The dogs are nipping at the heels of the camels but the caravan moves on.
To: Abbeville Conservative; asparagus; Austin1; bcbuster; bethtopaz; BlueAngel; Bluestateredman; ...
2 posted on
12/22/2007 6:25:25 AM PST by
Reaganesque
(Charter Member of the Romney FR Resistance)
To: Reaganesque
Romney would win the woman vote by a large margin against Hillary.
Given the chance to vote for a bitchy woman or a dashingly handsome man, women will go for the man every time.
My father says this is one more reason why women should not be allowed to vote (:~)
3 posted on
12/22/2007 6:28:05 AM PST by
elizabetty
("Nothing great was ever achieved without enthusiasm." .Ralph Waldo Emerson)
To: Reaganesque
Romney’s holding up well going into the home stretch. He has the resources to make a final sprint. It will be interesting to see if Rush Limbaugh’s Friday commentary peels off a few percent of Huckabee’s support.
4 posted on
12/22/2007 6:29:47 AM PST by
JCEccles
To: Reaganesque
As negative information comes out for Guiliani and Huckabee, I expect the primary get get down to Fred vs Romney.
May the best man win.
6 posted on
12/22/2007 6:33:09 AM PST by
Forgiven_Sinner
(The most incomprehensible thing about the universe is that it is at all comprehensible.)
To: Reaganesque
7 posted on
12/22/2007 6:33:42 AM PST by
mewzilla
(In politics the middle way is none at all. John Adams)
To: Reaganesque
Clinton, Romney, Guiliani...a toss up. All three have fruity liberal positions in their records. This is what you get when you run RINOs. Hopefully the pubbies will wake up and nominate a conservative candidate to demonstrate a distinct difference between them and the Demoncrats. Once that happens the former first co-dependent will lose big.Let's re-establish conservatism as the core value of the Republican Party and turn back this wave of "blue-blood Republicanism" espoused by the liberal troika of Romney, Guiliani and McCain.
9 posted on
12/22/2007 6:37:14 AM PST by
big'ol_freeper
("Those who hammer their guns into plows will plow for those who do not." ~ Thomas Jefferson)
To: Reaganesque
This is why the DNC has been going after Mitt more than any other candidate.
From the Wall Street Journal:
Democrats know it. Here's an interesting statistic: Since the beginning of 2007, the Democratic National Committee has released
102 direct attacks on Mitt Romney.
Rudy Giuliani has warranted 78;
John McCain 68;
Fred Thompson 21.
Mike Huckabee? Four.
The most recent of these landed back in March. GOP voters may not have examined Mr. Huckabee's record, but the left has--and they love what they see.
26 posted on
12/22/2007 7:04:33 AM PST by
elizabetty
("Nothing great was ever achieved without enthusiasm." .Ralph Waldo Emerson)
To: Reaganesque
The numbers appear about right. Both parties candidates are polling in the low to middle 40’s.The undecideds won’t make up their minds until late October of 2008. Wake me then. Right now this all a bunch of BS.
34 posted on
12/22/2007 7:36:59 AM PST by
shaft29
To: Reaganesque
Rush pounds Huckabee. Ann Coulter pounds Huckabee. Pretty soon the voters will pound Huckabee.
Mitt Romney is so obviously the best choice for President out of this field or any currently possible field; the Democrats tremble with fear that Mitt Romney will be the Republican candidate.
46 posted on
12/22/2007 9:08:46 AM PST by
claudiustg
(You know it. I know it.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson