Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Choice is clear: McCain’s the one (Boston Herald endorses McCain)
Boston Herald ^ | 12/20/07 | Boston Herald editorial staff

Posted on 12/20/2007 6:39:06 PM PST by Norman Bates

There are times in this nation’s history so perilous that they cry out for a steady, experienced leader, a person so trusted that we would put the fate of this country in his hands.

This is one of those times, and Sen. John McCain is that person.

He has a brand of courage that is rare in the public arena these days - a courage forged in part by those years spent as a prisoner of war in Vietnam and in part by more than two decades of fighting for what he believes in on the floor of the U.S. Senate.

In an age when too many candidates are driven by polls and focus groups, fashioning and re-fashioning their “core” beliefs, McCain is a man of unwavering conviction and integrity. His values, his beliefs, his goals are what they were when he first entered public life, what they were in 2000 and what they will be a decade from now.

And those goals include a safe and secure America, a country that is respected around the world for honoring its commitments, for encouraging and respecting the rule of law whether in Baghdad or Guantanamo Bay.

During a meeting with Herald editors and reporters Wednesday McCain was accompanied by James Woolsey, a man who has served in two Republican and two Democratic administrations, including a stint as CIA director under President Clinton. If Woolsey’s presence was designed to send a message - well, message received, at a number of levels. Yes, McCain is well regarded by those who share his commitment to national security. And, yes again, there are those who operate above the partisan fray.

The two men were passionately critical of the latest National Intelligence Estimates that downplayed the danger of a nuclear Iran.

“It’s not up to the intelligence community to make policy,” McCain said, adding that their conclusions about Iran’s future nuclear capability is “not substaniated by the facts on the ground.”

The war in Iraq has, of course, loomed large both in the national consciousness and as a campaign issue. McCain knew that the administration’s early military strategy was not enough to get the job done. And he was among the first to sign on to this year’s troop surge as devised by Gen. David Petraeus.

“John Edwards used to call it ‘the McCain surge.’ He doesn’t anymore,” McCain said. “Al-Qaeda isn’t defeated in Iraq, but it’s on the run.”

But John McCain’s expertise doesn’t begin and end with national security. He is now a firm believer in the power of tax cuts as a driver of the economy. He saw the Bush tax cuts work and vows to make them permanent. He also supports an end to the alternative minimum tax, which has managed to snare far too many middle class families in its unindexed grip. This week the Congress moved to increase the exemption for the middle class, but that’s merely a one-year fix.

McCain’s name, of course, is also synonymous with immigration reform - the kind of real reform that will both safeguard our borders and provide a path to citizenship - not amnesty - for the 12 million illegal aliens who now live among us. The senator freely acknowledges that his support for immigration reform threatened to jettison his presidential candidacy.

“What we miscalculated was the total mistrust in government,” McCain told the Herald. “They didn’t believe we could secure the borders.” But this isn’t 1986. The technology has changed. But more than that, it takes commitment. A McCain administration would have that commitment.

On immigration reform, on tax reform, on campaign reform McCain has proven time and time again that he has the ability to reach across that increasingly wide partisan divide and make things happen.

This week Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.), who was himself on the Democratic presidential ticket in 2000, took the unprecedented step of endorsing McCain in the upcoming Republican primaries. He did so with these words:

“In this critical election, no one should let party lines be a barrier to choosing the person we believe is best qualified to lead our nation forward. The problems that confront us are too great, the threats we face too real, and the opportunities we have too exciting for us to play partisan politics with the presidency.”

The Boston Herald agrees. And so this newspaper too will break with its decades-old tradition of endorsing candidates in both the Republican and Democratic primaries. In doing so we also address our words particularly to those millions of independent voters here, in New Hampshire and around the nation who can choose to cast their ballot in either party primary.

The choice this year is indeed clear. John McCain should be the next president of the United States and the Boston Herald is proud to endorse his candidacy.


TOPICS: Editorial; Politics/Elections; US: Massachusetts; US: New Hampshire
KEYWORDS: 2008; 2008endorsements; endorsement; mccain
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-94 next last
To: Norman Bates

No, but didn’t the Globe already endorse him as the GOP candidate?

Thats kind of like me endorsing Edwards or Bloomberg. LOL.


21 posted on 12/20/2007 6:51:50 PM PST by bill1952 (The right to buy weapons is the right to be free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis
Does anyone have any delusions about any GOP candidate winning Mass?
22 posted on 12/20/2007 6:53:49 PM PST by bill1952 (The right to buy weapons is the right to be free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: bill1952

Yes, the Globe did endorse him. But this is a seperate endorsement.


23 posted on 12/20/2007 6:54:07 PM PST by Norman Bates
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: bill1952

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1932892/posts


24 posted on 12/20/2007 6:55:04 PM PST by Norman Bates
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Norman Bates

McCain is the one because he will bow at the alter of the liberal media.


25 posted on 12/20/2007 6:55:22 PM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Norman Bates

Maybe because they know Joe Isuzu Romney is a lying sack of $hit.


26 posted on 12/20/2007 6:55:26 PM PST by fieldmarshaldj (~~~Jihad Fever -- Catch It !~~~ (Backup tag: "Live Fred or Die"))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Norman Bates
“What we miscalculated was the total mistrust in government,” McCain told the Herald. “They didn’t believe we could secure the borders.” But this isn’t 1986.

Yeah, it's 2007, 6 years after 9-11, during a "war on terror" and WE STILL DON'T HAVE SECURE BORDERS!!

27 posted on 12/20/2007 6:56:14 PM PST by DTogo (I haven't left the GOP, the GOP left me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

Ok, LOL, I would put it more like they are familiar with his different stances but ok... ;^)


28 posted on 12/20/2007 6:56:47 PM PST by Norman Bates
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: bill1952

Ronald Reagan won.


29 posted on 12/20/2007 6:57:10 PM PST by Diogenesis (Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Norman Bates
McCain’s name, of course, is also synonymous with immigration reform - the kind of real reform that will both safeguard our borders and provide a path to citizenship - not [just] amnesty - for the 12 million illegal aliens who now live among us. The senator freely acknowledges that his support for immigration reform threatened to jettison his presidential candidacy.

Liberals, in their mind, have just an embarrassment of riches. They not only control the Democrat party but have four liberals vying for the Republican nomination: McCain, Romney, Giuliani, and Huckabee.

30 posted on 12/20/2007 6:57:14 PM PST by iowamark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis

Sure did. But you didn’t answer the question.


31 posted on 12/20/2007 6:58:56 PM PST by bill1952 (The right to buy weapons is the right to be free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis; bill1952

Yes he did. See post 24. A 2006 poll had McCain beating Hillary in Massachusetts like 49-40. He’s also beaten Obama in Mass. in five consecutive polls.


32 posted on 12/20/2007 7:00:00 PM PST by Norman Bates
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Cinnamon Girl

Isn’t it funny how the mojo has passed along?

First it was Guiliani, then Romney, then Thompson, then Huckabee, and now McCain. I guess in a couple weeks it will come full circle back around to Guiliani again.


33 posted on 12/20/2007 7:02:05 PM PST by joseph20 (...to ourselves and our Posterity...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Parley Baer
This is the Herald’s Republican primary endorsement. I think they may endorse Huckabee for the Democrat primary.
34 posted on 12/20/2007 7:02:45 PM PST by Brad from Tennessee ("A politician can't give you anything he hasn't first stolen from you.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Norman Bates

For someone who has trampled all over the 1st amendment, how can any media outlet endorse him?


35 posted on 12/20/2007 7:03:11 PM PST by Ron in Acreage (Thinking of new tagline)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee

No Democrat is being endorsed. It’s McCain for President.


36 posted on 12/20/2007 7:04:32 PM PST by Norman Bates
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: bill1952
Yeah. The Globe endorsed McCain and Obama. The Globe is owned by the New York Times. The Herald is owned by Newscorp.
37 posted on 12/20/2007 7:05:16 PM PST by Brad from Tennessee ("A politician can't give you anything he hasn't first stolen from you.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Norman Bates
>>Choice is clear: McCain’s the one (Boston Herald endorses McCain)<<

Boston has never big on free speech....

Banned in Boston
38 posted on 12/20/2007 7:07:21 PM PST by gondramB (Preach the Gospel at all times, and when necessary, use words.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Norman Bates
That was a joke. But it makes sense because the Herald leans to the right of the Globe and nobody would pay much attention to their Democrat endorsement. I know in the past they have made endorsements for both tickets. In 1988, when I lived in Massachusetts briefly, the Herald endorsed Bush and Dukakis in the state primary.
39 posted on 12/20/2007 7:12:22 PM PST by Brad from Tennessee ("A politician can't give you anything he hasn't first stolen from you.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Norman Bates

Aye.


40 posted on 12/20/2007 7:15:15 PM PST by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-94 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson