Insert picture of Edvard Munch's "The Scream" here.
1 posted on
11/20/2007 8:24:29 AM PST by
3AngelaD
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
To: 3AngelaD
There will never not be a need for professional people to take complicated information, put it into a form that viewers and readers will need to know and want to understand, he said. Geez! When are they going to start doing that?
3 posted on
11/20/2007 8:26:17 AM PST by
Rummyfan
(Iraq: it's not about Iraq anymore, it's about the USA!)
To: 3AngelaD
The ComPost's credibility has been dead for decades.
4 posted on
11/20/2007 8:26:58 AM PST by
Zakeet
(Be thankful we don't get all the government we pay for)
To: 3AngelaD
There will never not be a need for professional people to take complicated information, put it into a form that viewers and readers will need to know and want to understand, he said.
Patronizing SOB.
5 posted on
11/20/2007 8:27:01 AM PST by
ConorMacNessa
(HM/2 USN, 3rd Bn. 5th Marines, RVN 1969. St. Michael the Archangel defend us in battle!)
To: 3AngelaD
Ten years! That is depressing. I have ten months in the office pool.
To: 3AngelaD
Washington Post Print Paper 'Probably' Dead in 10 Years Party at my house when it happens!
7 posted on
11/20/2007 8:31:56 AM PST by
freespirited
(I'm voting for the GOP nominee.)
To: 3AngelaD
...they look at you, and its like Man, what planet were you born on? Brokaw quipped. That's how I always watch TV.
8 posted on
11/20/2007 8:34:02 AM PST by
Berlin_Freeper
(ETERNAL SHAME on the Treasonous and Immoral Democrats!)
To: 3AngelaD
“However, Brokaw said there will still be a demand for journalists to interpret information.”
Interpret: = make up, spin, withhold, fabricate, counterfeit, extort.
To: 3AngelaD
Tom, will that be before or after the Goracle says the world ends?
11 posted on
11/20/2007 8:41:34 AM PST by
exit82
(I believe Juanita--Hillary enabled Juanita's rapist.)
To: 3AngelaD
People said that with the advent of the PC, paperwork would be reduced a lot too. Now it’s so easy to print, that everything has to be printed and copied 100 times.
12 posted on
11/20/2007 8:47:13 AM PST by
stuartcr
(Everything happens as God wants it to.....otherwise, things would be different.)
To: 3AngelaD
All I want ..and will pay for..is who, what, why, where, when and how. Brokaw’s opinion..nada...
13 posted on
11/20/2007 8:47:59 AM PST by
mo
To: 3AngelaD
there will still be a demand for journalists to interpret information.
No there won’t and no there isn’t
To: 3AngelaD
can I get a digital countdown counter to that day to put on my FR profile page???
15 posted on
11/20/2007 8:51:21 AM PST by
weegee
(End the Bush-Bush-Bush-Clinton/Clinton-Clinton/Clinton-Bush-Bush-Clinton/Clinton Oligarchy 1980-2012)
To: 3AngelaD
Brokaw said there will still be a demand for journalists to interpret information.Journalists "interpret information"? Why don't they just give us the information and let us "interpret" it? Maybe that's the reason newspapers are dying, Brokaw.
21 posted on
11/20/2007 9:01:57 AM PST by
hsalaw
To: All
Dear WP
SO DAMN LONG????????
Can I do anything more to speed up the demise of your lefty rag.... other than just throwing your mail with subscription offers straigh in the trash?
Have a nice day :)
22 posted on
11/20/2007 9:02:02 AM PST by
ElPatriota
(Duncan Hunter 08 & Let's not forget, we are all still friends, basically :) despite our differences)
To: 3AngelaD
There will never not be a need for professional people to take complicated information, put it into a form that viewers and readers will need to know and want to understand, he said. There will never not be the desire, on the part of viewers and readers, to choose for themselves which professional people they want to take complicated information and put it into a form that viewers and readers want to know.
24 posted on
11/20/2007 9:16:01 AM PST by
Steely Tom
(Steely's First Law of the Main Stream Media: if it doesn't advance the agenda, it's not news.)
To: 3AngelaD
There will never not be a need for professional people to take complicated information, put it into a form that viewers and readers will need to know and want to understand, he said. How about the need for a journalist who can present an idea without using a double negative?
26 posted on
11/20/2007 9:18:30 AM PST by
50sDad
(Liberals: Never Happy, Never Grateful, Never Right.)
To: 3AngelaD
Strange how they ignore the transfer of the add delivery to the USPS. This was caused by the inability of the papers to provide coverage. When the car dealers complete the transition to the Internet and the home sales people stop they will no longer be able to support the staff.
28 posted on
11/20/2007 9:41:42 AM PST by
Domangart
(editor and publisher)
To: 3AngelaD; abb; Milhous; george76; BOBTHENAILER; SierraWasp; Liz; martin_fierro
“When Tom Brokaw, an old-time mainstream media figure in his own right, says he thinks print newspapers wont be around in 10 years, thats probably not a good sign for the industry.”
Tom, you are probably correct.
Of course PRAVDABCNNBCBS will slide into the Liberal Cesspool before 10 years.
31 posted on
11/20/2007 9:44:23 AM PST by
Grampa Dave
(("Ron Paul and his flaming antiwar spam monkeys can Kiss my Ass!!"- Jim Robinson, Sept, 30, 2007))
To: 3AngelaD
With the bias liberal left slant the Post displays, the death knell watch has started. When the NY Slimes completely disintegrates, the Post will follow.
33 posted on
11/20/2007 10:18:54 AM PST by
lilylangtree
(Veni, Vidi, Vici)
To: 3AngelaD
Did Tom mention how long he thought that television news would be around?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson