Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/28/2007 5:16:45 AM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last
To: Kaslin

I, for one, applaud these individuals attempts to remove their genetic material from the “pool”.

Bravo.
Wish more DemocRATS would try this.


2 posted on 11/28/2007 5:18:46 AM PST by SJSAMPLE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

bump


3 posted on 11/28/2007 5:19:40 AM PST by lowbridge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Actually, its the remaining childless that is selfish.


4 posted on 11/28/2007 5:21:00 AM PST by G Larry (HILLARY CARE = DYING IN LINE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Just a perfect example of throwing some chlorine into the gene pool. I for one am eternally glad morons like this will not create other humans to pollute with their insanity.


5 posted on 11/28/2007 5:23:17 AM PST by SabianKinslow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
Those who rail against the existence of Too Many People usually turn out to mean Too Many Other People.
6 posted on 11/28/2007 5:24:40 AM PST by ExGeeEye (I've been waiting since 11/04/79 to do something about Iran.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

If Toni was really serious she would consider a retroactive abortion for herself and her husband.


7 posted on 11/28/2007 5:26:54 AM PST by baldeagle390
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

I agree with removal of her genotype but abhor the method - pray for an end to abortion.


8 posted on 11/28/2007 5:27:15 AM PST by ConorMacNessa (HM/2 USN, 3rd Bn. 5th Marines, RVN 1969. St. Michael the Archangel defend us in battle!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

if she was really into saving the planet she would kill herself


9 posted on 11/28/2007 5:28:09 AM PST by South Dakota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Here’s my Humble Opinion about these losers:

WHO CARES?

They are doing all of us a favor by not breeding.

Thankfully ...


10 posted on 11/28/2007 5:29:36 AM PST by Mr. C
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
Vernelli aborted a pregnancy and, by age 27, had herself sterilized. Baby-making, she says, is "selfish" and "all about maintaining your genetic line at the expense of the planet."

Well there are two good things to say about this. 1) By sterilizing herself at least this woman won't be aborting any more babies, and 2) Sterilization guarantees that just a few more stupid-genes don't make it into the general gene pool population. Now if she could just stop breathing, she'd produce far less CO2 - eventually she'll realize that and hopefully do the right thing. ;-)

11 posted on 11/28/2007 5:30:22 AM PST by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
A sad tale too for those of us, like my wife and myself, who would have loved to have had kids, but through no fault of our own could not.

Selfish libtards.

13 posted on 11/28/2007 5:34:42 AM PST by metesky ("Brethren, leave us go amongst them." Rev. Capt. Samuel Johnston Clayton - Ward Bond- The Searchers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

I’ll be glad when the carbon fad ends and we can start worrying about some other indicator element. Personally, my goal is to be entropy-neutral by 2010.


15 posted on 11/28/2007 5:37:16 AM PST by Caesar Soze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Find a good excuse to be selfish and lazy and stick with it.


16 posted on 11/28/2007 5:39:07 AM PST by sierrahome
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Yet another quip to the age old question. If you spit in the ocean does it raise the level? Well Freepers, does it?


18 posted on 11/28/2007 5:41:12 AM PST by ontap (Just another backstabbing conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

This sort of thing is being addressed in this country:

President Bush Inks New Measure

WASHINGTON, DC-On Tuesday, Congress approved the Americans With No Abilities Act – sweeping new legislation that provides benefits and protection for more than one hundred thirty-five million talentless Americans.

The act, signed into law by President Bush shortly after its passage, is being hailed as a major victory for the millions upon millions of U.S. citizens who lack any real skills.

“Roughly fifty percent of all Americans – through no fault of their own – do not possess the talent necessary to carve out a meaningful role for themselves in society,” said Bush, a longtime AWNA supporter.

“Their lives are futile, hamster-wheel existences of unrewarding, dead-end busy work: Xeroxing documents written by others, processing mail-in rebates for Black and Decker toaster ovens, and filling in bureaucratic forms that nobody will ever see. Sadly, for these millions of non-abled Americans, the American dream of working hard and moving up is simply not a practical possibility.”

Under the Americans With No Abilities Act, more than twenty-five million important-sounding “middle man” positions in the white-collar sector will be created for non-abled persons, providing them with a sense of purpose and ability. Mandatory, non-performance-based raises and promotions will also be offered to create a sense of upward mobility for even the most unremarkable, utterly replaceable employees.

The legislation also provides corporations with incentives to hire non-abled workers, including tax breaks for those who hire one useless worker for every two talented hirees.

Finally, the Americans With No Abilities Act also contains tough new measures to prevent discrimination against the non-abled by banning prospective employers from asking such job-interview questions as, “What can you bring to this organization?” and “Do you have any special skills that would make you an asset to this company?”

“As a non-abled person, I frequently find myself unable to keep up with co-workers who have something going for them,” said Mary Lou Gertz, who lost her position as a nonessential filing clerk at a Minneapolis tile wholesaler last month because of her lack of notable skills. “This new law should really help people like me.”

With the passage of the Americans With No Abilities Act, Gertz and millions of other untalented, nonessential citizens can finally see a light at the end of the tunnel.

Said Bush, “It is our duty, both as lawmakers and as human beings, to provide each and every American citizen, regardless of his or her lack of value to society, some sort of remunerative position to take up in this great nation.”


20 posted on 11/28/2007 5:44:26 AM PST by Jack Hammer (here)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Beowulf; Defendingliberty

~~Anthropogenic Global Warming ™~~


22 posted on 11/28/2007 5:53:27 AM PST by steelyourfaith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
The couples who choose abortion and sterilization may not save the planet, but they're saving the gene pool a mess o' trouble by purging their own from the mix. The Darwin Awards folks, who honor those who improve the species by accidentally removing themselves from it, will have to create a new category:

Shhhhhh! Don't tell them. Maybe in another generation, all the stupid people will be gone and we will have the planet all to ourselves.
24 posted on 11/28/2007 5:58:41 AM PST by spotbust1 (Procrastinators of the world unite . . . . .tomorrow!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
Baby-making, she says, is "selfish" and "all about maintaining your genetic line at the expense of the planet."

I wonder what her thoughts are regarding sex w/o the possibility of creating new life. Seems kind of selfish to me.

26 posted on 11/28/2007 6:08:48 AM PST by al_c (Avoid the consequences of erudite vernacular utilized irrespective of necessity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
So seriously, in fact, that Vernelli aborted a pregnancy and, by age 27, had herself sterilized. Baby-making, she says, is "selfish" and "all about maintaining your genetic line at the expense of the planet."

LOL!!!! YOU! OUT OF THE GENE POOL!!!!! Personally, I think this woman makes a good point though. If we're being selfish and maintaining our genetic line at the expense of the planet, then perhaps it is time we started exploring other options, like Mars. :)
33 posted on 11/28/2007 6:49:40 AM PST by Rick.Donaldson (http://www.transasianaxis.com - Visit for lastest on DPRK/Russia/China/Etc --Fred Thompson for Prez.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

So seriously, in fact, that Vernelli aborted a pregnancy and, by age 27, had herself sterilized. Baby-making, she says, is “selfish” and “all about maintaining your genetic line at the expense of the planet.”

__________________________________________________

Wouldn’t they leave less of a footprint if they just killed themselves? These people are idiots.


35 posted on 11/28/2007 6:54:16 AM PST by ThisLittleLightofMine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson