Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

IBM researchers build supercomputer-on-a-chip
NetworkWorld ^ | 6 December 2007 | Agam Shah

Posted on 12/06/2007 12:07:41 PM PST by ShadowAce

Supercomputers may soon be the same size as a laptop if IBM brings to market research detailed on Thursday, in which pulses of light replace electricity to make data transfer between processor cores on a chip up to one-hundred times faster.

The technology, called silicon nanophotonics, replaces some of the wires on a chip with pulses of light on tiny optical fibers for quicker and more power-efficient data transfers between cores on a chip, said Will Green, research scientist at IBM.

The technology, which can transfers data up to a distance of a few centimeters, is about 100 times faster than wires and consumes one-tenth as much power, Green said. The lower power requirement should reduce operational costs for supercomputers, he said.

"The silicon nanophotonic effort is a high-bandwidth, low-power technology for cores to communicate," Green said.

The technical basis of this research is the same science that led to the development of optical fiber and Internet communications. Silicon nanophotonics brings similar optical communication on chips for centimeters instead of miles, Green said.

The improved data bandwidth and power efficiency of silicon nanophotonics will bring massive computing power to desks, Green said. "We'll be able to have hundreds or thousands of cores on a chip," Green said. Users will be able to render virtual worlds in real-time and have a better gaming experience, he said.

Modulators sitting in each core convert light into pulses that travels over optical fibers in the silicon chip. The modulators don't take up too much space on the chip, Green said.

Silicon nanophotonics is part of a long-term research project and could be implemented in chips within 10 to 12 years, he said.

More cores are being added to chips to boost performance, but electrical wiring that connects cores on current chips doesn't transfer data effectively in these situations, Green said. Electrical wiring suffers from overheating and data signals travel only a few millimeters from one core to another before breaking down, Green said. Silicon photonics sends signals for many centimeters in a power-efficient mode without an attempt to reconstruct the signal, Green said.

Though the technology shows potential to replace copper wires for data transfer on chips, electrical wiring still does well over short distances. Copper wire is essential for transistors in chips to communicate, while silicon nanophotonic technology is used for cores to communicate. "We're complementing the capabilities of copper with our optical technology," Green said.

In addition to IBM, there are a couple of start-up companies and labs in the U.S. that are working on silicon nanophotonics technology, Green said. The IBM project was funded partly by Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), a division of the U.S. Department of Defense.


TOPICS: Technical
KEYWORDS: ibm; supercomputer
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

1 posted on 12/06/2007 12:07:42 PM PST by ShadowAce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rdb3; chance33_98; Calvinist_Dark_Lord; PenguinWry; GodGunsandGuts; CyberCowboy777; Salo; Bobsat; ..

2 posted on 12/06/2007 12:07:55 PM PST by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

The first consumer application will be viewing online 3D porn.


3 posted on 12/06/2007 12:10:18 PM PST by Sgt_Schultze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Open the Pod Bay door HAL


4 posted on 12/06/2007 12:14:52 PM PST by isaiah55version11_0 (For His Glory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Sgt_Schultze

remote tactile stimulation?


5 posted on 12/06/2007 12:16:09 PM PST by robomatik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

Don’t worry, Bill will make some bloatware for it to make it run slower than molasses in February.


6 posted on 12/06/2007 12:16:50 PM PST by taxed2death (A few billion here, a few trillion there...we're all friends right?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: taxed2death

Perhaps, but at least it’ll run cooler than my current laptop!


7 posted on 12/06/2007 12:18:03 PM PST by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

Porn at the speed of light!............


8 posted on 12/06/2007 12:19:22 PM PST by Red Badger ( We don't have science, but we do have consensus.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

Vista might run pretty well on one of those...


9 posted on 12/06/2007 12:21:45 PM PST by Interesting Times (ABCNNBCBS -- yesterday's news.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Interesting Times

heh—if you turn off half of its featues....


10 posted on 12/06/2007 12:22:39 PM PST by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

Today’s laptop is (almost) always yesterday’s supercomputer.


11 posted on 12/06/2007 12:24:03 PM PST by DancesWithBolsheviks (If someone is 'turning his life around' you best stay away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Interesting Times
Vista might run pretty well on one of those...

But XP Pro would still outperform it.

12 posted on 12/06/2007 12:29:40 PM PST by The Cajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

Amazing.

How long until the Chinese steal it?


13 posted on 12/06/2007 12:33:07 PM PST by snowrip (Liberal? YOU ARE A SOCIALIST WITH NO RATIONAL ARGUMENT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: isaiah55version11_0
That was about as effective as "Bomb, this is Lt. Doolittle. You are *not* to detonate in the bomb bay. I repeat, you are NOT to detonate in the bomb bay!" would turn out to be.
14 posted on 12/06/2007 12:33:19 PM PST by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce
.

"Oh, computer...."

15 posted on 12/06/2007 12:39:06 PM PST by AxelPaulsenJr (Fred Thompson for President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sgt_Schultze

well, that’s where the bucks are... porn funded Cisco and Microsoft and the rest of the dot.com boom after all.


16 posted on 12/06/2007 12:53:41 PM PST by chilepepper (The map is not the territory -- Alfred Korzybski)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: chilepepper
porn funded Cisco and Microsoft and the rest of the dot.com boom after all.

As well as being the deciding factor in the BetaMax vs. VHS wars

17 posted on 12/06/2007 1:14:16 PM PST by tx_eggman ("Believing without loving turns the best of creeds into a weapon of oppression" Eugene Peterson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

Awwww.... it was all going great until the “available in 10 to 12 years” part.


18 posted on 12/06/2007 1:17:10 PM PST by Dr. Zzyzx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chilepepper

It is a dark commentary on human nature that most technological innovations were prompted by war, and most media innovations are financed in their initial development by pornography: salacious novels were much of the initial business for the Guttenberg printing press, most photographic supplies purchased in Victorian England went to pornographers, VHS won over the techically superior Betamax format due to the porn industry’s preference for cheaper technology, and the first profitable online business was porn.


19 posted on 12/06/2007 1:31:26 PM PST by The_Reader_David (And when they behead your own people in the wars which are to come, then you will know. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: DancesWithBolsheviks

The first Cray-1 system was installed at Los Alamos National Laboratory in 1976 for $8.8 million. It boasted a world-record speed of 133 million floating-point operations per second (133 megaflops) and an 8 megabyte (1 million word) main memory.

Todays average laptop is enormously more powerful than the old cray...


20 posted on 12/06/2007 1:37:35 PM PST by Bobalu (I guess I done see'd that varmint for the last time....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson