There was a post on FR last night where one of the people who prepared Bhutto’s body said that there was a definite bullet wound.
The still pictures I’ve seen seem to back up that it was an assassination instead of Bhutto dying og a fractures skull.
I meant to say “...dying of a fractured skull.”
Bomb or bullet, it is still an assisination. The skull impact (if it was cause of death) was a result of the blast, not ducking 18 inches into the car.
You said — “The still pictures I’ve seen seem to back up that it was an assassination instead of Bhutto dying og a fractures skull.”
Well, you know it’s possible to be shot and live, and it’s possible to die of something else, other than a bullet wound. Therefore, if the government has the information from the doctors who say that it’s the fractured skull which is the immediate cause of death, I don’t see a problem with that. Remember, it’s the blast (also from the shooter) which is said to have propelled her head forcefully against the handle which then fractured her skull. It’s the same person who caused the death, but not by a bullet wound.
Regards,
Star Traveler