest. It is one thing to pander to her base supporters and use George Bush as the scapegoat for everything seen wrong in America, but Bush is not running for President in 2008. Hillary will have to give more than talking points if she is to overcome her generally negative rating with mainstream voters. She also has a problem in straddling the wide gulf between the radical left who are now her party’s base and far more centrist or right leaning voters like the Reagan Democrats. Clearly she has not done this nor likely could anyone given how far left her party has turned.
29 posted on
11/01/2007 5:14:53 AM PDT by
The Great RJ
("Mir we bleiwen wat mir sin" or "We want to remain what we are." ..Luxembourg motto)
To: vietvet67
All nuanced statements aside, Hillary definitely demonstrated that once she loses her script, she’s doomed. She is unable to speak without words written by others.
When she does, she displays ignorance.
In a real debate, she can be tormented till she blows up.
31 posted on
11/01/2007 5:16:54 AM PDT by
bert
(K.E. N.P. +12 . Moveon is not us...... Moveon is the enemy)
To: vietvet67
Hillary is running out of trick cards to use.
32 posted on
11/01/2007 5:19:29 AM PDT by
freekitty
((May the eagles long fly our beautiful and free American sky.))
To: vietvet67
Sen. Hillary Rodham Clintons (D-N.Y.) top advisers, doing damage control after the candidates debate performance Tuesday, told supporters on a conference call Wednesday that the campaign needed more money to fight back. To a Marxists Dimocrat, the ANSWER to FIXING everything, every problem, is MORE MONEY.
38 posted on
11/01/2007 5:24:08 AM PDT by
RetiredArmy
(The Marxist's Dimocrat Party: Party for and by terrorists, Marxists, Socialists and Homos.)
To: vietvet67
I wouldnt say she lost her cool, one caller said. But I would say she lost her footing.
Wrong. It's neither. She lost her
shield. She lost her
aura of media protection. And she's going to be losing that more and more as she heads into the first real campaign of her life.
What until the general election, Beastie Dearest. Wait until the general election. Your shields will fail completely. Your true Klingon nature will be revealed. You will be centered in the sites of our laser torpedos. You are doomed!
To: vietvet67
41 posted on
11/01/2007 5:26:39 AM PDT by
Bon mots
To: vietvet67
Sen. Hillary Rodham Clintons (D-N.Y.) top advisers, doing damage control after the candidates debate performance
Lady Rodham's absence from the cameras/mics is noticeable.
She should be out in front on this issue. She isn't. Her staff is.
That does not bode well for a wannabe future president -- to be hiding.
Where is Hillary?
Why isn't Hillary addressing this?
Would a President Hillary run and hide and send staff out to address any conflagrations or oppositions?
Ears Osama has been told to toughen up. Lady Rodham needs to do the same, as the real race has not even begun.
43 posted on
11/01/2007 5:37:50 AM PDT by
TomGuy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson