Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
To: PatriotEdition
“Pores” is right.
“Grafs” is not.
2 posted on
12/02/2007 8:40:53 AM PST by
sinanju
To: PatriotEdition
Could the “news media” be anymore obsequious to Mrs Bill Clinton?
Patetic, simply, pathetic that any supposed “Journalist” would pen this level of total drivel.
3 posted on
12/02/2007 8:41:08 AM PST by
MNJohnnie
(What drug pushers do with drugs, politicians do with government subsides)
To: PatriotEdition
4 posted on
12/02/2007 8:41:30 AM PST by
doug from upland
(Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
To: PatriotEdition
You have the writer dead to rights on ‘grafs’, but miss on ‘pours’. One ‘pores’ over something which one is studying closely.
5 posted on
12/02/2007 8:41:30 AM PST by
Riley
(The Fourth Estate is the Fifth Column.)
To: PatriotEdition
That’s just the press showing off what a leftist education gets you.
6 posted on
12/02/2007 8:41:36 AM PST by
sionnsar
(trad-anglican.faithweb.com |Iran Azadi| 5yst3m 0wn3d - it's N0t Y0ur5 (SONY) | UN: Useless Nations)
To: PatriotEdition
I could be wrong, but shouldn't pores be "pours" and grafs be "graphs"? Graphs is correct but there was a recent discussion about pours/pores. I believe the people who know more about English than I do decided that pores was correct. I may be wrong, it's happened before.
7 posted on
12/02/2007 8:41:40 AM PST by
Graybeard58
( Remember and pray for SSgt. Matt Maupin - MIA/POW- Iraq since 04/09/04)
To: PatriotEdition
It was a small-enough incident.
But now I’ll sleep well at night knowing Hilary understands the NH Law Enforcement chain-of-command.
9 posted on
12/02/2007 8:43:52 AM PST by
sinanju
To: PatriotEdition
10 posted on
12/02/2007 8:44:54 AM PST by
tioga
(Dear Santa..........I can explain....)
To: PatriotEdition
13 posted on
12/02/2007 8:48:15 AM PST by
doug from upland
(Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
To: PatriotEdition
Hillary has like 150 campaign offices. She was probably not even told about this until it was over. She had ZERO to do with the outcome.
15 posted on
12/02/2007 8:49:13 AM PST by
LetsRok
To: PatriotEdition
I was in a Chinese restaurant Friday night picking up dinner and this was on the TV.
Some guy quipped “I wonder how much she paid him!”
The whole place burst out laughing!
16 posted on
12/02/2007 8:51:09 AM PST by
Scarchin
(+)
To: PatriotEdition
18 posted on
12/02/2007 8:51:43 AM PST by
doug from upland
(Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
To: PatriotEdition
I think she was very calm as well, amazingly so, considering the excitement and glee she must have experienced in knowing she would get some free press. Not to mention the opportunity to show how SHE would handle a crisis situation, when faced with terrorism. If the hostage situation would have continued I am sure she could have borrowed Janet Reno’s play book.
20 posted on
12/02/2007 8:53:05 AM PST by
Toespi
To: PatriotEdition
How would they know she was calm? She did not appear in public. She canceled her appearances.
To: PatriotEdition
pore 1 intr.v. pored, pores
To read or study carefully and attentively: pored over the classified ads in search of a new job.
To gaze intently; stare.
To meditate deeply; ponder: pored on the matter.
Onto more important matters... Clinton looked "regal"? This MSM bs is so over the top it's downright funny, lol.
23 posted on
12/02/2007 8:57:44 AM PST by
khnyny
(Although prepared for martyrdom, I preferred that it be postponed. Winston Churchill)
To: PatriotEdition
It’s guaranteed this story will be front and center in any and all pitches for hitlerycare from now on. This clown’s plight will be played up more than Rodney King’s beat down.
To: PatriotEdition
You knew this was going to happen. The media was going to spin this hostage thing into some positive for Hillary. In fact, I still expect to see it come out eventually that Eisenberg is a Hillary plant and the whole charade was to take the “CNN debate-Hillary plant” story off the cable news cycles because it was spinning badly not just for Clinton News Network but for also for Clinton, Inc. If the Clintons can get their people in as debate questioners for CNN, it’s got to be even easier for them to get their people into hostage situations at their own campaign headquarters.
27 posted on
12/02/2007 8:59:33 AM PST by
Tall_Texan
(No Third Term For Bill Clinton!)
To: PatriotEdition
She was home doing a poll on which lipstick color better matched her cashmere scarf.
Hillary Clinton speaks in front of her house after the standoff ended.
33 posted on
12/02/2007 9:11:15 AM PST by
Miss Didi
("Good heavens, woman, this is a war not a garden party!" Dr. Meade, Gone with the Wind)
To: PatriotEdition
Washington DC---->Manchester, NH.
482 miles per Mapquest.
Not exactly Road Flare Ground Zero.
39 posted on
12/02/2007 9:24:07 AM PST by
elli1
To: PatriotEdition
Why not be calm? She had something that would get her Shillaries off the front pages with something that seemed to make her appear a “victim”. There was nothing for her to do except make certain she got to New Hampshire AFTER the crisis was over...and she would be a winner regardless of whether the New Hampshire police were successful in getting the nutcase to surrender or whether he blew up or burned down her storefront campaign headquarters.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson