Posted on 12/05/2007 7:23:56 PM PST by ricks_place
I'd be interesting to see the background of the signers. You know they are believers as most are in Bali.
Okay, I have got this one....Leading LIBERAL BOLSHEVIK Scientists insist on strong global warming treaty.
Much better.
Best regards,
The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the
populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to
safety) by menacing it with an endless series of
hobgoblins, all of them imaginary.
- H. L. Mencken
They should stop exhaling.
“Quick....it’s so dang cold so early this year, we must pass this into universal law before the dolts realize what a hoax this is!”
~~ AGW™ ping~~
Was in Barnes & Noble today and in the Christian Book section of the store was a title in large bold letters you could not miss about 5 shelves up: GLOBAL WARMING
Thought, how odd!
How do you define a “leading scientist?” One who adheres to the anthropogenic theory of climate change?
One who leads ass (donkeys).
Atmospheric concentrations of CO2 could be reduced with good chemical engineering and good research, in order to develop something to remove CO2 without drastically reducing emissions.
The climate scientists advocating this superregulation of industry are socialists.
“Men, it has been well said, think in herds; it will be seen that they go mad in herds, while they only recover their senses slowly, and one by one.”
Charles Mackay, author of “Incredible Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds”(1841)
“take radical measures to slow down global warming as “there is no time to lose.”
Because the climate looks like it is cooling right now! The megastorms predicted for 2006 were nonexistent, and 2007 hurricanes likewise did not meet predictions.
We must lock down the treaties RIGHT NOW before the sheeple wake up and stop us!
PRAVDA.....Now that is all you need to know.
>>
Over 200 of the leading climate scientists impelled government leaders to take radical measures to slow down global warming as “there is no time to lose.”
<<
In the 1930’s many leading scientists impelled government to take radical measures to slow down the reproduction of “undesirable” groups.
“The masses of Negroes ...particularly in the South, still breed carelessly and disastrously, with the result that the increase among Negroes, even more than among whites, is from that portion of the population least intelligent and fit...” — Margaret Sanger
On the list of Signatories I see few climatologists.
Is there a difference?
“Leading climate scientists”
s/b
“Infamous Demagogues”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.