1 posted on
11/07/2007 3:39:54 PM PST by
SmithL
To: SmithL
Yeah we should really listen to our blood foes for advise on how the election is shaping up.
What should we do next, tune in to Radio Tehran to hear how the war is going?
2 posted on
11/07/2007 3:44:07 PM PST by
MNJohnnie
(Pacifism is not moral. True morality requires evil be opposed, not appeased)
To: SmithL
>Right Splinters on GOP Field
It will be wicked
if the "Evangelicals"
whine and whine and whine,
finally stay home
and don't vote, but somehow still
Republicans win.
To: SmithL
"I don't think evangelicals have coalesced around any candidate," he said Wednesday in Washington, with Giuliani at his side. "I just believe that I needed to make a statement, and I am speaking for myself, that ... Rudy Giuliani is, without question, an acceptable candidate."
Right Rudy is the ONLY one that can save us from the muslims
Robertson is either a complete boob or sold out
4 posted on
11/07/2007 3:49:14 PM PST by
uncbob
(m first)
To: SmithL
We have seen something of a conservative leadership vacuum in the 20 years since Reagan. Messers Robertson, Brownback, and Weyrich are showing, by their poor judgment, why they were were never able to lead.
The majority of the conservative base has lined up behind Fred Thompson. The liberals are terrified of him, which should only increase our esteem for Fred.
6 posted on
11/07/2007 3:52:12 PM PST by
iowamark
To: SmithL
Pat Robertson’s audience will not follow him on this one.
And everyone knows that Pat’s age has affected his public proclamations for some time now.
8 posted on
11/07/2007 4:10:03 PM PST by
xzins
(If you'll just agree to the murdering of your children we can win the presidency!)
To: SmithL
Today, discord within the movement may run deeper than in the 1990s. The Christian right is maturing and has a new generation of leaders interested in issues beyond abortion and gay marriage, such as the environment and Darfur violence. By "maturing? they mean the movement has been corrupted and I wash my hands their corruption.
I stopped donating to the evangelical movement a few years ago and will NOT give them a dime any longer.
To: SmithL
I have no problem with the splintering at this point in time. However when we do pick a nominee I hope we can all get back together and back whoever it is. From the postings I have seen on FR I have doubts this will happen.
To: SmithL
12 posted on
11/07/2007 4:16:30 PM PST by
Cacique
(quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat ( Islamia Delenda Est ))
To: SmithL
All the candidates are flawed in the eyes of the Christian right...All have sinned, and come short of the glory of God.
All that is necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing.
The Lord will NOT be returning to run for POTUS. Staying home or voting third party only assures evil of victory. But then, who knows His will? Maybe evil is supposed to win this one, to begin the End Times.
19 posted on
11/07/2007 5:00:51 PM PST by
JimRed
("Hey, hey, Teddy K., how many girls did you drown today?" TERM LIMITS, NOW!)
To: SmithL
Anyone who genuinely believes a pro-illegal immigration, pro-”sanctuary city” stance (such as Giuliani’s) does anything to enhance their safety from terrorist attacks is — plainly and simply — too bone stupid to be allowed to vote, come Election Day.
28 posted on
11/07/2007 5:43:16 PM PST by
KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
("Ron Paul and his flaming antiwar spam monkeys can Kiss my Ass!!" -- Jim Robinson, 09/30/07)
To: SmithL
“Rudy Giuliani is, without question, an acceptable candidate.”
Now there’s a ringing endorsement. I rank it somewhere around “I think my left kidney is still working”.
To: SmithL
I really believe that Pat Robertson, Sam Brownback and Paul Weyrich have all capitulated to pressure from the MSM because of the immediacy of the Iowa and New Hampshire primaries.
I'm disgusted with their lack of backbone - but hey, I guess I didn't believe any of them really had backbone anyway.
To: SmithL
If it’s Fred or Hunter, I’ll not only vote, I’ll campaign.
If it’s McCain or Romney or Huckabee, I’ll have to hold my nose but I will without doubt vote for them against the Hildebeast.
If it’s Rudy, I won’t vote on the Presidential race. Sorry. Just can’t do it.
And before someone wants to take me to task as some evangelical fundie purist... I’m actually agnostic. I just think Rudy will destroy the conservative movement in a way Hillary never could.
Qwinn
38 posted on
11/08/2007 5:30:00 AM PST by
Qwinn
To: SmithL
Hillary and fellow communist hope for a totally split conservative vote, that gives her the White House with about 32% of the vote.
40 posted on
11/08/2007 5:31:58 AM PST by
RetiredArmy
(The Marxist's Dimocrat Party: Party for and by terrorists, Marxists, Socialists and Homos.)
To: SmithL
Me, I am an “anyone who can beat Hillary” voter right now and I am tired of big spending compassionate conservatism. Really tired. Give me Giuliani, Romney, or Thompson, whoever it may be. I won’t stay home or withold money because he doesn’t ring all the religious right’s bells.
43 posted on
11/08/2007 3:38:52 PM PST by
Delacon
(“The attempt to make heaven on earth invariably produces hell ” Karl Popper)
To: SmithL
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson