Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Much as I hate to say it, I {gulp} agree with the ACLU on this one.
1 posted on 11/28/2007 10:14:47 AM PST by RedsHunter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: RedsHunter

Here in St. Louis the National Park Service does not allow video taping on the grounds of the St. Louis Arch without first getting permission. Obviously they don’t enforce it unless they need an excuse to boot somebody.

This does seem to be patently unconstitutional.


2 posted on 11/28/2007 10:48:21 AM PST by live+let_live
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RedsHunter

Is that ice I see in Hades? The ACLU defending a non-Lib must have their founders spinning in the underworld.

Can we next expect to see them defend the other 9 parts of the Bill of Rights? (Holding breath & turning purple)


3 posted on 11/28/2007 10:55:18 AM PST by NTHockey (Rules of engagement #1 - Take no prisoners))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Springman; sergeantdave; cyclotic; netmilsmom; RatsDawg; PGalt; FreedomHammer; queenkathy; ...
Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

If you would like to be added or dropped from the Michigan ping list, please freepmail me.

Part 2 of the ongoing Lennox/Peters saga. Interesting stuff. I hate it when I agree with the ACLU about anything, but, well, there ya go.

4 posted on 11/28/2007 11:01:59 AM PST by grellis (Is this the best we've got??!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

According to the ACLU, this is not their concern. Their concern is the ban on videotaping only.
Yeah, and I believe 'em. /sarc
5 posted on 11/28/2007 11:10:49 AM PST by SunkenCiv (Profile updated Tuesday, November 27, 2007___________________https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RedsHunter

“Much as I hate to say it, I {gulp} agree with the ACLU on this one.”

No, they are wrong.

It is not about suppression of “free speech” or suppression of political advocacy - no one is preventing Lenox from doing his political advocacy - but, a college campus, your shopping mall, an office or office building is not treated the same as the public square, they are given the status of private property and as such those who own/control that property are given leeway, in first amendment considerations, to reasonable rules regarding activities that take place on the property and mostly that the rules are applied equally. Unless someone demonstrates that the rules being applied to Lenox have not been required of others or are not being applied in equal fashion, I doubt the ACLU position will be upheld. Maybe, they are just looking for some GOP support.


6 posted on 11/28/2007 12:41:47 PM PST by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RedsHunter

>>Much as I hate to say it, I {gulp} agree with the ACLU on this one.<<

The ACLU is right a lot and does good. But they are infested with an obsession of censoring public expression of Christianity.


7 posted on 11/28/2007 12:43:40 PM PST by gondramB (Preach the Gospel at all times, and when necessary, use words.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson