[DustyMoment]

Why did George Bush I throw in the towel in 1992, instead of taking down Bill? George I after all, had been head of the CIA. It's not really credible that I know more about Bill'd mis- and malfeasance than he, now is it?

Bush I let himself be setup by the Dem Congress who manipulated him into agreeing to a tax increase after he famously told the nation "Read my lips, no new taxes!" (In retrospect, I believe that his Texas accent was misunderstood and what he actually said was "no new taxis". LOL!).

With respect to his CIA thing, I believe that there are a couple of reasons he may not have gone 'mano a mano' with Clinton. One, the information may have been classified and he may not have been able to reveal it. Two, I believe that Bush I, much like his sons Jorge and Jeb, is an inherently nice guy who was unwilling to climb into that particular gutter.

Your question #1 is an excellent point that has NEVER (to the best of my recollection), ever been explored or explained. Until/unless we ever get access to the KGB records (I'm not holding my breath on that!), I don't believe that we will ever have this question answered.

[america4vr]

Have you forgotten the greatest propaganda fraud in the history of American presidential electioneering perpetuated by the Arkansas mafia and zealously drummed into the American psyche by the more than obsequious Clinton sycophantic panderers, the MSM, time and time and time again that it was the worst economy in fifty years????

[Kenny Bunk]

.....couple of reasons he may not have gone 'mano a mano' with Clinton....

There are a million reasons, pal. And not one of them is worth a damn. George I tanked that campaign of '92. Sometimes in the dark of night I think it may be because of what Bill had on him!?