Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Ron Paul Revolution: A New Low in Foolhardy Fear-Mongering
NewsByUs ^ | 12-26-07 | JB Williams

Posted on 12/26/2007 10:44:41 AM PST by SJackson

Champion of prostitutes, drug dealers, white supremacists and anti-war activists like MoveOn.org, Code Pink, libertarian Lew Rockwell and girl friend Cindy Sheehan, Ron Paul is raising money from outside of the Republican Party and counting on one day party-jumpers to secure the Republican nomination.

In terms of fund-raising, Paul really is setting campaign records. He has also set new records for working outside of a political party to upset the party he claims his rightful home and is well on his way to setting a new low standard for foolhardy fear-mongering.

His campaign supporters fear their fellow Americans more than Bin Laden. They hate the Bush administration more than Marxists across the aisle. They fear all forms of interaction with the world and believe that the spread of democracy around the globe is not only some form of torture against foreign peoples, but also some new fangled fascism at home.

A Revolution of Americas most Angry

The Ron Paul campaign seems to have harnessed the anger among many Americans. In many cases, the anger itself is quite justified, and shared by many real conservatives.

Republicans in Washington have indeed forgotten that they represent the majority of Americans who are certainly far more conservative than any newsroom anchor would ever let on. They have spent tax-payer funds like a drunken Kennedy at a Martha’s Vineyard lawn party. They have increased the social spending that is bankrupting the Nanny State at a pace that makes Bill Clinton (but not Hillary) look like a fiscal conservative.

They have bought into the open society - open borders nonsense of the liberal left and sit silent as Democrats demand civil rights for terrorists and social aid for illegal aliens, all while the judicial branch steadily legislates away individual liberty and private property rights. Americans have plenty to be angry about.

But is Ron Paul the solution?

Appearing on Tim Russert’s Meet the Press on December 23rd, Ron Paul looked like a deer in headlights as Russert backed Paul into a corner on issue after issue, policy statement after policy statement, until by the end, Ron Paul had publicly denounced almost every policy statement he has ever made.

Paul supporters claim to believe that Paul will shrink the size of the federal government by ending trillions in military, intelligence and foreign aid spending, the day he’s elected. Yet when questioned by Russert about the specifics of such a bold plan, Paul had no specifics about how such a plan could ever actually be implemented. He didn’t even know how many troops would have to be recalled from around the world. Russert had to tell him.

He has repeatedly stated that he wants to abolish the Department of Education, the FBI, the IRS and the Income Tax, as well as countless other federal agencies and programs. Not a bad idea. Yet again when questioned by Russert about the specifics, he either had no specifics, was wrong on his specifics, or accused Russert of being “confused” and denied that he ever made such statements.

Russert even cornered Dr. No on the very real fact that he has “ear-marked” millions for his own Texas district over the years, while railing against ear-marks and stating that the fed shouldn’t even provide disaster relief to American victims of inescapable natural catastrophes.

In short, Ron Paul is far better at rhetoric than reality. Watch Paul make a fool of himself on Meet the Press… (4 separate video segments, watch them all)

The most UN-popular candidate in America

In the most recent Rasmussen Poll taken after the Iowa debates, Ron Paul was the most unpopular declared candidate in America today.

Only 10 percent of likely voters (regardless of party affiliation) stated that they would “definitely consider voting for Ron Paul.” 48 percent said that they “definitely would NEVER consider voting for Ron Paul.”

Even Hillary Clinton, the most disliked and distrusted female in America, polled better with 30 percent FOR and 47 percent AGAINST.

McCain, Thompson and Huckabee are the most universally popular Republican candidates, statistically tied at about 21 percent FOR and 34 percent AGAINST. Only Barack Obama scored better.

Romney and Giuliani both have more than 42 percent definitely AGAINST.

Clearly, Americans are not happy with any of their choices. Barack Obama scored best, but even he had only 29 percent FOR with 36 percent AGAINST.

Paul’s Foolhardy Fear-Mongering

The entire Paul campaign is built upon making voters fear our own government more than outside threats around the globe. Paul has stated that 9/11 was Americas fault on many occasions and that Bush has wrongly used that event to grow the size and reach of government. Something had to happen if the next 9/11 was going to be averted.

Paul’s doom and gloom message resonates with some of Americas best known cowards, anti-Semites, isolationists and anarchists. But it doesn’t seem to resonate with anyone else.

Republican voters are rejecting Paul in mass. Many of the Independents and Democrats that the Paul campaign is begging to “become a Republican for a day” in order to hijack the RNC nomination with voters usually at odds with all Republican ideals, are also rejecting Paul’s fear and smear campaign.

A few anti-war activists are on-board the Paul campaign for obvious reasons. MoveOn.org is scheduling member “meet-ups” at Ron Paul stops and has apparently funded and produced some Paul campaign ads. Even socialist Democrat Dennis Kucinich is looking at endorsing Ron Paul.

But when I went to see how this campaign strategy was playing out on known Democrat blogs, Paul supporters were once again resorting to calling Paul opponents “Nazis” for not lining up behind the man who has some sort of Jim Jones grip on his supporters.

The Money behind the Man

Paul is gladly accepting campaign support from white supremacist groups like Storm Front, brothels in Nevada, anti-war Democrats and anarchists. He will likely outpace all other candidates in 4th quarter fund raising. But where is that money coming from and can it ever translate into votes within the Republican primary process?

Paul supporters believe that their man will win the party nomination against all odds and all polling data. But Paul, who had been denying any thought of running on a third party ticket, refused to rule out that possibility with Russert. A third party runs becomes more possible as the money comes in, but fails to translate into primary votes.

The problem with their strategy

Even new media Paul minion Lew Rockwell writes to Democrats - “I’m a Ron Paul supporter, and I contend that even if you are a devoted adherent of the Democratic Party, your best strategy is to vote for Ron Paul in the primary. - You can still vote for Obama come fall, and rest assured that the Republican machine will be supporting the Democratic candidate, since they dislike Ron Paul much more than any Democrat.” Is this not an outright effort to elect a Democrat rather than a Republican?

The campaign is supported by a very small fragmented base, spread all across the ideological electoral map, people usually working against each other in elections. They are united only by Paul’s anti-war rhetoric. However, getting Nanny State lefties to vote for Paul on the basis of his anti-war rhetoric, while he also promises to wipe out all Nanny State programs is more than unlikely. It’s all but impossible…

Time for Paul to leave the RNC Race

If he runs third party where he really belongs, I believe he will take more votes from the pro-war Democrats than he will ever get from mainstream Republicans. Since he is fully at odds with most Republicans, openly attacking everyone from Lincoln to Reagan and doing so on money raised from liberals, he has no business running for the Republican nomination. It’s time for him to go!

If he lacks the moral courage to leave on his own, the Republican Party should help him leave.

Right to be Angry – Wrong to be Paul

True conservatives should be angry that too many Republicans have lost touch with their conservative values and conservative voters. They should reject RINO candidates and seek a true conservative to unite behind. They should be doing something to change reality and they are - they drafted their own candidate and it isn’t Ron Paul.

But the few who think Ron Paul is more conservative than Lincoln or Reagan are fooling themselves. Thankfully, they don’t seem to be fooling anyone else!

I’m not a Russert fan, but this time, he really did expose the Paul campaign as nothing more than rhetoric. Paul panders to a certain type of individual using fear wrapped in the flag. One can hope that his supporters will begin to look beyond the rhetoric. We’d like to have their energy behind a real conservative candidate.


TOPICS: Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: ronpaul
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

1 posted on 12/26/2007 10:44:42 AM PST by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SJackson
Posted at the request of a Paul supporter.

IMO essentially accurate, though it simply restates what's been said on FR for months.

2 posted on 12/26/2007 10:46:36 AM PST by SJackson (America...thru dissent and protest lost the ability to mobilize a will to win, Col Bui Tin, PAVN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

Here you go, feel free to point out the factual inaccuracies. If unable, just whine away.


3 posted on 12/26/2007 10:47:23 AM PST by SJackson (America...thru dissent and protest lost the ability to mobilize a will to win, Col Bui Tin, PAVN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Oh, I’m sure they will—en masse.


4 posted on 12/26/2007 10:52:26 AM PST by OCCASparky (Steely-Eyed Killer of the Deep)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SJackson; All
FRED THOMPSON IS THE SOLUTION!!

Fred08 - Contribute Now

5 posted on 12/26/2007 10:54:19 AM PST by 2ndDivisionVet (Your "dirt" on Fred is about as persuasive as a Nancy Pelosi Veteran's Day Speech)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Sorry I missed the Russert interview.

Article’s analysis is spot on.


6 posted on 12/26/2007 10:57:07 AM PST by sauropod (Welcome to O'Malleyland. What's in your wallet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #7 Removed by Moderator

To: JackRyanCIA
Jack, the problem with Ron is not that 70 percent of which you agree with, nor the 30 percent which you find him unsuitable. It's his complete and total inability to ground himself in reality to explain HOW he'd accomplish that with which you agree.

The mark of a true loser is a person who, when pressed for specifics, just shrugs his shoulders and hopes you won't notice. That description fits Paul to a "T".

His ideas SOUND good and appeal to those angry with the government, but people aren't looking past their anger to understand what's underneath isn't even smoke and mirrors--it's a totally empty vacuum.
8 posted on 12/26/2007 11:02:36 AM PST by OCCASparky (Steely-Eyed Killer of the Deep)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
Wow, excellent post. 'Hard to see anything wrong with this.

I would like to see specifics of where Paul has attacked President Reagan. Paul used to tout President Reagan's kind words about Paul written when Reagan was president and Paul was a mainstream conservative Republican congressman.

Jesse

9 posted on 12/26/2007 11:07:06 AM PST by Jesse Segovia (Romney '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #10 Removed by Moderator

To: OCCASparky

VERY well said!


11 posted on 12/26/2007 11:07:30 AM PST by PlainOleAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Jesse Segovia

Watch the Meet the Press videos where Paul calls Reagan “a failure.”


12 posted on 12/26/2007 11:08:41 AM PST by PlainOleAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: JackRyanCIA

All true... But that potato head made a fool of Ron Paul in every segment. Actually, all he did was quote Paul and ask him to explain, which Paul was unable to do. He also clearly had facts at hand that Paul should have at hand and doesn’t.

End analysis = Paul is full of hot air! And, Russert is still a liberal potato head...


13 posted on 12/26/2007 11:10:55 AM PST by PlainOleAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Comment #14 Removed by Moderator

To: JackRyanCIA

So why did Hillary’s supporters want him “executed”?


15 posted on 12/26/2007 11:13:51 AM PST by OCCASparky (Steely-Eyed Killer of the Deep)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Comment #16 Removed by Moderator

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Hopefully he generates some electoral support as the primaries approach.


17 posted on 12/26/2007 11:20:48 AM PST by SJackson (America...thru dissent and protest lost the ability to mobilize a will to win, Col Bui Tin, PAVN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Comment #18 Removed by Moderator

To: OCCASparky

Cause he’s the real Democrat in this race...


19 posted on 12/26/2007 11:25:42 AM PST by PlainOleAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: JackRyanCIA
I have yet to hear a single “sound” RP position. I have heard some temping rhetoric. But to be a “sound position,” there must be an element of reality involved, as well as a workable plan of implementation. He has neither, on any issue position I have heard?

How hard is it to attack the IRS, the most hated of all government agencies? Attack it, sure. But get rid of it? How?

Last I knew, Paul did not have a single fan among his congressional buddies, except maybe socialist Kucinich. It’s as if Paul supporters think a president can wave a magic wand or something. Where’s the reality and the plan? He knows neither, best I can tell.

20 posted on 12/26/2007 11:29:59 AM PST by PlainOleAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson