[ejonesie22]

I think Iowa could be Mitt’s Waterloo. If Huck beats him after spending a tenth the money, well that would be a colossal failure for the great business man.

Ironic that his “strength” so well touted amongst many on these very pages could be his undoing. How can he sell himself as a fiscal conservative with a successful business baclkgroud if he is willing to lose that kind of money on a fruitless effort.

[Beagle8U]

When he loses Iowa and Michigan he is toast for the nomination and must decide how much more cash he is willing to waste.

[Route66]

Wow! This shows how fast things can change. The droning Rudy lead is now history, Mitt’s waning, and the door is open. People are beginning to take a look at the other candidates and we are off and running. There is nothing but opportunity in these numbers.

Go Fred!

[WOSG]

G H W Bush didn’t win in Iowa in 1988, either, to an evangelical favorite - Pat Robertson. I guess that ended his hopes. Not.

Or maybe plan B is:
- People realize Huck is a lousy candidate who’s really a tax-and-spend non-conservative populist and find someone better. Like, Romney or .... Thompson.

http://taxhikemike.org/
http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=NmI2ZWZmYTEyMTZhMGI3NTM2ZDRhZTNiMzk2YzU5ZDQ=