Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is Atomic Radiation as Dangerous as We Thought?
Der Spiegel ^ | November 22, 2007 | Matthias Schulz

Posted on 11/25/2007 1:01:54 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum

A mounting number of studies are coming to some surprising conclusions about the dangers of nuclear radiation. It might not be as deadly as is widely believed.

(Excerpt) Read more at spiegel.de ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: radiation
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last
Is Atomic Radiation as Dangerous as We Thought?
1 posted on 11/25/2007 1:01:56 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

-—more on the subject—

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1930119/posts


2 posted on 11/25/2007 1:08:34 PM PST by rellimpank (--don't believe anything the MSM tells you about firearms or explosives--NRA Benefactor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Related thread.
3 posted on 11/25/2007 1:08:37 PM PST by Steely Tom (Steely's First Law of the Main Stream Media: if it doesn't advance the agenda, it's not news.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom
Missed it by... that... much!
4 posted on 11/25/2007 1:09:22 PM PST by Steely Tom (Steely's First Law of the Main Stream Media: if it doesn't advance the agenda, it's not news.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

You mean “The Hills Have Eyes” wasn’t based on fact?


5 posted on 11/25/2007 1:10:29 PM PST by rbg81 (DRAIN THE SWAMP!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

That was interesting.

Thanks for posting it.


6 posted on 11/25/2007 1:13:43 PM PST by PeteB570 (Guns, what real men want for Christmas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Yes radiation scare is blown out of proportion. Unfortunately this moves nukes closer to the “conventional weapons” category. eeks.


7 posted on 11/25/2007 1:14:57 PM PST by Hunterite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
It's OK to eat the fish.
8 posted on 11/25/2007 1:16:59 PM PST by WildWeasel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

As in the previous radiation threads, the main danger is lawsuits when terrorists detonate a dirty bomb.


9 posted on 11/25/2007 1:17:39 PM PST by RightWhale (anti-razors are pro-life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

—I have seen it asserted in print that vets of US nuke subs live longer than average—anybody out there know anything about that??


10 posted on 11/25/2007 1:18:03 PM PST by rellimpank (--don't believe anything the MSM tells you about firearms or explosives--NRA Benefactor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rellimpank
—I have seen it asserted in print that vets of US nuke subs live longer than average—anybody out there know anything about that?

I bet the selection process for submariners gets rid of lots of people with bad habits that decrease life expectancy.

11 posted on 11/25/2007 1:21:26 PM PST by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: WildWeasel
I grew up eating off Fiesta-ware glazed with Uranium Pigment. I even got some of the plates on display in the breakfast nook. I seem OK. Maybe not to other Freepers.
12 posted on 11/25/2007 1:24:56 PM PST by oyez (Justa' another high minded lowlife.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
As in the previous radiation threads, the main danger is lawsuits when terrorists detonate a dirty bomb. Period.
13 posted on 11/25/2007 1:27:08 PM PST by yankeedame ("Oh, I can take it but I'd much rather dish it out.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: rellimpank
A US nuke boat sailor gets more radiation from shore duty than sea duty on a nuke submarine. By the way, a nuke boat is not a bomb.
14 posted on 11/25/2007 1:28:10 PM PST by encm(ss) (USN Ret.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Dr. Bernie Cohen, a health physicist at the University of Pittsburg offered to eat an amount of Plutonium equal in mass to an amount of caffeine ingested by Ralph Nader. He was calling B.S. on Nader’s claims about the toxicity of Plutonium.
15 posted on 11/25/2007 1:36:11 PM PST by Lonesome in Massachussets (NYT Headline: Protocols of the Learned Elders of CBS: Fake but Accurate, Experts Say)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Most of my wife's family worked on the NV Test Site back in the days of above-ground shots. They tell stories of having to stay inside the school house for a couple of hours until a nuke cloud had passed. My father-in-law developed a curious chest tumor after scraping himself on a piece of heavy machinery while bulldozing dead irradiated animals off a blast site. He had the tumor removed and is still kicking into his seventies.

That being said, there are a lot of folks from that area that didn't make it into their sixties, but that may be attributed to other causes. Desert living can be hard on the body.

16 posted on 11/25/2007 1:42:24 PM PST by randog (What the...?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oyez
I seem OK. Maybe not to other Freepers.

Well, don't listen to them. I think your tentacles are very handsome.

17 posted on 11/25/2007 1:43:03 PM PST by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Good article. The danger of low dose radiation (under 150 REM) is certainly exaggerated in the media (and of course, exposure levels themselves are themselves systematically exaggerated).

In the face of any data contrary to the anti-nuclear fictions weaved by the media, anti-nuclear activists, neo-luddites, we must contend with the inevitable straw-man argument - “radiation isn’t dangerous” - being refuted by observations of acute radiation poisoning occuring after exposure to between 1000 and 10,000 REM, followed by anecdotal stories of old hags trying to swindle millions out of entities having nothing to do with their hereditary diseases.


18 posted on 11/25/2007 1:46:24 PM PST by M203M4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Talk to the victims of Chernobyl if they’re any left.


19 posted on 11/25/2007 1:56:54 PM PST by lilylangtree (Veni, Vidi, Vici)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
And the scaremongers prevent us from having the option of buying radiated food off store shelves. Yep, they know what is in our best interests. NOT!

Hard to believe that they physically carry the spent fuel cells. Maybe those black jackets are one foot of lead thickness. I don't even want that job.

20 posted on 11/25/2007 2:11:29 PM PST by taxesareforever (Never forget Matt Maupin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson