Posted on 12/18/2007 4:51:48 PM PST by wagglebee
This stuff is inevitable once homosexuality becomes uncloseted. Homosexuals need to recruit, so they are compelled to target children.
In addition, homosexuals themselves know that their behavior is unnatural. When homosexuality is in the closet, and society doesn’t permit it to be flaunted openly, homosexuals mostly keep their perversion private and don’t bother others. But once homosexuality is uncloseted, things change. Homosexuals begin demanding that their behavior be ratified by every institution in society.
I’ve mentioned this many times before, but it’s like the story of the emperor’s new clothes. Homosexuals need to constantly be assured that their behavior is normal, because it so obviously isn’t. Just as the emperor needed to be constantly assured by everyone that he was fully clothed in fine attire, the homosexuals need for literally everyone to pay homage to their behavior. If even one person, even a child, dissents, then their ego is completely deflated.
This is why there can never be a “libertarian” attitude on homosexuality. Homosexuality must either be held in check, in the closet, or its practitioners will use government power to suppress everyone who disapproves of it. It’s a compulsion homosexuals can’t resist by the very attributes of their perversion.
Homosexuals target children because it's highly unlikely that 12 year old boys have AIDS.
I
can’t
breathe
and
They target them because they are attracted to them.
I doubt that they give more than a passing thought or care about the consequences of such perverted behavior.
After all, in the new, diversity is strength, feelings trump learning, buy everyone a puppy, eco friendly, mankind is a parasite on Earth polluting it with our breath mentality that pervades America today, being a homo is in perfect harmony.
The schools are a fallen edifice standing as monuments to a failed system.
Idiot REgressives.
ping & a big grrrrrrrr
Schwarzenegger should give in and give sheep the vote, but keep adoption illegal for homosexuals.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
It is time that Christian teachers abandoned the government schools. Christian teachers need to be building up Christian education in their own congregations. They can do this by helping pastors open traditional schools, homeschools, and group homeschooling.
Once Christian education is on a firm footing in a congregation, then they should welcome other children and fellowship the parents of these children.
Finally, if Harvard can have a $35 billion endowment, why can’t Christians establish private scholarship endowments so that every child in the U.S. could have a private Christian education if his parents desired it? We are a wealthy nation. Christians could do this if they wanted.
I think that that is a fascinating idea.
How would you go about starting and doing that?
I'm willing to try something in that line as part of a broader overarching construct.
Maybe for some places it is too far gone. San Francisco, New Yahk, Los Angeles. If Mrs. Othniel and I lived there, then we would homeschool, no question. But there are lights out there, and I believe my site is one of them.
As for the 85%, I know that's probably tied in to going to a secular university....alone....away from parents or any other means of support. But with parents who are aware of the risks, a shorter leash is a better idea. A lot of parents don't discuss what happens in class when kids are in college. Too bad. How many parents just toss their kids out the door when they finish high school, instead of keeping them around, examining what they spend their money on, spending the time to do research about the teachers and the classes? When I left for university, I knew nobody, had no church, none of that. But I found friends, got plugged in to a church, and didn't fall away. But that was years ago.
Not everyone is made to homeschool. Even though my kids go to a government school, Mrs. Othniel and I are very careful to ask for, and get, literature lists, copies of science curriucula, and the like. We push for what we want, and it tells the school that we are aware of what is out there. We have never been dissatisfied with any of our kids' teachers. The few bumps the state books have put in our road have been dealt with, by either me or Mrs. O. (who has a masters in English Lit, for which she had to slog through, and reject, a lot of opinions and interepretations of Shakespeare and the like). We have openly discussed, as much as is age appropriate, homosexuality. The kids know what it is, know it's out there, and know that it is wrong is God's eyes. They know that our Lord Jesus loves gays, but won't tolerate the sin ("Would God let an unrepentant axe murderer into heaven?"). We have good talks about it.
Again, thank you for your reply. Let me state again that I reject this SB 777, and will pray against it, completely disobey it, and violently defend my students against it and any of its swishy proponents. God Bless You, and Merry Christmas!
The "EEEW" factor goes up considerably when they realize I'm right....
http://www.lds.org/ldsfoundation/accelwork/priority/0,7476,536-1-211,00.html
For instance, if it costs $4,000/child/ year at a traditional brick and mortar-type school, then over that child’s lifetime he and his parents would donate that amount ( and **more**) to the fund. The student ( as well as other sympathetic Christians) could bequeath money to the fund in their wills, and assign a portion of life insurance policies.
As the fund grew, it would eventually become a pure gift and not a loan.
However,,,I think we should abandon the idea of traditional brick and mortar schools. With today’s technology it would be possible to have many group homeschools, or “one room school houses” meeting in members’ homes, with churches ( and their Christian teachers) merely acting as facilitators. The cost could and should be far, far less than $4,000 a year.
The answer to this question will clarify your writing:
Are you, or are you not a dues-paying member of the NEA?
Arnold vetoed this a year ago. Why did he sign it this time?
Ugh. I feel sick.
ping!
I support efforts to overturn SB 777, but the gay rights movement does not exist in a vacuum. We have sex outside of marriage, easy divorce, abortion on demand, sex used to sell in advertising, sex in movies... We’re not at the edge of a slippery slope; we’ve been going down it for at least 40 years. What used to be shocking and unmentionable is now met with a shrug.
“The tail wags the dog again. Because gays are so over-represented in the mass media and politics, 2 percent of the population dictates the agenda of the other 98 percent.”
And these sickos intend to have full access to the kids of the 98% able to reproduce. Let me know when you figure out a way to stop this most degenerate of all social movements.
The ultimate in sexual harrassment is to allow perverts to enter a school and force kids to accept this degeneracy. How and why should the queers be allowed to do this?
Whose got the “another reason to homeschool” pinglist, anyway?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.