To: EternalVigilance
Are you saying that was not good law? Are you saying the trauma of the rape should continue for the unwilling woman who was raped?
58 posted on
11/18/2007 9:38:45 AM PST by
Pistolshot
(Never argue with stupid people, they just bring you down to their level and beat you with experience)
To: Pistolshot
Are you saying that was not good law? Are you saying the trauma of the rape should continue for the unwilling woman who was raped? Either every person has an unalienable right to life, or no one does.
And, civilized men, for thousands of years, have known that it is unjust and unlawful to kill a person for the wrong-doing of another person.
60 posted on
11/18/2007 9:40:35 AM PST by
EternalVigilance
(Our God-given rights, and those of our posterity, are not open to debate, negotiation or compromise!)
To: Pistolshot
“Are you saying the trauma of the rape should continue for the unwilling woman who was raped?”
Killing a child who is the very rare result of a rape traumatizes the woman a second time.
This, time, though, you make her a party to the crime.
125 posted on
11/18/2007 11:57:54 AM PST by
fetal heart beats by 21st day
(Defending human life is not a federalist issue. It is the business of all of humanity.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson