[dfwgator]

I’m not a big Weiner fan, but I hope he sues the pants off of them.

[domenad]

He always had a brass pair. Now let’s see how serious he is about collecting damages, or if this is just a tit-for-tat.

[vbmoneyspender]

I hope he is able to hit them with a SLAPP (i.e. Strategic lawsuit against public participation) claim. In California, you can turn around and sue someone who is suing you in order to chill your 1st amendment rights.

SLAPP

[DManA]

Copyright infringement. Interesting tactic.

[FrdmLvr]

You go, Michael. I’m a fan.

[fishtank]

Savage rocks.

God bless you, Michael Savage.

[mewzilla]

Cool. Discovery should be a hoot....

[MrB]

CAIR = NAACB

(national association for the advancement of car bombers)

[Salvey]

Is this a copy of the actual Complaint? I hope not, as the caption shows the defendant as the “Counsel...” and not “Council...” Also, how about adding a claim for tortious interference with an economic advantage?

[Aria]

Boy, did they ever pick on the WRONG GUY! YEE HAAWWWW

[yoe]

You go Michael!

Savage lacks the crumbling feet of many Americans; he is anything but Politically Correct...he is honest. CAIR practices a form of sedition and should be barred from the country.

[Southside_Chicago_Republican]

I’m looking forward to some serious @sskicking here. Maybe he’ll also send a message to other groups who complain about “hate” and “bigotry” and hurt feelings as excuses to stifle freedom.

[ml/nj]

I only listen to Savage maybe 10 hours a year as compared with about 300 hours a year that I listen to Rush. But Savage is right to ask why it is that Rush has nothing to say about the CAIR sponsored boycott of Savage's show. In fact Rush has downright little to say about the Islamic threat to Western Civilization. I guess cats are more important and/or safer for him these days.

ML/NJ

[donna]

CAIR has plenty of money to set this right and Savage deserves every penny.

[South40]

...CAIR is not a civil rights organization and never has been.

And never will be.

[taildragger]

Isn't someone else suing CAIR as well?

That is one way to stop them, drain their resources via legal entanglements....

Maybe we ought to try that to the ACLU...

[South40]

[bluefish]

Savage has suggested that they will try to expose the financial backers for CAIR.

Based on show comments yesterday, when CAIR attacked a website (anti-cair.com or something like theat), they backed off as soon as the defendent (whitehead?) tried to get CAIR to list the financial backers.

The suit names "Doe 1-100 as co-defendants." These are CAIR's financial backers. This is the angle that makes the suit very interesting.

Savage sounded like a conspiracy theorist on his show yesterday, but there are facts about CAIR (like who the founders are) that should / could be very interesting to expose to sunlight.

CAIR could lose their political influence.

The only downside is that the regular media may not bother to even report on this, even if some really nasty details come to light.

[NYC Republican]

Interesting comment he made last night... When they sued a web-site owner, the owner counter-sued... As soon as they asked where CAIR gets their funding, CAIR immediately withdrew their lawsuit...

As much as I can't stand Savage, usually, I hope he takes them out of business financially. Godspeed to him on his quest.

[kevinm13]

All of these suits will die in the discovery phase. Too bad, cause Weiner Nation should find whatever way to shut CAIR down.