Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Low-Key Thompson Stumbles Toward Finish Line
ABC ^ | 1/2/08 | Rick Klein

Posted on 01/02/2008 9:00:41 AM PST by pissant

Two days before the Iowa caucuses — day 15 of his 17-day "hands down" bus tour — former senator Fred Thompson's campaign bus stood motionless in the snowy parking lot of a West Des Moines motel, across from a movie theater and a suburban strip mall.

Thompson's campaign scheduled only one event for New Year's Day, a meet-and-greet at the Iowa Veterans Home in Marshalltown, about an hour outside Des Moines. Thompson, R-Tenn., shunned the bus, emblazoned with his picture, for the relative comfort of a black Chevrolet Suburban.

(snip)

Thompson has staked his campaign's prospects to Iowa. In seeking to jump-start his campaign last month, he promised to crisscross the Hawkeye State with visits to 50 cities and towns in 17 days aboard his new campaign bus.

(Excerpt) Read more at abcnews.go.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: abcnews; fred; fredthompson; ia2008; over; projournalism; rickklein
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280281-290 next last
To: pissant
If Fred pulls it out, he will be one of the few I’d vote for without having to go to confession the next morning. Right now, he is sucking oxygen from Hunter, so he should drop out.

Please help me to understand your logic here:

Fred is in the Double digits, hunter is in the single digits.

When a candidate drops out, not all his support goes where he tells it to. (Tanc endorsed Mitt, but his numbers stayed basically flat)

So why not have Duncan (my #2 guy, he just isn't getting traction) drop out and give what support he can to Fred?

I ask you, if Duncan dropped out tomorrow, who would you support?
241 posted on 01/02/2008 12:10:43 PM PST by DelphiUser ("You can lead a man to knowledge, but you can't make him think")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: tillacum
I wonder why the screaming media tries to run things?

Because they believe they are relevant :)

242 posted on 01/02/2008 12:10:44 PM PST by Gabz (Don't tell my mom I'm a lobbyist, she thinks I'm a piano player in a whorehouse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 234 | View Replies]

To: Gabz

I’m not. I’m just defending myself from the notion that I don’t discuss the candidates records. It is Fred’s record, not his current rhetoric, that makes him a moderate.


243 posted on 01/02/2008 12:11:58 PM PST by pissant (Duncan Hunter: Warrior, Statesman, Conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 238 | View Replies]

To: LS

You’re kidding, right? Giuliani has been getting pimped non-stop by one entire network (Fox) and has been getting mostly softballs from the rest. He has his very own radio shill ( and several shill-ettes) in Hannity ( and the replacements he uses when on vacation). Not to mention all the print media help he’s had all along, because he’s the most liberal of the GOP candidates.Funny that since he’s been cratering in the polls, he’s still on the media radar, even though he’s nearly down to Hunter/Ron Paul numbers.
Giuliani has not been “hit with slime pieces”, he’s had to face up to the life that he’s lived so far. Mitt has had to face up to his past. Is this slime?


244 posted on 01/02/2008 12:14:38 PM PST by Mr Inviso
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies]

To: DelphiUser

Becuase Fred has celebrity and money and name ID and many GOP bigs backing him, yet he is continuing to flounder. And Hunter could certainly use an influx of volunteers.


245 posted on 01/02/2008 12:14:49 PM PST by pissant (Duncan Hunter: Warrior, Statesman, Conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 241 | View Replies]

To: luvadavi
If I thought that had half a chance, I’d go for it. Sadly, it doesn’t IMO. It would simply destroy the Republican effort...

Well, I will say though, that I don’t plan on voting for Giuliani, Romney or Huckabee, so it really doesn’t matter much to me if Thompson or Hunter aren’t the standard bearer when the primaries and caucuses are over. In that case, I could easily go third party.

The Republican party is essentially dead to me. While I wish they could get their act together and support conservative values with fervor, that simply isn’t in the works. That saddens me, but I can’t change it. Alas I can't support it either.

246 posted on 01/02/2008 12:15:52 PM PST by DoughtyOne (< fence >< sound immigration policies >< /weasles >< /RINOs >< /Reagan wannabees that are liberal >)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 236 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Buh-bye. I’m not rehashing all that’s been hashed and hashed and hashed.


247 posted on 01/02/2008 12:18:36 PM PST by Clara Lou (Thompson '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 222 | View Replies]

To: pissant
I think you're confused. The entry of Alan Keyes took most of Hunters supporters.

You know, the ideologically pure windmill tilters.

No one with a chance of winning is good enough for them!
248 posted on 01/02/2008 12:20:01 PM PST by teledude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus

Well, in this context “attack” meant posting a news article that provide a factual statement about Fred’s bus.

So I think that for this thread the term “attack” was meant to apply to facts.

But in fact, Romney doesn’t have a longstanding pro-abortion record. He has a long-standing pro-abortion stance, but he until he was Governor he never had a “record” on the subject, other than his wife giving $150 at a planned parenthood fundraiser in 1994.

Once he became Governor, he had a chance to build an actual record. And while for the first two years, his rhetoric was still pro-abortion, it turns out his actions were pro-life. In fact, Mass. pro-life groups thanked him at the end of his term for his hard work on valuable pro-life legislation.

And most of what is cited as “pro-abortion” actions are actually not actions he took, or were actually not as they are portrayed.

For example, he is attacked for “forcing catholic hospitals to administer the morning-after pill”, and that is used to claim that he supports abortion.

But in fact, he vetoed the legislation making the morning-after pill available. And when the legislature overrode the veto, he still tried to exempt the hospitals by claiming that under a previous law, they were exempt, and hte new law didn’t specifically say it was revoking that exemption.

Unfortunately, the new law HAD contained the exemption, and the legislature had removed it, and the legal advisors researched the issue and told Romney that the law clearly had removed the hospital exemption. So Romney implemented the law as it was written over his veto.

He was opposed to forcing the hospitals to give out the pills, and because he fought hard to protect them before having to give in to the law, some people falsely claim he “flipped” on the issue (counting his enforcement of the law as a change in HIS position).

The story on abortions in the medical plan is similar, although he never vetoed it because not only would it be fruitless given the overwhelming vote, but he wasn’t opposed to the medical insurance including coverage for medically necessary abortions. Romney still supports abortion for rape and incest, if I read him correctly (as does Fred Thompson). If you believe abortion should be legal for rape and incest, you certainly would want medical insurance to cover the procedure.

He opposed the embryonic stem cell research measures, opposed cloning.


249 posted on 01/02/2008 12:22:20 PM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: pissant

You’re confusing me with someone who pays more than a modicum of interest in your personal opinions.

I like Hunter, I don’t particularly care for your means of promoting his candidacy, but guess what? That’s just my opinion. I also don’t particularly care for your means of putting down those who don’t support you candidate of choice, but guess what? That is also just my opinion.

I also don’t particularly care for the way others are promoting other candidates either.

Having mature discussions about the positions being stated by candidates is a great means of sorting the wheat from the chaff. Attacking supporters of other candidates because of their support is totally counter productive to the goal we all seek, which is a conservative candidate.


250 posted on 01/02/2008 12:23:56 PM PST by Gabz (Don't tell my mom I'm a lobbyist, she thinks I'm a piano player in a whorehouse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 237 | View Replies]

To: Robbin

You are probably right from a practical matter, but Thompson already had his moment in the sun, and he didn’t catch on.

If Hunter could get pushed to 10%, he’d get real press coverage, which means a lot of people would hear what he had to say, he’d get more than 2 questions at a debate, he’d be doing Tim Russert, and he’d be the gossip in all the newspapers.

Maybe that wouldn’t help him, but we won’t know because it won’t happen. It COULD have helped him — When Huckabee got past 10%, he got huge coverage which boosted him up another 15 points almost, until people realised he was rather flawed, and now he’s falling.

Imagine if that happened with Duncan, and people found he was NOT flawed.

Sill, it’s really an academic exercise. Fred couldn’t have known where he’d be today, and wouldn’t have supported Hunter, so it’s a moot point.


251 posted on 01/02/2008 12:25:04 PM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
Man, what do we really stand for? This is rather revealing...

Worth repeating.

252 posted on 01/02/2008 12:25:09 PM PST by scripter ("You don't have a soul. You are a soul. You have a body." - C.S. Lewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies]

To: pissant; pogo101
"Low-Key Thompson Stumbles Toward Finish Line".

That's okay, ABC is stumbling towards extinction.

Leni

253 posted on 01/02/2008 12:25:53 PM PST by MinuteGal (Three Cheers for the FRed, White and Blue !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Gabz

I’m not confusing you with anyone. You posted to me, you got a response.


254 posted on 01/02/2008 12:26:58 PM PST by pissant (Duncan Hunter: Warrior, Statesman, Conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 250 | View Replies]

To: Gabz; LS

I saw Thompson on L&O last night... think it was USA or TNT...


255 posted on 01/02/2008 12:26:58 PM PST by scripter ("You don't have a soul. You are a soul. You have a body." - C.S. Lewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 227 | View Replies]

To: Politicalmom

Just gave some more cashola to Fred!!! Thanks for the Ping


256 posted on 01/02/2008 12:28:47 PM PST by cmsgop ( MURTHA: 'I think the 'surge' is working'...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: MinuteGal

Exactly!


257 posted on 01/02/2008 12:28:53 PM PST by DoughtyOne (< fence >< sound immigration policies >< /weasles >< /RINOs >< /Reagan wannabees that are liberal >)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 253 | View Replies]

To: scripter
Thanks. And yes, it sure is...

Man, what do we really stand for? This is rather revealing...

258 posted on 01/02/2008 12:29:34 PM PST by DoughtyOne (< fence >< sound immigration policies >< /weasles >< /RINOs >< /Reagan wannabees that are liberal >)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 252 | View Replies]

To: pissant
Not a chance. Can you not see the perfect ticket would be Thompson and VP Hunter? I am sorry that Hunter did not get more recognition, but he didn't.

The media has not ceased to tell everyone ho listens to them that Fred is old, lazy, stumbling, etc. They say nothing to his message. They are so against him because he is a bonifide conservative and they prefer a RINO if they have to stomach a Repub Pres.

Just because ABC says it doesn't make it anywhere close to the truth.

vaudine

259 posted on 01/02/2008 12:30:31 PM PST by vaudine (RO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: vaudine

Perhaps, but in NH, Hunter and Fred are running neck and neck. Time for Fred to drop and endorse Hunter.


260 posted on 01/02/2008 12:32:44 PM PST by pissant (Duncan Hunter: Warrior, Statesman, Conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 259 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280281-290 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson