Immigration Is the Question

WSJ ^ | November 19 2007 | June Kronholz

[Tennessee Nana]

“They aren’t immigrants, they are illegal migrant workers. Invaders for short.”

No they are illegal aliens...what they do and how they got here has nothing to do with immigration

ILLEGAL ALIENS AND THEIR APOLOGISTS ARE ANTI-IMMIGRATION

[yorkie]

>> “Hopefully, the incompetent republicans will shed Bush’s policies and move ahead defending both our borders and constitution.” <<

Our border (especially during a time of war), and our Constitution are the two things our POTUS should be protecting above everyting else! Those two things should be NUMBER ONE on his agenda.

Instead, it is ‘numero uno’ for a later date.

[stephenjohnbanker]

“ILLEGAL ALIENS AND THEIR APOLOGISTS ARE ANTI-IMMIGRATION”

BUMP!

[Kevmo]

If immigration is the question, here’s my standard answer: We can do something about Illegal immigration.

RICO —Citizen Recourse
Private persons and entities may initiate civil suits to obtain injunctions and treble damages against enterprises that conspire to or actually violate federal alien smuggling, harboring, or document fraud statutes, under the Racketeer-Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO). The pattern of racketeering activity is defined as commission of two or more of the listed crimes. A RICO enterprise can be any individual legal entity, or a group of individuals who are not a legal entity but are associated in fact, and can include nonprofit associations.

Here’s what I’ve been pushing: it’s time to file Racketeering, Influencing, and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) lawsuits. RICO lawyers could turn it around in a few years and MAKE MONEY at the same time. I’m surprised they haven’t done it already.

In the absence of enforcement, we can get the word out in the meantime that there is money to be made in filing RICO lawsuits against employers who hire illegal aliens.

Employers would have no trouble shutting down the border if they could get sued by someone under the RICO statutes for hiring these people in the first place. The next time an illegal alien kills someone in a drunk driving accident or somesuch thing, I’m going to point out that the victim’s family might be able to seek compensation from the employer under these statutes in the hopes that it would catch on. If this did catch on, would see such a swift backlash against illegal immigration that no employer would go near these people and they’ll all simply want to go back home.

IRS Reporting

REWARD FOR REPORTING EMPLOYERS OF ILLEGAL ALIENS

CALL THE IRS HOTLINE 1-800-829-0433 YOU MAY BE ENTITLED TO A REWARD

Call the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) hotline 1-800-829-0433 to report all
suspected employers of illegal aliens-—you are not required to identify
yourself and may be entitled to a reward. The Application for Reward ( Form 211 http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/f211.pdf)
can be downloaded from http://www.irs. gov or call 1-800-829-3676. The IRS does
not take kindly to employers that seek to evade taxes by paying cash for day
labor-this is a common practice at construction sites. Report the employer`s
license plate number and any other information you may have. Employers usually
can’t run and take the hit in their wallets. Follow up with the IRS and ask
what action is being taken; if they refuse to cooperate, notify the press and
your elected officials. Do your part-—spread the word-—help make this
nationwide campaign a success!!!

Hunter is the best candidate on Immigration.

.

.

.
Why the smart money is on Duncan Hunter
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1926032/posts
Posted on 11/15/2007 3:43:17 AM PST by Kevmo

Hunter’s criticism of Thompson over this issue is well aimed. We need someone in the white house who isn’t a johnny-come-lately on this issue.
Road to Des Moines Conversions on Immigration (Hunter Press release)
News Which Cannot Lose ^ | 10/25/07 | Duncan Hunter/staff
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/1916889/posts

[yorkie]

Kevmo - keep it going! You are SO right on!

[BuffaloJack]

I thought that’s what I said.

[Travis McGee]

[wtc911]

In one of the most liberal states in the union she and her boy Elliot were forced very publicly to stand down.

________________________________________

NY is definetly not 'one of the most liberal states'. NYS has to deal with the 8,000,000 people in NYC (many of whom move here from bible-belt states - raised in your backyard).

Seperate the state from the city and the picture is different. Even LI is ruled by NYC. In 2004 Nassau County was 49% for Bush and Suffolk was so close that it was a statistical tie.