Posted on 11/02/2007 6:09:01 AM PDT by Wiz
Rome, 1 Nov. (AKI) - A Vatican-backed historian has attacked the film "Elizabeth: The Golden Age" for being a distorted anti-papal travesty that risks dividing the West in the face of Islam.
Professor Cardini, who holds the chair of medieval history at Florence University and formerly taught at the Lateran University in Rome, a Vatican body, said the film aimed to secularise and de-Christianise Europe.
The film, starring Cate Blanchett in the lead role, charts the latter years in the life of England's Tudor queen, Elizabeth, and the role of religion that led the Protestant monarch to war against Spain's Catholic King Phillip II.
Directed by Indian director, Shekhar Kapur, the film opened the Rome Film Festival in October and is tipped to score several Oscar Award nominations.
According to The London Times, Cardini wrote in Avvenire, the official organ of the Italian Bishops Conference, that the film formed part of a concerted attack on Catholicism by atheists and apocalyptic Christians.
Cardini said a film which so profoundly and perversely falsifies history cannot be judged a good film.
He said it has failed in its potential to offer a contribution to the understanding of a moment of vital importance. Instead, the Virgin Queen was portrayed as an able politician and courageous sovereign while King Philip II of Spain was shown as a ferocious, fanatical Catholic".
(Excerpt) Read more at adnkronos.com ...
ping
IIRC it was Phillip who went to war against Elizabeth- everything I've heard about it says Spain was the aggressor here.
“Professor Cardini, who holds the chair of medieval history at Florence University and formerly taught at the Lateran University in Rome, a Vatican body, said the film aimed to secularise and de-Christianise Europe.”
ONE film can do all that? Wow!!!
It's funny that the film industry aggressively revises the standard version of history in all matters - except when the standard version of history reviles the Catholic Church.
We won't see Edmund Campion in the movies any time soon.
I am particularly taken aback by the assertion (in the movie) that the Spanish Armada “carries the Inquisition”. That’s rather dumb and unsustained historically. Hollywood made-up history strikes again.
Funny, when people make up things about certain events in WWII, they are jailed. Apparently, some historical events are more equal than others.
Ah, the Black Legend.
Blanchett's portrayal of the queen in the first "Elizabet 1" was brilliant and all attempts at subsequent movies fall flat.
I seldom go to the theater, preferring to wait for the video - but I will go out for this one...and then buy the DVD for home -
a concerted attack on Catholicism "Concerted attack" - or daring to bring out the dark, "inconvenient history" of the times...
Were it not for Queen Elizabeth 1, our history would be very different - we could all be speaking Spanish
(Love her pearls)
..
Transformers was the best movie of the year, hands-down.
The lady they got to play Mary Stewart wasn’t bad looking.
Quote from the article: “A Vatican-backed historian has attacked the film “Elizabeth: The Golden Age” for being a distorted anti-papal travesty that risks dividing the West in the face of Islam.”
You don’t have to be backed by the Vatican, nor even a historian to know the film is fiction and not factually based. The previous film was as well.
I saw the film and liked it quite a lot. Great costumes, and some (fairly accurate) history thrown in. That the facts of the story don’t look good for the Catholic Church is not bigoted. The Spanish presumed to interfere in English politics, and got the Catholic Church involved in their dynastic and material ambitions. Period. They got whacked for it and it resulted in the decline of their empire.
It’s basically just another rehashing of the “Leyenda Negra”- the English-inspired “Black Legend” that villifies Spain and the Catholic Church.
So its a dramatization. The basic outline of the story is correct. Object to some of the characterizations if you will, but the simple facts are that the Spain attempted to invade England and lost.
You wrote:
“The trial of Mary Stewart certainly had it’s moments, but was a lot fairer than many caught up in the Spanish Inquisition (and some in the Holy Inquisition).”
Uh, no. Everyone knew Mary would be convicted and put to death. Your chances of being put to death after an inquisition trial, on the other hand, were small and it was never assumed you would be convicted. Mary, for instance, had no chance to strike testimony or “evidence” against her, while those tried by the inquisition were interviewed as to who their enemies were and testimony of those enemies was discounted by the court as to the guilt of the defendent.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.