Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iowa Caucuses - Results Live Thread
January 3, 2008 | xjcsa

Posted on 01/03/2008 12:08:45 PM PST by xjcsa

Edited on 01/03/2008 7:30:11 PM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 3,221-3,230 next last
To: JohnnyZ
USSR Hillary
101 posted on 01/03/2008 1:03:33 PM PST by G8 Diplomat (Creatures are divided into 6 kingdoms: Animalia, Plantae, Fungi, Monera, Protista, & Saudi Arabia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: TonyInOhio

I’ll give ya a “chortle”


102 posted on 01/03/2008 1:03:36 PM PST by Squidpup ("Fight the Good Fight")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Khepri
ROMNEY SAYS DROPPING OUT IF HE DOESN’T WIN IOWA!!!!

That's what I heard!

103 posted on 01/03/2008 1:03:46 PM PST by Petronski (Willard Myth Romney: 51% negatives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: Brent88

I agree that we can’t count Hillary out yet. She has a strong base and can get them out to caucus. The problem with her, however, is that she does not inspire those not already in her camp. Her support is limited to what she has in the can right now. Turn out is going to be very important in this election. Overall low turnout will be good for Hillary b/c her base will be at the polls come *ell or high water.


104 posted on 01/03/2008 1:03:47 PM PST by toomanygrasshoppers ("In technical terminology, he's a loon")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: Khepri
ROMNEY SAYS DROPPING OUT IF HE DOESN’T WIN IOWA!!!!

That's what I heard!

105 posted on 01/03/2008 1:03:50 PM PST by Petronski (Willard Myth Romney: 51% negatives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: JohnnyZ

Ahem, the USSR Hillary.


106 posted on 01/03/2008 1:04:00 PM PST by Codename - Ron Benjamin (Pre-emptive, multi-tasking, interrupt control)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: All
Live Internet non-MSM coverage.

These links are new to me, so no endorsement is intended,

http://theuptake.org/?page_id=419

http://www.politicallunch.com/

http://www.c-span.org/

107 posted on 01/03/2008 1:04:12 PM PST by Milwaukee_Guy (Don't hit them between the eyes. Hit them right -in- the eyes!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

Whoops. Double post.


108 posted on 01/03/2008 1:04:19 PM PST by Petronski (Willard Myth Romney: 51% negatives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: xjcsa

Just saving my place...;-)


109 posted on 01/03/2008 1:04:28 PM PST by Right_in_Virginia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the lastbestlady

Any chance Fred surprises folks tonight and pulls out a 2nd place finish? Just wondering what happens if the Romney and Huckabee folks start splitting each of their camps.


110 posted on 01/03/2008 1:04:36 PM PST by GeorgiaDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Khepri

I like those predictions, funny too.


111 posted on 01/03/2008 1:04:42 PM PST by rurgan (socialism doesn't work. Government is the problem not the solution to our problems.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: counterpunch

‘Terry McAuliffe is on Fox News right now praising Mike Huckabee.
Huckabee is his candidate he wants to run against in November.’

Single best reason for those on the Right of the political spectrum to run away from the Dope from Hope.


112 posted on 01/03/2008 1:05:03 PM PST by Badeye (No thanks, Huck, I'm not whitewashing the fence for you this election cycle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: BGHater
Why do you think that?

Paul's been polling around 5% from what I recall, but I expect him to easily double that. I figure there's something to a lot of people coming into the process for Paul that haven't been counted in the polls. But to come in ahead of Thompson? I doubt that. That would take a good 15%+.

113 posted on 01/03/2008 1:05:33 PM PST by MitchellC (- www.fred08.com -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: xjcsa

Predictions. You heard it here first:

Republicans
1. Romney
2. Huckabee
3. McCain
4. Thompson
5. Guliani
6. Paul
7. Hunter
8. Keyes

Democrats
1. Edwards
2. Clinton
3. Obama
4. Biden
5. Richardson
6. Dodd
7. Kucinich
8. Gravel


114 posted on 01/03/2008 1:05:41 PM PST by dinoparty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xjcsa
May the Thompson folks make my cracked hard-boiled shell prediction wrong:

- Pubbies -
Huckabee - 26%
Romney - 24%
Thompson - 19%
Paul - 10%
McCain - 9%
Hunter - 5% (and a fraction above Giuliani)
Giuliani - 5%
Keyes - 2%

- Rats -
Edwards - 30%
Obama - 29%
Clinton - 28%
The field - 13%

115 posted on 01/03/2008 1:06:20 PM PST by steveegg (I am John Doe, and a monthly donor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xjcsa

I will toss my predictions in what the heck.. lol

Repubs:

1. Mike Huckabee
2. Fred Thompson
3. Mitt Romney
4. John McCain
5. Ron Paul

Dems:

1. Barack Obama
2. John Edwards
3. Hillary Clinton
4. Chris Dodd
5. Joe Biden

I really really hope Fred does as I have predicted, it might be wishful thinking but my bet is on him to surge when the rubber meets the road.


116 posted on 01/03/2008 1:06:38 PM PST by eXe (Si vis pacem, para bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnnyZ
I am eagerly awaiting the sinking of the USS Hillary.

USS?!?

I don't think so.

Good point. How were the Soviet Union's ships designated? That's how Hillary should be identified.

117 posted on 01/03/2008 1:09:05 PM PST by Bosco (Remember how you felt on September 11?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: xjcsa

Republicans

1. Huckster
2. Romney
3. Fred (with a bullet - closer to Romney than McCain and the winner of tonight’s “Better than Expected” award)
4. McCain
5. Ronpaul
6. Rudy

Dems

1. Obama
2. Breck Girl
3. Cankles (...It will be me...Cackle, Cackle)
4. Richardson


118 posted on 01/03/2008 1:10:09 PM PST by Loyolas Mattman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MitchellC
20th century polling, 21st century voting.

Polls are outdated and do not reflect the cell phone, caller ID, people who simply don’t respond to polls, and the people who are first time voters, switching parties and others.

119 posted on 01/03/2008 1:10:42 PM PST by BGHater (If Guns Cause Crime Then Matches Cause Arson?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: xjcsa

Here’s what I posted on Intrade last night.

Proceeding from this snapshot of chances to WIN the GOP caucus at Intrade,

Winner of 2008 Republican Iowa Caucus
REP.IOWA.HUCKABEE 53.2
REP.IOWA.ROMNEY 40.0
REP.IOWA.MCCAIN 1.0
REP.IOWA.THOMPSON(F) 0.3
REP.IOWA.GIULIANI 0.1
REP.IOWA.GINGRICH
REP.IOWA.FIELD 3.3

and noting that RPaul and Duncan Hunter have been bundled in the field, Here’s my prediction for tomorrow in terms of percentages.

REP.IOWA.HUCKABEE 33
REP.IOWA.ROMNEY 22
Duncan Hunter 12
REP.IOWA.MCCAIN 11
Ron Paul 9
REP.IOWA.THOMPSON(F) 8
REP.IOWA.GIULIANI 4
REP.IOWA.FIELD 1

Yes, I think Hunter will come in third. What’s the basis of my reasoning? Well, mostly wishful thinking, but there has been some movement here on Intrade for Hunter, and Iowans value authenticity. That’s why I see them giving Huckabee the nod, shunning Romney (in a relative sense, compared to all the money spent ), and not giving McCain as much of a boost as he’s showing in the polls. I also see them going in for Ron Paul because he’s genuine, if really far afield from mainstream GOP values.

Iowa is a caucus state, and polls usually end up being meaningless before caucus votes. Iowans always surprise the pundits, and they’re basically conservative.

I also think Obama will beat Clinton and there will be a complete revamping of Clinton’s campaign. She will be leaner, meaner, stronger, and tougher to beat as a result.


120 posted on 01/03/2008 1:11:00 PM PST by Kevmo (We should withdraw from Iraq — via Tehran. And Duncan Hunter is just the man to get that job done.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 3,221-3,230 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson