Let's all say the word, TREASON.
1 posted on
12/01/2007 2:53:23 PM PST by
mdittmar
To: mdittmar
Ahhh ... but none dare
call it treason ... eh?
Excellent book, btw.
2 posted on
12/01/2007 3:01:20 PM PST by
knarf
(I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true.)
To: mdittmar
The definition of “national security” to the demoCRATS means only one thing.... Can they win the next National Elections....
3 posted on
12/01/2007 3:01:37 PM PST by
geo40xyz
((Born a democRAT, Dad set me free in 1952: He said that I was not required to be a MF'ing democRAT))
To: mdittmar
The Democrats may yet snatch defeat out of the jaws of victory. Theirs next November.
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
4 posted on
12/01/2007 3:05:16 PM PST by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
To: mdittmar
Show the campaign add of terrorists talking about taking over our elementary schools and then show Hillary as President granting terrorists the same rights as American citizens by rejecting surveilance of these calls... follwed by pictures of schools blowing up....
What possibly can Hillary say?
5 posted on
12/01/2007 3:09:42 PM PST by
tomnbeverly
(Lesson Learned From The Surge In Iraq. Democrats Can Never Be Trusted With National Security.)
To: mdittmar
OUCH!! That might leave a mark .. or two.
6 posted on
12/01/2007 3:18:02 PM PST by
CyberAnt
(AMERICA: THE GREATEST FORCE for good in the world!)
To: mdittmar
"First, for any who hadn't noticed, America is at war..."
But most Dhimmicrats believe that it is an entirely discretionary war. They call it "Bush's war". They drank the kool-aid that Bush lied us into an unnecessary war. That there wasn't a problem in the world until that evil GW came along. They've painted themselves into that corner and I'm eager to see how they'll get themselves out.
This is at the center of their dilemma on national security. The hildebeast gets it at least partially right when she says that she will continue to fund the military (although she has all the credibility of a rabid raccoon).
The rest appear to truly believe that the military exists to hand out care packages. Their constant chant is "I support the troops by bringing them home. Mindless, isn't it?!
In the end I have to trust that the American voter will see that none of the Dhimmi candidates have the capacity to be the big boss.
7 posted on
12/01/2007 3:19:24 PM PST by
rockrr
(Global warming is to science what Islam is to religion)
To: mdittmar
The Democrats' fatal
flaw flaw
s There, I fixed the title - too numerous to list.
8 posted on
12/01/2007 3:19:49 PM PST by
newfreep
("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." - P.J. O'Rourke)
To: mdittmar
9 posted on
12/01/2007 3:36:22 PM PST by
Christian4Bush
(Driscoll: "Secretary Heller, who's running CTU? You, or me?" Heller: "You are...unless I am.")
To: mdittmar
Unless the economy, stupid, overcomes war.
13 posted on
12/01/2007 4:52:16 PM PST by
ex-snook
("Above all things, truth beareth away the victory.")
To: mdittmar
Democrats have a growing anti-American wing in their party. Scoop Jackson is just a rotten corpse to them. It’s no accident that Democrats have garnered less than 50% of the vote in every election since 1968. No Democrat can be nominated if they ignore this anti-American wing. They are spoiled brats with money, most of it inherited. Many of them-like Hillary and Howard Dean are the children of old Republicans. They are the peacenik children of the sixties and their children. They have taken over the once reliably Republican state of Vermont, which was one of two states that voted for Alf Landon in 1936. They are socialists. These folks “loathe” the military. It will be important to point out how these Americans want to destroy—not defend—America. Bernie Sanders leads them in Vermont. He is a Democrat in all but name. I say give Bernie his Class War. The people who make America work are vastly not of his class. Yes, Democrats are weak on defense. But they also have not given up on slavery. You work, and if you are at all successful, more than half of the fruits of your labor will be confiscated to promote dependent classes who wallow in Democrat-sanctioned immorality. The future is bright for conservatives. The Reagan landslides of ‘80 and ‘84 will be repeated in most of our lifetimes. The congressional landslide of 1994 will look mild compared to what will happen if Democrats just keep being who they are. Thankfully, they just keep obliging.
To: mdittmar
Not to mention that they’re
commie bastards.
15 posted on
12/01/2007 5:50:26 PM PST by
Waco
To: AdmSmith; Berosus; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Fred Nerks; KlueLass; ...
Joe Klein, a politically astute columnist notably hard on George Bush, writes this in the Dec. 3 issue of Time magazine: "If the Democrats want to win in 2008, they can't be mealymouthed on issues of national security." Klein then proceeds to cite two matters, Iraq war funding and surveillance of terrorist communications, about which Democrats have been "foolishly partisan." Klein concludes by warning that if Democrats can't credibly promise to "protect the nation against enemies, foreign and domestic ... they simply will not win the presidency."
18 posted on
12/19/2007 8:03:37 PM PST by
SunkenCiv
(Profile updated Tuesday, December 18, 2007___________________https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: mdittmar
It would likely be fatal in a general election decided by the electorate's sensible center. and the extremely sensible right...
To: mdittmar
21 posted on
12/19/2007 8:17:19 PM PST by
Slicksadick
(Go out on a limb........Its where the fruit is.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson