Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/13/2007 9:09:42 AM PST by Ol' Sparky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Ol' Sparky

They have zero percent chance of winning my vote unless they change about 100% of their political positions. I have no adverse feelings about the letter “D” or the title “Democrat.” It’s everything they stand for I reject. If they change their positions then sure I’ll vote for them. Since there is zero percent chance they will change there is zero percent change I will vote for them.


2 posted on 11/13/2007 9:14:45 AM PST by The Ghost of FReepers Past (Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light..... Isaiah 5:20)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ol' Sparky
Democrats court religious voters,...

"Some of my best friends are religious!"

3 posted on 11/13/2007 9:17:40 AM PST by American Quilter (The urge to save humanity is nearly always a cover for the urge to rule. - H. L. Mencken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ol' Sparky

convincing economic and political conservatives within the GOP they can kick religious conservatives to the curb.

These scenarios are among those envisioned by scholars on religion and politics in advance of the 2008 election, which they say is turning out to be a referendum on both the religious right and left.

A this would not happen B)- most aren’t merely moral conservative or fiscal conservative they are Reaganites), B) Shut up this liberal author (and his dreams), c) they won’t win if we split the reagan coalition. d) Guiliani isn’t even truely a so called “fiscal conservative”. No real conservative support for him (only RINOS, liberals..)!


4 posted on 11/13/2007 9:26:39 AM PST by JSDude1 (When a liberal represents the Presidential Nominee for the Republicans; THEY'RE TOAST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ol' Sparky
The Dems have always had liberal, mainline Christians. They’re not going to get any significant part of the evangelical vote. Rudy might depress evangelical turnout for the pubbies, but it won’t go to Hillary.
8 posted on 11/13/2007 9:34:30 AM PST by colorado tanker (I'm unmoderated - just ask Bill O'Reilly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ol' Sparky

Democrat’s “courting” of religious voters will met with the same response that cat-calls and wolf whistles from a construction crew get.


9 posted on 11/13/2007 10:39:23 AM PST by EricT. (The tree of liberty needs to be watered...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ol' Sparky
“Democrats court religious voters, but will they desert GOP?”

The term “religious” is thrown around pretty regular today. A lot of people who say they believe in God do not read their bibles, pray, or fellowship with other believers on a regular basis to share their “faith”.

Those people will certainly be moved by the democrats, especially if they see no real difference between the democrats and the GOP on social issues.

Anyone that doubts me needs to explain why Ted Kennedy is a US Senator. Yes, he gets votes from “religious” people.

11 posted on 11/13/2007 10:51:22 AM PST by Preachin' (Enoch's testimony was that he pleased God: Why are we still here?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ol' Sparky
"Not that the Democrats will have an easy time picking up religious votes from the GOP."

Just as CarVILE figured out awhile ago, the Democrats can get Reagan Democrats and former Reagan Democrats turned Republican to return to the fold and vote their pocketbook instead of their values if the the social issues are negated in a race, or the Democrat runs to the right of a Republican on them.

Rudy v. Hillary = PA and WV both vote solidly blue and no need to waste $ contesting them. Probably plenty of other places like VA too, from what I've read.

12 posted on 11/13/2007 11:04:54 AM PST by penowa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ol' Sparky

I’d say that religious conservatives will be just about as taken in by this sham as NRA members were when Kerry borrowed a shotgun and pretended to be a hunter. Which is to say, not at all.


13 posted on 11/13/2007 11:11:25 AM PST by Kenton (All vices in moderation. I don't want to overdo any but I don't want to skip any either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ol' Sparky
Pure wishful thinking by the msm. They don't understand that conservatives of all stripes can have a debate over principles.

Guiliani is bending over backwards in my view to placate Christians. He is in no way, manner, or form "kicking" Christians to the curb.

Anyone who seriously believes the dims have a shot at the Christian right are out and out stupid.

18 posted on 11/13/2007 1:40:49 PM PST by Pietro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ol' Sparky

Most religious people understand that promoting socialism does not in any way satisfy the requirement to personally help the poor.

Those who think it does already vote democrat.


21 posted on 11/14/2007 7:48:59 AM PST by MrB (You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson