[unspun]

Please tell us how your candidate will trump Roe vs. Wade and outlaw abortion in all 50 states. We’re all ears...

I haven't decided upon a candidate, yet.

It is not just a matter of what is achievable in the next eight years. It is a matter of judging whether or not a candidate has the appropriate commitment and sense of priority.

You can't get a tax break if you have been aborted.

You can't have a thoroughly, politically sacred building block of our whole society in America, if the fallacious travesty of homosexual "marriage" exists in America.

[2ndDivisionVet]

Well, since Fred Thompson is, by far, the most conservative of the truly electable candidates, you’re between a rock and a hard place, IMO.

[budwiesest]

I haven't decided upon a candidate, yet.

This election isn't about abortion and you know it. It's about whether the crushing heel of government will rest on the necks of every American in the form of HillaryCare and every other form of socialism nationalized accordingly.

Ridding ourselves of the biggest threat to individual liberties to come along since Abe F'n Lincoln and Franklin F'n Roosevelt is what's at stake.

Save a Fetus, save a Whale, won't matter much if one's life is spent in servitude. At this point, it's the individual and his/her freedoms against the state. We lose this round, and you'll have the state cracking whips that'll make Roe v Wade pale.

[Prophet in the wilderness]

" You can't get a tax break if you have been aborted."
" You can't have a thoroughly, politically sacred building block of our whole society in America, if the fallacious travesty of homosexual "marriage" exists in America.

I do not argue with your passion on how to end this abomination in our country, what most Fred Thompson supporters are trying to say is, we need another approach.
We need a President who will not only appoint Strict Constitutional Originalist judges to the Supreme Court, but, in the same vein, judges to the Circuit courts also who will up hold the law, and not make up law, and rule against what the " PEOPLE " voted.
I do trust that Fred WILL appoint Supreme Court Justices to the bench who will not make law on the bench, who will uphold the US constitution as originally visioned.
That is were the major battle is, the Supreme Court.
I would be all for a Amendment For Life, and a Amendment for Marriage, and if it can be done, GREAT, but, it's very very difficult to do.
So we have to take another approach.
The only 2 I trust to appoint judges who would be on our side is : Fred Thompson and Duncan Hunter.
I don't care what the rest say, I just DON'T TRUST THEM.
I don't care what Rudy says and promises that he will appoint strict constitutional originalist judges, he and Mitt are just trying to fool us.

[LadyNavyVet]

“You can’t have a thoroughly, politically sacred building block of our whole society in America, if the fallacious travesty of homosexual “marriage” exists in America.”

You can’t possibly be for Huckabee then, since he has stated that sees a right to sodomy in the Constitution. Talk about the downfall of civilization, if sodomy becomes a protected right.

[Checkers]

“You can’t have a thoroughly, politically sacred building block of our whole society in America, if the fallacious travesty of homosexual “marriage” exists in America.”

Isn’t it spelled “fellatious”?