Skip to comments.
Bush's phone immunity bill wins Senate vote
Reuters ^
| Mon Dec 17, 2007 7:50pm
| By Thomas Ferraro
Posted on 12/17/2007 5:08:20 PM PST by xcamel
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-91 next last
Hmmm...
1
posted on
12/17/2007 5:08:22 PM PST
by
xcamel
To: xcamel
companies should be thanked, not punished, for helping defend the United States.
2
posted on
12/17/2007 5:10:56 PM PST
by
Old Sarge
(This tagline in memory of FReeper 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub)
To: Old Sarge
Right Comrades. If you did nothing wrong you have nothink to fear.... yet.
3
posted on
12/17/2007 5:15:18 PM PST
by
cva66snipe
(Proud Partisan Constitution Supporting Conservative to which I make no apologies for nor back down)
To: Old Sarge
4
posted on
12/17/2007 5:17:13 PM PST
by
RDTF
(Remember Pearl Harbor)
To: xcamel
Dingy said a little while ago that he intends to table the bill til January.
5
posted on
12/17/2007 5:25:20 PM PST
by
soupcon
(l)
To: xcamel
TELCOs win the immunity challenge. Good for them.
6
posted on
12/17/2007 5:26:27 PM PST
by
afnamvet
(Duncan Hunter in 08)
To: xcamel
"his warrantless domestic spying program"Damn it, these lefties make me sick. Let them live in the world of their making for a week. They'd be begging the Marines to do anything to save them.
7
posted on
12/17/2007 5:26:46 PM PST
by
Eagles6
To: Eagles6
8
posted on
12/17/2007 5:27:29 PM PST
by
xcamel
(FDT/2008)
To: RDTF
could cause a revolution...best not keep the public informed!
I smell a democrat.....
life and death decisions......
Everyday, Ever Minute,
How many want the job?
There is a Man, presently who handles the football
Haven't a clue, as to what color it is?
But it too is another fashion statement.....
Wonder who (down here) is making them?
lol....
George? It that you.....
Then the line on the phone burned up like a fuse on a stick of .....
Luckily there was a cell phone to call and complain over.
Dead Lines.......But still like 'em.
9
posted on
12/17/2007 5:29:59 PM PST
by
no-to-illegals
(God Bless Our Men and Women in Uniform, Our Heroes. And Vote For Mr. Duncan Hunter, America! TLWNW)
To: traviskicks
10
posted on
12/17/2007 5:33:30 PM PST
by
KoRn
To: xcamel
Editing by Patricia Zengerle and David Wiessler
Dear Pat and Dave,
If you could for a moment put aside your hatred for a moment and assume the responsibilities of what is presumed when you tag yourself as editors.
Whom you refer to as Bush is the President of these United States, hence, one would think that in the editing process you would have inserted the title President in front of Bush.
Reuters, you are a despicable news (dis) organization.
11
posted on
12/17/2007 5:35:19 PM PST
by
FMBass
("Now that I'm sober I watch a lot of news"- Garofalo from Coulter's "Treason")
To: xcamel
Bush's spying programNo bias at al-Reuters; none at all.
12
posted on
12/17/2007 5:46:04 PM PST
by
hsalaw
To: afnamvet
TELCOs win the immunity challenge.They have won nothing, unless this immunity becomes law. San Fran Nan's House must still approve. The House leadership is beholden to the left wing blogosphere.
13
posted on
12/17/2007 5:51:18 PM PST
by
Repeal 16-17
(Let me know when the Shooting starts.)
To: xcamel
Why not let the courts decide if privacy rights have been violated? Courts ought to adjudicate the constitutionality, anyway.
To: Repeal 16-17
They have won nothing, unless this immunity becomes law. San Fran Nan's House must still approve. The House leadership is beholden to the left wing blogosphere. I hope they do stop it. I'm not against the monitoring of terrorist activity. I am however against the DOJ having the power to listen in to anyones communications including mine or your without obtaining a probable cause court order first. No I do not trust the DOJ.
Obtaining such does not mean the suspect must be notified. I think I'll file this thread away and see how quick the supporters of this change their minds if say Hillary wins? Does anyone want a DOJ ran by the likes of her with this type authority? I don't sure. The DEM's have better than a 50% chance of a two house and white house majority. Think people think. It's not about a Bush victory it is about surrendering our own rights.
15
posted on
12/17/2007 5:59:25 PM PST
by
cva66snipe
(Proud Partisan Constitution Supporting Conservative to which I make no apologies for nor back down)
To: xcamel
16
posted on
12/17/2007 6:17:49 PM PST
by
Southack
(Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
To: xcamel
a vote of 76-10, far more than the 60 needed I'm thinking of a certain website (see tagline) where the server is going to melt with the publication of this news.
17
posted on
12/17/2007 6:35:46 PM PST
by
Hardastarboard
(DemocraticUnderground.com is an internet hate site.)
To: Hardastarboard
nothing would make me happier...
well... almost nothing...
18
posted on
12/17/2007 6:37:49 PM PST
by
xcamel
(FDT/2008)
To: Puddleglum
Why not let the courts decide if privacy rights have been violated? Because in the process the methods and procedures get disclosed.
19
posted on
12/17/2007 6:41:42 PM PST
by
Raycpa
To: cva66snipe
I think I'll file this thread away and see how quick the supporters of this change their minds if say Hillary wins? We would need it more than ever.
20
posted on
12/17/2007 6:43:28 PM PST
by
Raycpa
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-91 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson