“Fred Thompson 3%
Say’s it all.”
Incidentally, his latest poll numbers in Iowa and NH are also 3%.
Fred Thompson 3%
Incidentally, his latest poll numbers in Iowa and NH are also 3%.
WHERE’D YOU COME UP WITH THAT BS? Who gives a rats rearend about NH? All you huckleberry pickers and paulbearers are going to be very surprised by Iowa.
Incidentally, the ARG poll is always a bit off. Rasmussen has his numbers a bit higher, I think around 16%. I hope it’s no higher than that though. If Fred breaks 20-25% in any poll in the next week or so I think he will have issues in Iowa.
I do not believe this for one minute.
What is your strategy? Do you sit and wait for a promising Fred thread, and flame away to try to change the tone to negative? You are a desperate guy dude. Try to build your guy up, rather than instinctively slip into attack mode against a fine conservative. Shame.
Where’s your source for this claim?
I just now saw the thread that got you and JCEccles banned. I can’t believe it. Petronski and the other Fredheads have done nothing but personal attacks and I cannot see that a description of FR as having become “in the tank” (a certain kind of tank, to be sure) for Fred constitutes a personal attack. Having been away from FR all day yesterday, I noticed this morning a relative dearth of anti-Romney threads compared to the past few days. But I had no idea that you guys had been banned.
I’ve slowly been growing disenchanted with FR as a source of analysis from the heartland of news stories. What seems to me growing narrowness of viewpoint is offputting. I’ll find some other source for good analysis. Perhaps Townhall—it has a wide range.
In any case, could you let me know if you get unbanned?
>>Fred Thompson 3%
Says it all.
Incidentally, his latest poll numbers in Iowa and NH are also 3%.<<
Fred’s at 9% in Iowa and fighting with Guiliani for 3rd but they both have the money to continue no matter whether they finish 3rd or fourth.