Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

THhat's a pretty big veto override from both Houses. Deeper in the article, it mentions that a water bill is supposed to be passed every 2 years, but one hasn't been passed for 7, so this one is making up for lost time.
1 posted on 11/09/2007 10:27:31 AM PST by doc30
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: doc30

Jason Lewis (In for Rush) said the Army Corps asked for $5 billion. The Senate larded that into $12 B, the house $13B. They compromised in the conference committe by adding the two together and added another $billion to come up with $26B.


2 posted on 11/09/2007 10:31:55 AM PST by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: doc30
Senate rejects Bush veto [water projects with lots of pork]

There! Fixed the title!

3 posted on 11/09/2007 10:32:25 AM PST by 50mm (Inside every cynical person, there is a disappointed idealist - G. Carlin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: doc30

Too bad we don’t have any more like David Crockett in congress.

http://www.theadvocates.org/christian/crockett.html

ruefully...


4 posted on 11/09/2007 10:33:40 AM PST by petro45acp (NO good endeavor survives an excess of "adult supervision" (read bureaucracy)!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: doc30
“so this one is making up for lost time.”

No it is not. The Corps of Engineers said they needed 5 Billion. The House and Senate added 18 BILLION in pork to it. That is why Bush vetoed it. Think about that for just a minute, a more than 300% markup. How much longer can we afford this? Bush was right to veto this pork laden bill, but politics as usual won the day. What a shame.

5 posted on 11/09/2007 10:41:58 AM PST by MPJackal ("From my cold dead hands.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: doc30

While I don’t agree with the bill, I have no problem with Congress passing a bill over a president’s veto. They are fully empowered to do it under the Constitution. Love that Taft-Hartley Act!! Bush won’t hold any responsibility for this one!!


7 posted on 11/09/2007 10:55:29 AM PST by cotton1706
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: doc30

Duncan Hunter voted in favor of the override. How disappointing.


9 posted on 11/09/2007 11:00:02 AM PST by demshateGod (Duncan Hunter for president)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: doc30

Passage of this bill doesn’t really mean anything, Bush still has one last veto- his “Border Fence” veto. The money don’t get spent till HE spends it.


10 posted on 11/09/2007 11:02:44 AM PST by matthew fuller (Crop-circles, killer rabbits and UFO'S are caused by GLOBAL WARMING!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: doc30

So what happened to George? Does he not feel well?

For at least the first 4 years and more, he and the congresscrooks spent MY/OUR money in obscene amounts. Bush was always too glad to sign off on OUR money and give it away in truckloads all around the world.

As Hillary said: “We are going to take things away from you for the Common Good.”

This already happened almost 7 years ago.

So what else is new other than it appears George is suddenly not feeling well.


12 posted on 11/09/2007 11:18:05 AM PST by GatĂșn(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson