Holy thread hijack, Batman! This article says nothing about the legal status of that immigrant.
True enough, but at least this is three extra hits on a languishing article that should be read.
Hope it helps the sidebar status.
It would also have been relevant to wonder if he is as concerned about nearly universally broken & ignored traffic laws giving a contempt for laws in general, or is only worried about his own narrow area, and how it relates to his pocketbook.
(& just going by the odds, legal status is most likely zilch...but saying it, or even implying it, without reference to the article's main thrust would really be a Hi, Jack!)
I also wonder if he would or wouldn't be upset by the 'unathorized' use of the passage quoted in my original post.