Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Blair sparks 'holy row'
Independent ^ | December 24, 2007 | Tony Jones and Daniel Bentley

Posted on 12/24/2007 5:48:49 AM PST by NYer

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last
To: NYer

The Blair Switch Project


21 posted on 12/24/2007 8:24:51 AM PST by Edgar3 (Steve Spurrier for President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Edgar3
The Blair Switch Project

Ha, ha!

22 posted on 12/24/2007 8:28:30 AM PST by Brujo (Quod volunt, credunt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: defconw

Yep, only God knows the heart. But, it seems to me that those whose religion he is deigning to join deserve to know the mind.


23 posted on 12/24/2007 8:48:00 AM PST by lapster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: lapster

I don’t think it’s anyone’s business. We all fall short and most of us know it.


24 posted on 12/24/2007 8:51:49 AM PST by defconw (Pray for Snow!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Brujo

It’s not a “conversion” to move from one church to another. It’s a “conversion” when you move from one lord to another Lord.


25 posted on 12/24/2007 10:21:25 AM PST by Theo (Global warming "scientists." Pro-evolution "scientists." They're both wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: basil

Yes, you did. You wrote, “Welcome to the Church.” Blair was already a member of a Christian church, the Church of England. He’s changed denominations, perhaps becoming more serious about his faith, but he’s not just coming into Christ’s Church. He did that when he first placed faith in Christ.

Again, let’s rejoice that Mr. Blair is apparently becoming more serious about his faith. Let’s not make it a matter of whether the leadership of his church is in Rome or some other country. We can do without that my-church-is-better-than-your-church attitude here.


26 posted on 12/24/2007 10:25:25 AM PST by Theo (Global warming "scientists." Pro-evolution "scientists." They're both wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Theo

Geeze—guess I should have said Welcome to the Catholic Church. There—now are you satisfied?


27 posted on 12/24/2007 10:27:40 AM PST by basil (Support the Second Amendment--buy another gun today!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: NYer

People can change if they want to. I cringe when I think about some of the things I said and did before I converted to Christianity. For most folks it’s not some Charlton-Heston-seeing-the-burning-bush change, but a gradual thing.

You also have to ask: would it be more likely that Tony Blair would change his views within or outside of the church?


28 posted on 12/24/2007 11:59:36 AM PST by RKBA Democrat (Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on me, a sinner!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Russ

I don’t know, has Kerry, Durbin, Pelosi, Biden...


29 posted on 12/25/2007 6:04:44 AM PST by AliVeritas (ah, the sheer grace! in darkness and concealment, my house being now all stilled.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: RKBA Democrat

It is known that the Pope had a long and serious talk with Blair about all these issues (his apparent disagreement with Catholic teachings on life issues) last summer before Blair was received. I’m sure he was told to think about these things seriously, and obviously, he has.

I think even Cormac Murphy O’Connor, while a raving liberal on just about everything, has emerged with some pro-life statements, so perhaps Blair actually did receive some formation in this direction. And, as you say, he has a better chance of becoming solidly pro-life within the Church than outside of it.

Now if only somebody would call Ol’ Teddy K. in for a talking to...


30 posted on 12/25/2007 6:18:13 AM PST by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: livius

“Now if only somebody would call Ol’ Teddy K. in for a talking to...’

A talking-to only works if the recipient is willing to listen.

Although I disagree with Tony Blair about 80% of the time on politics, he is an intelligent individual who has shown himself willing to use the grey matter that the good Lord gave him. The fact that he has actually come into the church knowing full well what the doctrine says with regard to life gives me some reason to be optimistic.

You never know. We may yet be given reason to roast up that fatted calf.


31 posted on 12/25/2007 6:03:39 PM PST by RKBA Democrat (Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on me, a sinner!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Theo

There is the Church as a organizational legal body and then there is the Church, encompassing all believers regardless of denomination, only God knows the true extent of this Church for sure. I believe that poster was talking about the former rather than the latter.


32 posted on 12/25/2007 6:11:41 PM PST by Xenophon450 (They say it's lonely at the top, then I am as lonely as can be.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Xenophon450

No. As I wrote, “Blair was already a member of a Christian church, the Church of England.” The poster was implying that only those who are part of the Roman church are part of the “real church.”

They’re free to believe what they want. The Roman church is a fine one. I’m part of a non-Roman church, FWIW, which is also a fine one (though anathema, according to some).


33 posted on 12/25/2007 7:28:16 PM PST by Theo (Global warming "scientists." Pro-evolution "scientists." They're both wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Theo
Let’s just be glad that he’s turned his heart toward Christ, all right, and not get into the “my church is better than your church” game.

So are you saying that when Blair was a member of Church of England, his heart wasn't turned toward Christ?

It’s not a “conversion” to move from one church to another. It’s a “conversion” when you move from one lord to another Lord.

Jews, Christians, Muslims all worship the same Lord, so it's not a conversion to move among these faiths?

34 posted on 12/26/2007 7:47:02 AM PST by Brujo (Quod volunt, credunt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Theo
Merry Christmas! I think that the issue of such a high visibility politicial as Mr Blair leaving the Church of England which claims the King or Queen as the head of the Church and moving to the Catholic Church which is a group of 28 churches in communion with the bishop of Rome is quite a significant thing. It is not simply moving from one denomination to another and Mr Balirs previous positions are at odds with church teaching. This is what we call scandal in the Roman Catholic Church.

Others may wish to exclaim that we should all just get along and not worry what various groups and individuals might believe, but that is the way of a "dead dog" as Chesterton would say."A dead dog goes with the flow of the stream of life, a live dog swims against the current." Mr Blair has publicly chosen to swim against the current of popular opinion. I hope he intents to swim strongly and keep up the battle!

35 posted on 12/26/2007 8:56:44 AM PST by RichardMoore (MERRY CHRISTMAS TO ALL! Jesus, I trust in You!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson