Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

[Senator] Craig's List Is Lengthening
ABC News ^ | Dec. 03, 2007 | By CHRIS FRANCESCANI and SCOTT MICHELS

Posted on 12/03/2007 10:49:57 AM PST by jdm

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last
Brutally-worded headline. :O)
1 posted on 12/03/2007 10:49:59 AM PST by jdm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Xenalyte

For the Salacious ping list?

/just kidding.


2 posted on 12/03/2007 10:50:28 AM PST by jdm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jdm

Does this mean his wife is qualifed to run for President now?


3 posted on 12/03/2007 10:50:49 AM PST by MNJohnnie (What drug pushers do with drugs, politicians do with government subsides)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

LOL


4 posted on 12/03/2007 10:53:17 AM PST by jdm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jdm

the headline is actually clever


5 posted on 12/03/2007 11:00:21 AM PST by RDTF ("Courage is resistance to fear, mastery of fear - not absence of fear". Mark Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jdm

It’s just sex.

Meanwhile we can’t “add” any scandals to the Clintons’ rap sheet, it’s just considered so much “old news”. Actually they are “inconvenient truths” that stand between the Clintons and a return to the White House.

Who’s Larry Craig? Some guy leaving Congress.

Who’s Robert Byrd? Someone who’s still in Congress.


6 posted on 12/03/2007 11:04:36 AM PST by weegee (End the Bush-Bush-Bush-Clinton/Clinton-Clinton/Clinton-Bush-Bush-Clinton/Clinton Oligarchy 1980-2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jdm

He’s not gay! Quite picking on him!


7 posted on 12/03/2007 11:07:18 AM PST by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jdm
The Senator is in session...


8 posted on 12/03/2007 11:07:31 AM PST by avacado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jdm

Does this mean he is up to eight or nine guys. There was a big list yesterday too. This guy is scum!!! He should resign. I guess he is trying to hold on as long as possible so when he is up for reelection, the people will have forgotten. I doubt highly they are going to forget this. Hey Senator Craig, take yourself and Senator Vitter out of the Senate NOW PLEASE!!! You both are a disgrace!


9 posted on 12/03/2007 11:08:17 AM PST by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RDTF
the headline is actually clever.

Yes, but it made me throw-up in my mouth a little.

10 posted on 12/03/2007 11:10:01 AM PST by jdm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: weegee

Other than completely devastating his family and leaving his reputation in ruins, what is the point of all this? He’s already said he’s not running for re-election, and if he were to resign immediately, the governor of Idaho is a Republican who would appoint another Republican. I’m actually surprised that the MSM is still pursuing this. Doesn’t Larry Flynt have dirt on any other Republican??


11 posted on 12/03/2007 11:13:59 AM PST by ChocChipCookie (Homeschool like your kids' lives depend on it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: jdm
thought this appropriate
12 posted on 12/03/2007 11:14:15 AM PST by SGCOS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jdm
Title could also have been:

"Craig's stance is widening"

13 posted on 12/03/2007 11:15:01 AM PST by river rat (Semper Fi - You may turn the other cheek, but I prefer to look into my enemy's vacant dead eyes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jdm

The ever-widening stance?


14 posted on 12/03/2007 11:15:38 AM PST by PBRSTREETGANG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jdm

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j2b1N74bQUE


15 posted on 12/03/2007 11:17:02 AM PST by MeanWestTexan (Kol Hakavod Fred Thompson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jdm

What’s Craig’s stance on these new allegations, or is he just going to stand back and let it all shake out first?


16 posted on 12/03/2007 11:19:51 AM PST by reagan_fanatic (Ron Paul put the cuckoo in my Cocoa Puffs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jdm

Craig’s lisp may be lengthening as well.


17 posted on 12/03/2007 11:20:06 AM PST by billhilly (I was republican when republican wasn't cool. (With an apology to Barbara Mandrell.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChocChipCookie
Other than completely devastating his family and leaving his reputation in ruins, what is the point of all this? He’s already said he’s not running for re-election, and if he were to resign immediately, the governor of Idaho is a Republican who would appoint another Republican.
That's right. If he got his gay ass out of there the governor could appoint a GOOD Republican. One who would be in a good spot to run for re-election in 2008.

This faggot is doing the work of Obama, Hillary and Edwards by doing his maggoty best to sabotage the Republican Party.

Too bad there's no way to pry his faggoty grip from his much-soiled and highly-besmirched Senate seat.

18 posted on 12/03/2007 11:24:46 AM PST by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator
>I guess he is trying to hold on as long as possible so . . .

--------------------------------------------------

Don't you misfire
Fill me up
With the desire
To carry on

Don't you know honey
That love's a game
It's always a hit or miss
So take your aim

Got to hold on tight
Shoot me out of sight

Don't you misfire
Fill me up
With the desire
To carry on

Your gun is loaded
And pointing my way
There's only one bullet
So don't delay
Got to time it right
Fire me through the night

Come on take a shot
Fire me higher
Don't you miss this time
Please don't
Misfire!



19 posted on 12/03/2007 11:26:18 AM PST by theFIRMbss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ChocChipCookie
Other than completely devastating his family and leaving his reputation in ruins, what is the point of all this?

I think there are a couple of points:

1) The Idaho Statesman is out to prove that its original reporting about Craig was right.

2) For the rest of us, I think it matters when a leader stands in front of the camera and claims one thing but the opposite is true. That's called lying. I thought it mattered that Clinton was lying when he said "I did not have sex with that woman," and I think it matters whether Craig is lying when he says he hasn't had sex with men. I want to know, and I think the rest of the citizens should know, whether our senators are liars.

20 posted on 12/03/2007 11:27:17 AM PST by mngran2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson