Posted on 12/13/2007 2:14:18 AM PST by fabrizio
TO THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES:
I am returning herewith without my approval H.R. 3963, the "Children's Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2007." Like its predecessor, H.R. 976, this bill does not put poor children first and it moves our country's health care system in the wrong direction. Ultimately, our Nation's goal should be to move children who have no health insurance to private coverage --not to move children who already have private health insurance to government coverage. As a result, I cannot sign this legislation.
The purpose of the State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) was to help low-income children whose families were struggling, but did not qualify for Medicaid, to get the health care coverage that they needed. My Administration strongly supports reauthorization of SCHIP. That is why in February of this year I proposed a 5-year reauthorization of SCHIP and a 20 percent increase in funding for the program.
Some in the Congress have sought to spend more on SCHIP than my budget proposal. In response, I told the Congress that I was willing to work with its leadership to find any additional funds necessary to put poor children first, without raising taxes.
The leadership in the Congress has refused to meet with my Administration's representatives. Although they claim to have made "substantial changes" to the legislation, H.R. 3963 is essentially identical to the legislation that I vetoed in October. The legislation would still shift SCHIP away from its original purpose by covering adults. It would still include coverage of many individuals with incomes higher than the median income in the United States. It would still result in government health care for approximately 2 million children who already have private health care coverage. The new bill, like the old bill, does not responsibly offset its new and unnecessary spending, and it still raises taxes on working Americans.
Because the Congress has chosen to send me an essentially identical bill that has the same problems as the flawed bill I previously vetoed, I must veto this legislation, too. I continue to stand ready to work with the leaders of the Congress, on a bipartisan basis, to reauthorize the SCHIP program in a way that puts poor children first; moves adults out of a program meant for children; and does not abandon the bipartisan tradition that marked the original enactment of the SCHIP program. In the interim, I call on the Congress to extend funding under the current program to ensure no disruption of services to needy children.
GEORGE W. BUSH
THE WHITE HOUSE,
December 12, 2007.
One thing you got to give to the democrat leaders. They are persistent. Keep that veto pen handy.
The Demons will scream that W HATES CHILDREN when he really hates socialism. The Demons now will DO NOTHING and the spending bills will languish, all for the purpose of demonstrating that the Demon-controlled Congress was elected to change the course of America - right down the toilet. Sorry Dingy Harry and Fancy Nancy, the American people ain’t oging to and aren’t buying it!
President Bush made his reason quite clear here.
Will the news media will also write this up completely, or will they just put the headline and ignore the rest?
Jeez, hot a peep throughout his first term, and now he’s vetoing like it’s going out of style.
When I look at who is running to replace this man... outside of Hunter and Thompson... one thing rings crystal clear... I am going to miss this President when he is gone. He seems liberal until you compare him with rootiemcromneyhuckaliar.
LLS
Trustfund hippies and gentleman carpenters deeply saddened.
Apparently, now we start the approach to socialized medicine all over again with a ‘temporary’ funding? And the dems keep waiting for more repugs to cave, rather than being seen as ‘anti-children’? That’s what their strategy is, and they want this BAD(probably because it’s the beginning of hillarycare), and they smell blood.
You don’t pull the lever until the noose is well in place.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.