Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Parker v. Washington D.C. in HTML courtesy of zeugma.

We also note that at least three current members (and one former member) of the Supreme Court have read “bear Arms” in the Second Amendment to have meaning beyond mere soldiering: “Surely a most familiar meaning [of ‘carries a firearm’] is, as the Constitution’s Second Amendment (’keepand bear Arms’) and Black’s Law Dictionary . . . indicate: ‘wear, bear, or carry . . . upon the person or in the clothing or in a pocket, for the purpose . . . of being armed and ready for offensive or defensive action in a case of conflict with another person.” Muscarello v. United States, 524 U.S. 125, 143 (1998) (Ginsburg, J., dissenting, joined by Rehnquist, C.J., Scalia, J.,and Souter, J.) (emphasis in original). Based on the foregoing, we think the operative clause includes a private meaning for”bear Arms.”

More women pack heat

1 posted on 12/03/2007 9:36:57 PM PST by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: neverdem

Someone help me out here. I understand that the USSC is an appellate court, that is, they review the findings of a lower court to determine if the decision was ‘correct’. Can anyone clarify what the ‘issue’ was with the lower court’s decision that the USSC will rule on?

In any case, I pray that if the ruling has to do with the individual’s right to be armed, independent of any organized militia, the correct decision be made.

As someone has pointed out in another article, the idea that the government would need to codify your right to carry a weapon while under government service and authority is absurd. They may also have included that you have the right to wear a uniform as well.
On this basis alone, any 2nd grade civics student would realize that the 2nd Amendment secures an individual right to be armed. Period


2 posted on 12/04/2007 12:41:03 AM PST by Paisan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem; davidlachnicht; Eaker; Joe Brower; Just A Nobody; All

Ideas for signs, posters, billboards, taglines:

Keep Guns Out Of Criminal Hands! Support Capital Punishment!

Execute Criminals = No Guns In Criminal Hands

Swift Sure Capital Punishment = No Criminals Have Guns


4 posted on 12/04/2007 6:59:24 AM PST by The Spirit Of Allegiance (Public Employees: Honor Your Oaths! Defend the Constitution from Enemies--Foreign and Domestic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Bad link. It’s :
http://www.zprc.org/legal/parkervdc.html


6 posted on 12/04/2007 9:07:03 AM PST by Atlas Sneezed ("We do have tough gun laws in Massachusetts; I support them, I won't chip away at them" -Mitt Romney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson