Posted on 12/15/2007 9:16:05 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach
AFTER more than three years as an interpreter for American troops in the city of Falluja, Dave (not his real name) recently had his hair cut for the first time by a local barber. Since then, several American marines based inside the city of some 300,000 people have also had their crew-cut domes locally shaved to a gleam. Six months ago they would have had their throats slitand so, almost certainly, would the barber.
But times have changed dramatically. Once widely considered the most dangerous and xenophobic city in Iraq and one of the country's most resilient havens of al-Qaeda, Falluja is now enjoying a new, if tentative, peace. So, no less strikingly, is the whole of Anbar province, in which Falluja lies, and most of the Euphrates river valley. The Americans say that if you go north and north-west through Hit and Haditha and up to the border with Syria near the town of Qaim, it is clear that al-Qaeda has been chased outwith the co-operation of the local Sunnis and the tribal leaders. In those areas, which embrace the vast majority of Iraq's Sunni Arabs outside Baghdad, attacks against the American-led coalition forces have dropped more than tenfold compared with a year ago.
The peace in Falluja is fragile, as it is in the Sunni parts elsewhere. There is no knowing what would happen if the Americans left in a hurry. It is unclear whether al-Qaeda in Iraq (known in Western military circles as AQI) has been truly defeated or is biding its time.
(Excerpt) Read more at economist.com ...
But however temporary it may prove to be, it is an extraordinary change.
From a UK paper....
Suggestions for future stories for The Economist to cover:
OAKLAND: Can a lull be turned into a real peace?
PHILADELPHIA: Can a lull be turned into a real peace?
NEW ORLEANS: Can a lull be turned into a real peace?
DETROIT: Can a lull be turned into a real peace?
Progress In Iraq Creates Sunni Heros To Replace Bin Laden As The Arab-Muslim Icon
********************EXCERPT*********************
I am not going to write extensively on these stories on Iraq, but they are must reads to see how the debate on Iraq is shifting with the progress inside Iraq.
First up is an Economist article that covers all the progress and notes things could still go bad, but could also (more likely) go well in Iraq.
*********************see above article****************
The authors cant let go of their pessimism, even in light of all the progress they report. As you read it the grudging nature of the reporting is evident. But the facts and data presented in this article are really good and show how broad and deep the progress has been in Iraq.
This story from RCP highlights the new leaders in Iraq - the Sunnis who through off al-Qaedas yoke and whip.
****************************
Posted by AJStrata on Friday, December 14th, 2007 at 9:01 am.
Do read the rest at the Blog as he comments on several articles and their spin...............
Yes,....see link at #4.
There isn’t even a lull in Philly. I tell you, the city’s gone to hell in a handbasket.
U.S. military personnel are safer in Falluja than they are in Seattle.
US Military is more liked in Iraq than they are in San Fagsisco.
Pray for W and Our Amazing Troops
Well put.
Nor is it certain that the local Sunni tribal leaders who have struck security deals with the Americans across Anbar province would, if the Americans left, make war or peace with the Shia-dominated government in Baghdad. But however temporary it may prove to be, it is an extraordinary change.One of several reasons the Sunni started to work against al-Qaeda was contemplation of a precipitous US withdrawal.
It's because of those damned homophobic boy scouts. Philly was a peaceful place when Brotherly Love was tolerated.
I think we also try to look at peace on our terms and from our perspective. The simple fact is that muslim lands are violent places with or without us. I guess I wish liberals would learn to accept that there is plenty of violence in that part of the world and expecting peace like we have in America is an unrealistic expectation.
Back to Pakistan and Afghanistan and northern Africa.
Lulling in Falluja ping.
The economist is not exactly what you would call a “UK paper”. It is one of the oldest most respected weeklies in world and is generally considered one of the best English language publications around. Over 50% of their readership is in the US.
The world is a violent place with or without us, but a lot more so without us. Around the end of the Cold War a foreign policy analyst(sorry the name escapes me) noted that we should not expect tranquility but rather "a violent peace." Liberal moonbeams yelped in protest at such a concept. But it is and as been and always will be the rule rather than the exception.
I agree with you, we could leave Iraq, with a reasonably stable government engaged in a low level running fight with bands of jihadis and other rabble, and be justified in calling it a complete success. Even though occasional killings will most likely continue indefinitely.
So is the peace in London, just as it is in the parts elsewhere in Britain...
I recently read there are a total of 300 Marines in Fallujah. Their role may be critical but the majority of the “peace” must be in place already.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.