Posted on 12/26/2007 6:28:25 AM PST by Alouette
“religious hypocrisy and politically correct attitude of the religious social discourse”
I see those who advocate murder for their own convenience attack others to make themselves feel more righteous about their terrible choice.
Certainly mentally ill, if not actually possessed. I am repelled.
It’s as if the word “adoption” doesn’t even exist.
The shedding of innocent blood via Moloch worship is what got the children of Israel into such trouble with the Lord long ago. Yet here is this woman promoting a modern version of it in Israel. Very sad.
Abortion is murder but murder is sometimes beneficial when there are social advantages to it and should be permitted.
“As a mother, had my daughter faced pregnancy at a very young age, I would strongly recommend that she terminate it rather than punish herself and the child throughout her life because of the mistake she made.”
Change the position of two words:
“As a daughter, had my mother faced pregnancy at a very young age, I would strongly recommend that she terminate it rather than punish herself and the child throughout her life because of the mistake she made.”
Dilemma solved!!
True, but it times such as those, it helps to be in the majority.
When is killing the innocent a social advantage?
What if congress passed a law prohibiting physicians from charging for abortions. Rather than making abortions illegal, making it illegal for physicians to charge for the abortions?
I bet that we would see a huge decline in the number of abortions that would be performed.
Why? Because the abortion-minded woman is saying, "There is not one other woman on earth that I would trust to adopt my baby. I would rather kill my baby outright, than place him in the arms of another woman who would love him."
It's a repudiation of everything that as ever said by women about "sisterhood," "women united will never be defeated," "solidarity" and all those fine words used by religious women and feminists alike. It's saying, "I would rather reduce my baby to a bloody mound of torn flesh, then let another woman delight in him and treasure him." It's turning thumbs-down on every woman in your life--- your own grandma, mother, aunts, sisters, cousins, sister-in-laws, schoolmates, friends --- and every kind-faced stranger on the street, saying, "No one else can raise my son (or daughter.) I'll kill him first."
A truly desperate woman could at least wait through the pregnancy, give birth, and then leave her newborn in a church or synagogue or a hospital so he could be adopted by someone else. That's the rock-bottom least she could do.
But "No, I'll crush him instead. I'll rub him out." It's treason to womankind --- and to the whole human race.
Only people who can guarantee that their child's life will be completely free of distress of one type or another should contemplate having a child.
If people held to this standard, the World population would be about twelve.
L
NOT WITH INNOCENT LITTLE ONES..HOW CAN THIS BASIC
AFFRONT TO OUR GOD BVEN BEPERMITTED, AND IGNORED BY THE
LAWS OF NATURF...THE HELL WITH THE SUPREME COURT IDIOTS,
AND DUTIFUL (?) POLITICIANS WHO SANCTION MURDER !! JK
I am mocking the author of the original post. It is an attitude that is actually normal on the left who advocate that it is good to kill some people for the benefit of more deserving people or for “society.” I have to remember that many people here are totally mystified by any sort of subtlety or sarcasm.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.