Apparently the Herald is not endorsing any Democrat for their primary and is instead choosing to endorse John McCain fully for President.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
To: TitansAFC; meandog; therut; Laissez-faire capitalist; MARTIAL MONK; napscoordinator; sportutegrl; ..
The McCain List.
Common sense conservatism
To: Clintonfatigued; fieldmarshaldj; Kuksool; Reagan79; AirForceGeorge
To: Norman Bates
Don’t tell me the MSM is giving up on Huckabee. Looks like they are switching back to McQueeg.
To: Norman Bates
It’s more humorous they’re not endorsing Joe Isuzu Romney.
5 posted on
12/20/2007 6:43:04 PM PST by
fieldmarshaldj
(~~~Jihad Fever -- Catch It !~~~ (Backup tag: "Live Fred or Die"))
To: Norman Bates
6 posted on
12/20/2007 6:43:09 PM PST by
mdittmar
(May God watch over those who serve,and have served,to keep us free)
To: Norman Bates
McCain definitely has the mojo. I don’t know how I feel about that, but that’s what seems to be going on right now.
7 posted on
12/20/2007 6:44:30 PM PST by
Cinnamon Girl
(OMGIIHIHOIIC ping list)
To: Norman Bates
The senator freely acknowledges that his support for immigration reform threatened to jettison his presidential candidacy. Threatened? - Its dead Jim.
The Boston Herald endorsement is the vampire's kiss.
8 posted on
12/20/2007 6:44:48 PM PST by
bill1952
(The right to buy weapons is the right to be free)
To: Norman Bates
People still care who newspapers endorse?
To: Norman Bates
McCain is the only candidate who could be confused with being a ‘rat.
15 posted on
12/20/2007 6:49:58 PM PST by
Paladin2
(Huma for co-president!)
To: Norman Bates; neverdem
So, why is the Herold (Hearold?) calling for McCain since “The times are so troubling...”
He (and Dean and Mrs Clinton on the demo side) are the unstable, emotional, ranting and screaming tyrants.
Could it be that McCain is such an easy target to destroy after his nomination? Or that, since McCain has laid down with the democrats so often on so many issues that they think he can be easily manipulated by his adoring fans in the mainstream press corpse if elected that the democrats will still be effectively in charge?
16 posted on
12/20/2007 6:50:02 PM PST by
Robert A Cook PE
(I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
To: Norman Bates
Give me a break. Just more MSM antics trying to split the vote and get a brokered convention and a weak candidate.
Wake up GOP. You’re being played.
17 posted on
12/20/2007 6:51:14 PM PST by
Free Vulcan
(Friends don't let friends vote Huckabee)
To: Norman Bates
There are times in this nations history so perilous that they cry out for a steady, experienced leader, a person so trusted that we would put the fate of this country in his hands. This is one of those times, and Sen. John McCain is that person. What are these guy on drugs?
18 posted on
12/20/2007 6:51:32 PM PST by
NurdlyPeon
(Thompson / Hunter in 2008)
To: Norman Bates
McCain is the one because he will bow at the alter of the liberal media.
To: Norman Bates
What we miscalculated was the total mistrust in government, McCain told the Herald. They didnt believe we could secure the borders. But this isnt 1986.Yeah, it's 2007, 6 years after 9-11, during a "war on terror" and WE STILL DON'T HAVE SECURE BORDERS!!
27 posted on
12/20/2007 6:56:14 PM PST by
DTogo
(I haven't left the GOP, the GOP left me.)
To: Norman Bates
McCains name, of course, is also synonymous with immigration reform - the kind of real reform that will both safeguard our borders and provide a path to citizenship - not [just] amnesty - for the 12 million illegal aliens who now live among us. The senator freely acknowledges that his support for immigration reform threatened to jettison his presidential candidacy. Liberals, in their mind, have just an embarrassment of riches. They not only control the Democrat party but have four liberals vying for the Republican nomination: McCain, Romney, Giuliani, and Huckabee.
30 posted on
12/20/2007 6:57:14 PM PST by
iowamark
To: Norman Bates
For someone who has trampled all over the 1st amendment, how can any media outlet endorse him?
35 posted on
12/20/2007 7:03:11 PM PST by
Ron in Acreage
(Thinking of new tagline)
To: Norman Bates
>>Choice is clear: McCains the one (Boston Herald endorses McCain)<<
Boston has never big on free speech....
Banned in Boston
38 posted on
12/20/2007 7:07:21 PM PST by
gondramB
(Preach the Gospel at all times, and when necessary, use words.)
To: Norman Bates
McCAIN!!!
Well, after thinking a bit, I guess, unless he explodes/implodes (ominiplodes?) again, I'd place him third on my list, after Thompson and Hunter.
42 posted on
12/20/2007 7:23:08 PM PST by
Rudder
To: Norman Bates
Just curious...am I the only voter who is upset by the pathetic choices this current electoral cycle has produced? Is this candidate list the best this country has to offer? I don’t think so or I at least I hope not.
43 posted on
12/20/2007 7:31:04 PM PST by
mort56
To: Norman Bates
The Boston Globe and Boston Herald has had a hate/hate relationship with Gov Romney for a long time. There were many contentious press conferences with Romney’s spokespeople and snarly commentaries from the Boston TV political pundits.
Based on some past articles, I really thought they were going to endorse Rudy.
46 posted on
12/20/2007 7:45:22 PM PST by
hydrotech1
(I have but one lamp by which my feet are guided; and that is the lamp of experience)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson