Posted on 11/13/2007 6:57:54 AM PST by Cat loving Texan
Spying on lover's e-mail? Monitoring may be illegal Austin police have charged two recently with activity.
By Tony Plohetski AMERICAN-STATESMAN STAFF Tuesday, November 13, 2007
Shawn Macleod wanted to know where his estranged wife was going on the Internet and what she was writing in e-mails, investigators said, so he secretly installed a program called SpyRecon on her computer that sent him electronic logs with the sites she had visited and messages she had sent.
His spying resulted in a four-year prison sentence.
Software programs created to monitor computer activity have grown in popularity in recent years as parents have sought ways to prevent children from accessing adult Web sites or e-mailing possible predators and as businesses have tried to curtail the time employees spend on the Internet when they are at work.
Others, too, have found a use for the software: Scorned lovers can track where their spouses or partners go online, whom they are e-mailing and what they are saying — all possibly in violation of the law.
Austin police considered Macleod's actions tantamount to illegal wiretapping and charged him with unlawful interception of electronic communication, a second-degree felony that can carry a 20-year sentence. Macleod pleaded guilty in May.
"It's pretty alarming," said Macleod's attorney, Johnny Urrutia.
Urrutia said he would be surprised if his client knew that what he was doing was against the law.
Doug Fowler, president of SpectorSoft Corp., which manufactures an Internet monitoring program called eBlaster, said law enforcement agencies nationwide have in recent months sought company records during criminal investigations, hoping the documents would show who installed the software on victims' computers.
In New York this year, a sheriff's deputy was found guilty of eavesdropping after investigators said he spied on the computer activity of a neighbor he thought posed a threat to young girls in their neighborhood.
The deputy was sentenced to five years of probation.
In California, a man was indicted on federal charges in 2005, accused of manufacturing, advertising and sending a program called Lovespy.
In that case, victims received an electronic greeting card that, when opened, would record e-mail messages and the Web sites they visited.
Austin police in recent months have charged two men, including Macleod, with the crime. The second case, filed last month, is pending.
Detective Darin Webster, who works in the department's high-tech crime division, said investigators also have looked into several other cases that didn't result in charges because the evidence had been destroyed or they couldn't conclusively determine who had installed the spyware.
"The problem itself isn't the software," Webster said. "The problem is how the software is being used. ... And in the cases I've seen, there are warnings on there that it may be against the law. In Texas, it is."
State law says it is illegal to intentionally intercept spoken or electronic communication.
The law grants some exceptions, such as to switchboard operators who might hear part of a conversation while doing their job.
The law doesn't address certain questions about computer spyware, such as whether it is legal to install the equipment on a jointly owned computer without the consent of the second owner.
Employers typically have workers sign waivers acknowledging that they know the company computers are monitored.
Parents, as guardians of their minor children, are allowed to monitor their children's activities.
According to court records, Macleod's estranged wife, Kristy, reported to police in August 2005 that she suspected he was monitoring her computer use.
A detective using a fake name sent Kristy Macleod an e-mail offering to buy the couple's pool table.
A few days later, Shawn Macleod confronted Kristy Macleod about the e-mail, according to a probable cause affidavit.
Detectives searched the computer and found SpyRecon software on it, according to the affidavit.
Kristy Macleod could not be reached for comment. Company officials for SpyRecon did not respond to an interview request.
In an online advertisement, the company asks, "Have you ever needed to secretly read the e-mail of your child or spouse?"
In the second case Austin police filed, investigators said Alexis Lugo, 29, installed eBlaster software on his ex-girlfriend's computer.
An affidavit in that case said Kara Winebright called Austin police and reported that she thought Lugo had hacked into her computer and changed the password on some of her accounts.
Winebright said she had broken up with Lugo and later had discovered some unusual activity on her account with eHarmony, a dating Web site. She checked her other online accounts and found similar problems.
Police searched her computer and found the eBlaster software.
Ordinary anti-spy software might not detect such programs, but checking to see which programs and files have been downloaded to hard drives should reveal them, said Fowler, the manufacturer of eBlaster.
Fowler said his company intended for the software to be used only by parents or businesses, not by spying spouses or partners. The company marketed the product that way several years ago but stopped, he said.
"We ultimately decided that it wasn't a market we wanted to participate in," Fowler said. "There are certainly those who buy the software for this kind of thing. But we don't encourage it."
tplohetski@statesman.com; 445-3605
OK, it’s illegal to spy on your wifes email....yet legal for the Government to spy on anyones email.
HMMMMmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.
How do you feel about stalkers? Not much difference, in my book.
The prosecutor is nothing but another Nifong. So basically any parent now monitoring their children on the internet will now go to jail for multiple years.
eBlaster 5.0 now has optional Remote Install if you do not have physical access to the computer you wish to monitor.
eBlaster Internet spy software is the ONLY software in the world that will capture their incoming and outgoing email and then IMMEDIATELY forward that email to you.
Example:
You are at work and your child is home from school. She receives an email from John at 3:00 PM. Within seconds, you receive a COPY of that email sent to your email address. A few minutes later, she replies to John’s email. Within seconds, you receive a COPY of what she sent to John.
The article wasn’t clear as to where the computer was and who is paying for the internet connection. If the husband has access to it and is paying for the connection in any way then I don’t see how he was found guilty of anything. Now if he snuck into the wife’s house (I’m assuming they lived appart at the time of the incident, but who knows) and put the program on and then networked it back to his home computer then I can see where there’s a problem. Still, if he had that much access to her computer then she must have ok’ed it.
You have just assessed why I’m not sure how I feel about this.
Hmm, that's verrry interesting indeed. Remote, you say. Yep, he's guilty.
- Keystrokes Typed
If any keystroke is typed, it could be a password for an email account, something written in a word document, ANYTHING that is typed, eBlaster will capture it.
http://www.eblaster.com/eBlaster.html
(this page lists everything it does.....wow!)
Businesses can do the same with employee’s e-mails because THEY own the computer & network. If a spouse owns a computer, why can he/she do the same???
The way I understand it - businesses have their employees sign an agreement that they give the company the right to do that.
These husbands/boyfriends did not get that permission. Do these same guys have the right to open regular mail of their girlfriends or spouses? I'd say NO! They might own the computer - but they don't own the person!!
I used a similar spy ware to catch my now ex-wife in an extra-marital affair back in 2000. Even though it was an exrcuciating time for me, I admit it was quite interesting and comical at times to read texts of her trying to figure out how I knew what I had found out.
I figured out long ago that law is really witten to protect the “screwer” (bad guys, liars, cheats and politicians)and not the “screwee” (those taken advantage of by those listed above. There is no justice in modern America.
I’m not either, but I think four years is excessive.
I’d have loved to have had the benefit of this and a PC for a few gf’s I’ve had since my exwife......would have saved me a bunch of pain/grief/money.
I’ve known about keystroke jokers for a long time now, and always copy/paste credit card numbers into the field rather than type them
bump
The key phrase in this story is "estranged wife". Evidently they are seperated which means he has no legal access to her computer, etc. If they were together and living in the same house would this be illegal since husbands and wifes, in most states, each own half of everything? In reality he would be tapping his own computer if that was the case.
Wait, I thought our friends in government just told us emails weren’t private.
I confronted her and she was pissed that I had violated her privacy. "You had no right!"
I understand her anger, but I explained to her, "If the US government can override the 4th amendment with a warrant, then I retain that power as a parent." and I'm glad that I did.
Sorry.....my husband and I are a team.....I open his mail.....he can open mine......if there’s anything secret going on.....there’s problems.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.