[unspun]

I think Huckabee is in the cross-hairs of those in the "libertarian" mentality, within FR. I am not. I'm in the "classic liberal" and freedom-with-responsibility vein -- more like Madison and Lincoln than that Karl-Marx-reactionary lesbian from Russia, Rand -- so I don't slam the door on likely the most appealing, vote-getting candidate, Huckabee. I should have said Madison, Lincoln, and T. Roosevelt. I would be for Duncan Hunter, if he came across like a presidental candidate and could instruct and sell the public on the issues. He doesn't do that. And Tancredo comes across like a prankster.

I don't see another very TR-like candidate out there, except in bits and pieces.

I do see Huckabee and Romney, who can appeal and lead. Which of those two do you want?

[hunter112]

I do see Huckabee and Romney, who can appeal and lead. Which of those two do you want?

If it gets down to those two, and only those two (Rooty doesn't even count in my mind) then it will be Romney, but I will pull the lever with crossed fingers, hoping he's telling the truth this time...

[HuntsvilleTxVeteran]

I do not follow fake polls and I do not follow fake Conservatives.

The MSM and the socialist arm of the republican party want
Rudy, Romney, McCain or Huckabee so a Globalist Socialist
will be POTUS.

[BlueNgold]

Romney will lead this country further towards socialism.
I don’t trust Huckabee and have serious doubst about his ability to handle serious security issues.

I want neither. The first vote has not yet been cast, and this is far from a two horse race.