1 posted on
12/30/2007 11:29:56 AM PST by
Lorianne
To: Lorianne
2 posted on
12/30/2007 11:39:34 AM PST by
goodnesswins
(Being Challenged Builds Character! Being Coddled Destroys Character!)
To: Lorianne
and in Wash. state, you can buy a hundred acres and will be allowed to only use 10 = the remaining 90% of your land must remain pristine... These Draconian land use laws will continue, if allowed to, until your land belongs to the "Crown" like in the UK - you only own the house on it.
It's time for a full blown tea-party. I've got feathers for the headdresses...
3 posted on
12/30/2007 11:40:57 AM PST by
maine-iac7
(",,,but you can't fool all of the people all the time" LINCOLN)
To: Lorianne
I still believe the origin of the land use law in Oregon (SB100) violated OR Bill of Rights, Section 18 and US Bill of Rights, 5th Amendment. Trouble is, it would cost a MegaBucks to run it through the judicial process and the State knows it. However, some day the right person may just get PO’ed enough to do it.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson