Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

France Loses Out as Saudis Sign $2.2 Billion Deal for Russian Helos
defense-aerospace.com ^ | Nov. 2,2007 | Giovanni de Briganti

Posted on 11/08/2007 8:42:53 PM PST by sukhoi-30mki

France Loses Out as Saudis Sign $2.2 Billion Deal for Russian Helos (Updated)

(Source: defense-aerospace.com; published Oct. 30, 2007)

(Edited Nov. 2 to add Eurocopter denial after paragraph 4)

By Giovanni de Briganti

PARIS --- In an abrupt policy shift, Saudi Arabia has signed an agreement to buy over 150 Russian-made Mi-35 Hind and Mi-17 Hip helicopters worth over $2.2 billion, ending French hopes of sealing a long-delayed sale of 148 helicopters and raising doubts about future French arms sales to the Saudi kingdom.

Sources say the Memorandum of Understanding with Russia was signed in Ryad in mid-September by members of the private cabinet of Saudi King Abdallah bin Abd al-Aziz Al Saud, and follows extended visits to Russia by Saudi military delegations in February and March 2007 to appraise the capabilities of Russian helicopters and other weapons.

The sources also said that Saudi Arabia appears to have decided to buy T-90 main battle tanks and medium-range air-defense systems from Russia, replacing previous plans to buy French-made Leclerc tanks and Aster 30 SAMP/T air-defense systems. No agreement has yet been signed for these systems, however.

Eurocopter confirmed that Saudi Arabia has opted for Russian helicopters, but said the company’s future prospects in the country remained unclear.

[Eurocopter denied Nov. 2 that the company had confirmed the agreement, to which it is not a party and of which it has not been officially notified.]

Nexter, manufacturer of the Leclerc tank, and missile maker MBDA had no comment on the status of their dealings with Saudi Arabia.

While conceding that the Saudis had signed an agreement to buy Russian utility helicopters, a French official told defense-aerospace.com that the Mi-17 and Mi-35 met only part of the Saudi requirement. Noting that the two Saudi customers – the Armed Forces and the National Guard - would not necessarily buy the same equipment, he said that France was still in the running to sell several other helicopter types. These include naval, Combat Search And Rescue and training helicopters, he implied, for which Russian helicopters are unsuited.

Saudi Arabia’s decision to retain Russia as a major arms supplier is the result of two recent policy decisions made by King Abdallah bin Abd al-Aziz Al Saud. One was Abdallah’s decision to take direct control of major arms purchases, which were previously largely the domain of the defense and aviation ministry headed by Prince Sultan Bin Abdulaziz, the Saudi Crown Prince and deputy prime minister who is also Abdallah’s half-brother. Sultan is said to be out of favor.

Abdallah also is loosening arms ties with France because of its insistence on large, multiple-system packages, and its stubborn arm-twisting to include weapons that the Saudis do not want, like the Rafale combat aircraft, in these packages.

While the Saudis were willing as late as the fall of 2006 to sign two or three medium-sized helicopters deals, covering 42 Fennec light helicopters, 20 Cougar Combat Search and Rescue helicopters and 10 NFH-90 naval helicopters, sources say they indefinitely postponed these plans after French officials continued to insist that the package also include Rafales, several FREMM frigates and Gowind corvettes, and Leclerc tanks.

“The idea of selling comprehensive packages was pushed by the Elysée [the French President’s office-Ed.] as a final coup for [former President Jacques] Chirac,” one industry official told defense-aerospace.com. “Now, Chirac’s gone, we’ve signed nothing, and we’re shut out of the Saudi market for the foreseeable future. A real success for France,” the official said.

France has now conceded it will not sell Rafale to Saudi Arabia. “We haven’t discussed Rafale in Saudi Arabia. It’s not a current issue,” French Defense Minister Hervé Morin said Oct. 28 in Jeddah, after talks with Saudi leaders.

[France is hoping that Libya, which has contracted to upgrade its obsolete Dassault Mirage F-1 fighters, may also agree to buy the Rafale, and an agreement could be announced during Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi’s forthcoming visit to Paris, possibly in December.]

The Saudis are also said to be unhappy with what they perceive as French snubs. These include the French government’s failure to appoint an official of sufficiently high rank to head Sofresa, the arms export agency especially set up to handle contracts with Saudi Arabia. France’s use of local marketing networks that include individuals that are “persona non grata” at King Abdallah’s court is seen as another snub.

France’s insistence on stuffing as many weapons as possible into arms deals has also been cited as one of the reasons why Morocco finally opted to buy the U.S.-made F-16 fighter instead of the Rafale, which Paris wanted to supply in a single package together with helicopters and corvettes.

Another factor is that the election in May of Nicolas Sarkozy to succeed Chirac as French president has not gone down well with the Saudis, who take exception at his declarations that French diplomacy would in future distance itself from its traditional pro-Arab stance.

The loss of the Saudi contracts, whose total value was estimated at well over 7 billion euros, is a severe loss for French industry, which is encountering growing difficulties in exporting its weapons in the face of cut-throat competition from the United States and Russia.

Paris is now making a last-ditch attempt to salvage at least some Saudi deals, and President Sarkozy’s planned visit to Saudi Arabia, in January, might constitute such an opportunity. The sale of several Airbus tanker aircraft, and possibly of a reconnaissance satellite which Saudi Arabia would share with Qatar and the United Arab Emirates, are two possibilities.

The sale of Fennec light helicopters, which the Saudis need for pilot training, may finally go through simply because there is no direct Russian competitor, sources say, noting however that this sale is only worth about 300 million euros.

-ends-


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Russia
KEYWORDS: aerospace; armsbuildup; france; greedyfrogs; russianmilitary; saudiarabia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

Mi-35

1 posted on 11/08/2007 8:42:56 PM PST by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
Mi-17

2 posted on 11/08/2007 8:52:38 PM PST by Westlander (Unleash the Neutron Bomb)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Why would they not be buying American equipment? Bribery anybody?


3 posted on 11/08/2007 8:52:40 PM PST by MSF BU
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

That’s interesting. You might have also noticed that the US dollar is going down and that some US defense contractors and overseas clients might get happier with that. :-)


4 posted on 11/08/2007 8:53:06 PM PST by familyop (cbt. engr. (cbt.)--has-been)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MSF BU
"Why would they not be buying American equipment? Bribery anybody?"

The costs are very high to foreign buyers, but that's changing as the dollar equalizes with other currencies.
5 posted on 11/08/2007 8:54:23 PM PST by familyop (cbt. engr. (cbt.)--has-been)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MSF BU; familyop

They still buy truckloads of American toys.They are reengining their F-15s & are looking at AEGIS equipped versions of the Littoral Combat ship as well as anti-ballistic missile systems among other things.Since Sept.11,the Saudis have been wary of putting all their eggs in the Yankee basket.Money has never been a problem for them.


6 posted on 11/08/2007 8:59:12 PM PST by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Somebody in DC needs a kick in the can.

Why shouldn’t the Saudis buy from us, since we’ve been protecting their worthless asses for all these years?

If the Saudis had US made copters and tanks, we could co-ordinate any ground defense of their sandbox much more easily.

And we could have had a way to recycle those petrodollars back to our shores.

But no—these useless camel humpers have to go buy non US arms—and from our budding enemy and former enemy, Russia.

We’ve had 34 years to make ourselves energy independent and look at us—importing more oil than ever.

The Saudis should be returned to their traditional past—as eternally wandering nomads in the desert. Whio needs friends like these?


7 posted on 11/08/2007 9:03:23 PM PST by exit82 (I believe Juanita--Hillary enabled Juanita's rapist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Why buy a Hind when you can get an Apache. Are the Russians going to start advising SANG next?


8 posted on 11/08/2007 9:03:46 PM PST by MSF BU
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MSF BU

They already have Apaches.


9 posted on 11/08/2007 9:04:59 PM PST by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: MSF BU

Incl. Longbow Variants.

The Hinds are much cheaper,can carry a range of Western electronics/weaponry & also a few troops.Good for heavy anti-terror work.


10 posted on 11/08/2007 9:07:31 PM PST by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: exit82

They’ve already reverse engineered the stuff we’ve sent them, they need other stuff to bribe the chinese with in case things go south with us.


11 posted on 11/08/2007 9:09:21 PM PST by utherdoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Westlander

...is that the pilot jumping out?


12 posted on 11/08/2007 9:14:35 PM PST by taxed2death (A few billion here, a few trillion there...we're all friends right?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MSF BU

You can’t carry eight grunts in addition to the crew in an Apache but you can in a Hind.


13 posted on 11/08/2007 9:32:23 PM PST by A.A. Cunningham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: MSF BU

Why would they not be buying American equipment? Bribery anybody?

Seeing these are Saudis we're dealing with, I would bet they go with whoever gives them the most money. Why should we sell them stuff anyway? They'll turn around and fund some terrorist group or donate to Western mosque-building projects with the money we gave 'em. Our dear friends aren't to be trusted...they can go pound sand. They've got a lot of it to work with...
14 posted on 11/08/2007 9:39:18 PM PST by G8 Diplomat (Pelosi--pissed off Turkey, supported SCHIP, really jerky, and full of sh|t)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Westlander
A French Cougar Mk. 2.


15 posted on 11/08/2007 10:08:21 PM PST by endthematrix (He was shouting 'Allah!' but I didn't hear that. It just sounded like a lot of crap to me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MSF BU
Why buy a Hind when you can get an Apache. Are the Russians going to start advising SANG next?

Two reasons:1) They are already in possession of Apaches. 2) A Hind can do a lot of what the Apache can do, and at the same time transport a number of soldiers (unlike the 2 man Apache).

16 posted on 11/08/2007 10:09:50 PM PST by spetznaz (Nuclear-tipped Ballistic Missiles: The Ultimate Phallic Symbol)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

bkmarked, Thanks.


17 posted on 11/09/2007 12:27:10 AM PST by happinesswithoutpeace (You are receiving this broadcast as a dream)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
the Saudis have been wary of putting all their eggs in the Yankee basket

Cant fault them on that.

18 posted on 11/09/2007 1:40:54 AM PST by valkyry1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
That is one mean mofo. Carries a squad of troops to boot.

The Saudis probably get a lot more bang for the buck buying the Russian tanks. But for aviation, I think they should go more to the French offerings, save for the Mi-35.

The Mi-35, we should buy a bunch of those. They will do the job of the V22 for a whole lot cheaper, and most likely, more effectively.

19 posted on 11/09/2007 1:46:59 AM PST by valkyry1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: valkyry1

If you’d think of replacing the V-22 with an Mi-35,well you might as well go for an armed S-70 variant(which already exists).While cheaper,none of these helicopters will match the V-22 in it’s range,payload & speed in special operations.


20 posted on 11/09/2007 3:05:22 AM PST by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson