Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Rick.Donaldson

Excuse me, but that is what my candidate said about your candidate, so the comment is fair game.

Interesting that you point out that your candidate “is as well qualified as Hunter having been a Senator longer” doesn’t make any sense, because Hunter isn’t a senator, so it shows you don’t know what you’re talking about.

Note that as names pop up for National Security and SecDef, Hunter is on the short list but Thompson usually isn’t. Hunter is the better candidate when it comes to national security.


10 posted on 12/28/2007 12:26:43 PM PST by Kevmo (We should withdraw from Iraq — via Tehran. And Duncan Hunter is just the man to get that job done.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: Kevmo
Interesting that you point out that your candidate “is as well qualified as Hunter having been a Senator longer” doesn’t make any sense, because Hunter isn’t a senator, so it shows you don’t know what you’re talking about.

Makes PERFECT SENSE. He was a CONGRESSMAN. And a Senator is obviously more qualified than a Congressman anytime. Ask Hillary :) (And I do know what I'm talking about, you just can't read and see the jokes. Sorry you're blind too.)

Just so you know, I'd be very happy with Hunter as President, IF he gets the nomination, but since he won't, I really think he is VERY HIGHLY qualified to be Thompson's Vice President. I've already put in a good word for him with Fred.

Go Fred.
12 posted on 12/28/2007 12:32:07 PM PST by Rick.Donaldson (http://www.transasianaxis.com - Visit for lastest on DPRK/Russia/China/Etc --Fred Thompson for Prez.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson