Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

China's economy smaller in new measure, still number two: study
AFP ^ | Dec. 17, 2007 | staff

Posted on 12/17/2007 7:52:12 AM PST by tlb

WASHINGTON (AFP) - The size of China's economy is overestimated by some 40 percent based on most current measures, but is the world's second largest, the World Bank said Monday.

In a report ranking the world's economies, the World Bank said a more reliable method of estimation using "purchasing power parity" (PPP) shows a much smaller value than the traditional market value estimates which the Bank called "less reliable."

The study carried out by the World Bank and other partners was "the most extensive and thorough effort" to measure the relative size of 146 economies using the PPP method which strips out the effect of exchange rates, a Bank statement said.

China participated in the survey for the first time and India for the first time since 1985.

China still ranks as the world's second largest economy with over nine percent of world production, but that compared with 14 percent under the old methodology.

India is the fifth largest with over four percent of the world total, up from two percent using market exchange rates.

In the study, the United States still has the world's biggest economy with 23 percent of global output, but that is down from 29 percent using market rates.

Japan ranks third under the PPP method with seven percent of global output, lower than using market rates.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS:
40 % slide from overtaking the US. This story matters but I am certain it won't get much play.
1 posted on 12/17/2007 7:52:12 AM PST by tlb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: tlb

Incoming group headed to this thread.

The “China is going to destroy America next year, and WalMart and G. Bush are to blame” Crowd.


2 posted on 12/17/2007 8:02:17 AM PST by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tlb

The US slid too, but China’s still a little over 1/3 our size. At 23% of the world economy, that pretty much walks over criticism that we have too large a carbon footprint.

I see we produce 22.2 percent of the worlds carbon emissions. Since it’s smaller than our percent of the world’s economy, I wonder if we’ll get a medal or something...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_carbon_dioxide_emissions

I see we also reduced our carbon output by 1.3% for the first time in 2006: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/05/23/AR2007052301510.html

Too bad global warming is not man made...


3 posted on 12/17/2007 8:21:40 AM PST by elfman2 ("As goes Fallujah, so goes central Iraq and so goes the entire country" -Col Coleman, USMC ,4/2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elfman2

In once sense that is good, It means we can do more with less... One thing Americans have been brilliant at doing since the first settlers arrived from Europe. The best and brightest then came here, and it still holds true today.


4 posted on 12/17/2007 9:36:40 AM PST by Danae (Anail nathrach, orth' bhais's bethad, do chel denmha (Smoke clears and Fred Thompson is President))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: tlb

But they’re still a “developing country”, thus they receive exemption from from the Global Warming fiasco.


5 posted on 12/17/2007 10:02:23 AM PST by Mad_Tom_Rackham (Elections have consequences.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tlb

The failure to properly denote the true scope of China’s military (which is kept heavily secret...by both them and the our own NIE Fifth Columnist type guys) understates the true size of their economy.


6 posted on 12/17/2007 10:32:26 AM PST by Paul Ross (Ronald Reagan-1987:"We are always willing to be trade partners but never trade patsies.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sam_paine
The “China is going to destroy America next year, and WalMart and G. Bush are to blame” Crowd.

Show a post where someone said that China was going to destroy America next year. Most patriots on this site have voiced their concern over the lopsided trade deals we have with China and what will happen to our economy over the LONG term by continually allowing it to happen.

7 posted on 12/17/2007 11:16:54 AM PST by am452 (If you don't stand behind our troops feel free to stand in front of them!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: am452

WAKE UP! WE’RE ALL GONNA DIE BECAUSE CHINA GETS MONEY FROM WALMART!!!

lol.


8 posted on 12/17/2007 11:32:37 AM PST by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: elfman2

You wrote, “The US slid too, but China’s still a little over 1/3 our size.”

I’m not sure what that means. Are you meaning that they are 3x our size? I’m not being snarky; just inquisitive.


9 posted on 12/17/2007 11:56:00 AM PST by Theo (Global warming "scientists." Pro-evolution "scientists." They're both wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sam_paine
WAKE UP! WE’RE ALL GONNA DIE BECAUSE CHINA GETS MONEY FROM WALMART!!! lol.

That's the best response you can come up with? Oh that's right your original response was crap.

10 posted on 12/17/2007 12:29:32 PM PST by am452 (If you don't stand behind our troops feel free to stand in front of them!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Theo
"You wrote, “The US slid too, but China’s still a little over 1/3 our size.”

I’m not sure what that means. Are you meaning that they are 3x our size? I’m not being snarky; just inquisitive."

Theo, I suppose I could have phrased that a little better. The US slid from 29% to 23% while China slid from 14% to 9% as I recall. 9% is a little over 1/3rd of 23%.

11 posted on 12/17/2007 5:30:30 PM PST by elfman2 ("As goes Fallujah, so goes central Iraq and so goes the entire country" -Col Coleman, USMC ,4/2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: elfman2

Gotcha. I was thinking “size” in terms of number of people, or square miles. “Size” in terms of economy makes sense in the context of this article.

I was surprised to hear this, frankly. I, like many others, had been thinking China was overtaking our economy.


12 posted on 12/17/2007 6:52:24 PM PST by Theo (Global warming "scientists." Pro-evolution "scientists." They're both wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson